Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.10s
Petition — California v. Riegler
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Matthews (1980) 112 Cal.App.3d 11, 24, 169 Cal.Rptr. 263.) … Williams (5th Cir. 1980) 622 F.2d 830, 840 et. seq.) 24.
453 U.S. 919Amicus Curiae Brief — NationsBank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Section 24 (Seventh) grants national banks “all such incidental powers as shall be necessary to carry on the business of banking.” National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 24 (Seventh) (1994). … Selling annuities was not an incidental power speci- fied by Congress in Section 24 (Seventh).
511 U.S. 1141Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Wainwright (5th Cir. 1968) 399 F.2d 62; Wong Sun v. United States (1963) 371 U.S. 471; Badillo v. … Bower, supra, 24 Cal.3d 638; People v. Menifee (1979) 100 Cal.App. 3d 235-) 12.
449 U.S. 844Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 12, 2021
Rosa, 399 F.3d at 291, distinction or line to be drawn. 4. … App’x 395, 399 (9th Cir. 2019) (finding waiver based on Cain).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1942
United States, 24 Fed. Se a eas og Acie Sag aaah fen apes 24 Hale v. State Board of Assessment and Review, 302 MRT oo nee ee eh 10, 20 Helvering v. … His testimony was in terms of what the phrase means ‘‘to me’’ (R. 398-399, 413-414, 431).
316 U.S. 679Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Benasa Realty Co. v. Mooney
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
Co., 815 F.2d 254, 266 (3rd Cir. 1987) 23, 24 Mesarosh v. United States, ome Gels By BS CEPSOF «6 « te te te te 12 Offensend v. … Atlantic Refining Co., 322 Pa. 399, 185 A. 745 (1936) ... 39 Pavorsky, 148 A.2d at 103 ...... 39 Restatement (Second) of Torts SSJamials © © © 8 6 & © ee eel et lll hl SE Roe v.
507 U.S. 915Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2025
No. 24-316 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States __________ ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., Petitioners, v. … Res. 399 (June 2020). 14 care coverage has even helped cancer survivors obtain necessary care.37 II.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 8, 2025
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) .................... 16 Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc., 363 F.3d 1247 (Fed. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 405-07 (2012).
Asylum Law and Female Genital Mutilation: Recent Developments
Congressional research report · CRS Report · Feb 15, 2008
Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 745 (4th Cir. 2006). 16 In re A-T-, 24 I. & N. … . § 208.13(b)(1). 37 In re A-T-, 24 I. & N.
RS22810Congressional Research ServiceSupreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 10, 2026
The EEOC issued a Notice of Right to Sue on July 24, 2023, and Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on October 19, 2023. ECF 1. … Dist., No. 24-20227, 2025 WL 1219191, at *5 (5th Cir. Apr. 28, 2025).
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Oct 11, 1994
RP94-401-000, RP94-399-000, 001 and 002, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America CAG-9. Docket No. RP85-202-014, Trunkline Gas Company CAG-10. Docket Nos. … Omitted CAG-24. Omitted CAG-25. Docket No. GP90-7-000, Barbara T. Fasken CAG-26. Docket Nos. CP94-114-001 and CP94-694-001, Distrigas of Massachusetts CAG-27. Omitted CAG-28.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
reinstated because the notice of proposed removal had been insufficiently specific and had not included one of the reasons cited in the final Bureau decision ordering that petitioner be discharged (App. 18-24 … Testan; 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976); United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584 (1941).
441 U.S. 905Opposition — Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div. v. Craft
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
City of Eureka, 399 F. Supp. 64, 67-68 (D.Kan. 1975); Limuvel v. Southern Union Gas Co., 378 F. Supp. 964, 966-67 (W.D.Tex. 1974); Bronson v. … City of Chattanooga, 192 Tenn. 267, 241 S.W.24 291 (1951), and Jones v.
436 U.S. 1Opposition Brief — Naim v. Naim
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1955
(See Opinion below, Statement as to Jurisdiction, Page 24.) ca 4 trary or without a reasonable relation to the purpose of the statute. … Meyer y, Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399. The appellee’s reasoning pre- supposes the validity of the purpose of the statute. Oyama v. California, 332 U. S. 633, 646.
350 U.S. 891Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Pfeifer v. Bell & Howell Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974
(m September 24. 19TS. Pfeifer filed a notice of appeal of the District Judge's Getober 29, 1973 order [sice!] with the Tta Cireuit Court of Appeals (page following 399, Petition).
416 U.S. 973Opposition Brief for the United States — Webster v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief for the United States · 1971
most of these cars, inserting prices in the applications and bills of sale based on the retail value, although the actual ‘prices were often several thousand dollars below re- tail (Tr. 220-255, 399 … This is the limit established by Rule 24(b),, F.R.Crim.P., and the exercise of the court’s ° discretion in refusing to grant additional peremptory challenges was proper. United States v.
404 U.S. 853Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Benzo Elias Rudnikas, Petitioner v. Florida, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 9, 2026
Nov. 24, 2025) (“In our adversarial system of adjudication, we follow the principle of party presentation.” United States v. Sineneng-Smith, 590 U.S. 371, 375, 140 S.Ct. 1575, 206 L.Ed.2d 866 (2020). … United States, 554 U.S. 237, 243, 128 S.Ct. 2559, 171 L.Ed.2d 399 (2008)). To put it plainly, courts “call balls and strikes”; they don't get a turn at bat. Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez, 590 U.
Opposition Brief — Aura Systems, Inc. v. Frankston
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995
App. 1986), rev'd on other grounds, 399 Mass. 533 (1987). Silence from the Supreme Judicial Court meant no more than that the law was firmly settled. … [Pre Trial Conference Order at 5:23-24, Weems Decl. at Exhibit “G”.] 24.
516 U.S. 932Petition for Writ of Certiorari — In re Bisbee
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998
Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) .... 14, 17, 23, 25 Coopers and Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463 (1978) ..... 24 Corfield v. Coryell, 4 Wash., C.C. 371 (1823).......... 15 Faretta v. … App. 24-25a, infra. The decision below conflicts with the foregoing pre- cedents.
523 U.S. 1121Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lander v. Alabama
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
App. 521, 323 So.2d 406, cert. denied, 295 Ala. 399, 323 So.2d 411 (1975); German wv. State, 429 $0.2d 1138 (Ala.Cr. App. 1983). … App. 521, 323 So0.2d 406, cert. denied, 295 Ala. 399, 323 So.2d 411 (1975); German , State, 429 So.2d 1138 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983).
494 U.S. 1030
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.