Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.13s
Reply Brief — Robinson v. Kusper
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1978
S. 399 (1902) ............ 11 Worthy v. Bush, 262 Ill. 560 (1914) ................ 9 Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad Co. v. … S. 399, 411, 412 (1902); and Mobile & Ohio R. Co. v. State of Tennessee, 153 U. S. 486, 492, 493 (1894).
439 U.S. 825Opposition — Sierra Club v. Watt
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
No. 399, 86th Cong.. Ist Sess. … On February 24, 1947, the Secretary of the Interior forwarded to Congress a Finding of Feasibility pursuant to the 1939 Reclamation Act. H.R. Doc.
451 U.S. 965Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 399 (3d Cir. 1991), cert. denied, No. 91-298 (Dec. 2, 1991). … I 1989). 3 The court of appeals correctly rejected petitioner’s cursory constitutional objections (Pet. 24-25) as ‘‘meritless.” Pet. App. 10.
502 U.S. 1057Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 27, 2019
Thaler, 399 F. … Thaler, 399 F.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kenny Eugene Smart, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 22, 2023
Kaipat Pelisamen, 641 F.3d 399 (9th Cir. 2011)……………………..14 United States v. Pang, 362 F.3d 1187 (9th Cir. 2004)…………………………………...13 United States v. Ray, 549 F3d. … Kaipat Pelisamen, 641 F.3d 399, 408 (9th Cir. 2011); United States v. Reese, 745 F.3d 1075, 1083 (10th Cir. 2014).
Opposition Brief — United Mine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1953
(R. 75, 80, 83, 90, 94; 214, 227, 327, 336, 358-359, 375-376, 399, 409, 448, 461). At this point, Suver and Chaney took complete control of the situation in the mine Toeee ee pre a: © 6 yard. … Questions 1 and 2 (Pet. 17-21, 21-24) were presented in the almost identical case of United Mine Workers of America, District 31 et al. v.
344 U.S. 920Supplemental Brief — Osage Nation v. Irby
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 2011
Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994 UcClanahan v. Ariz. Tax 411 U.S. 164 (1973) Vurphy v. Oklahoma 511 U.S. 1102 (200 lem v. Bartlett 165 U.S. 463 (1984 uth Dakota v. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411 (1994)).
562 U.S. 1214Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis — Robert Antwain Stanback, Petitioner v. Faye Daniels
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis · Dec 20, 2017
Florida, 399 US. 78,90 S.Ct. 1893, 26 L.Ed 2d 446 (1970)..................7 Justices Of Boston Municipal Court vs. … Art. 1 24.................................................................................7 N.C. GEN.
Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Knost v. MacMillan
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1942
and writing for both herself and her husband, giving Don- ald motherly advice on business and on his marriage and divorce (R. 325-399). … Mace- Millan’s office to have him help her make a will with Donald the sole beneficiary (R. 23, 24, 30). They mod- eled it after the Doctor’s will, and Mrs.
317 U.S. 641Amicus Curiae Brief — Rogers v. Cortes (No. 06-1721)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Comm. 2007) (unreported order approving bill of costs entered January 24, 2007). … Tucker, 399 F. Supp. 1258 (E.D. PA 1975), aff'd, 424 U.S. 959 (1976) (affirming U.S.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dominguez v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
Marzano, 160 F.3d 399 (7 Cir. 1998), cert. denied. 349 U.S. 1175 (1999) ......... iis aces ee United States v. … Marzano, 160 F.3d 399, 401 (7 Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1171 (1999); United States v. Rawley, 152 F.3d 83 1, 848 (8 Cir. 1998); United States v.
532 U.S. 1039Appendix O — Giampa v. Giampa (No. 09-502)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix O · 2009
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 401, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923), “the right of parents to “bring up children,” 262 U.S., at 399, 43 S.Ct. 625, and to control the education of their own” is protected … VICTORIA contends that the following phrase is a non sequitur [the 24 sentence does not logically follow the 1**].
Reply Brief — Super Duper, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2011
Renosky, 399 F.3d 168 (38d Cir. 2005)). … Banjo Buddies, 399 F.3d at 174.
562 U.S. 1179Reply Brief — Federal Trade Commission, Petitioner v. Credit Bureau Center, LLC, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 28, 2020
See Pet. 24. … As the Court explained in Porter, the return of illegally acquired funds is “clearly a part of the subject matter of a suit for an injunction.” 328 U.S. at 399.
Reply Brief — Jason Laut, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 28, 2020
Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2020) .................................. 8 United States v. Miller, 891 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 2018) .............. 4, 7, 10, 11 United States v. … Medley, 972 F.3d 399, 406-10, n.4 (4th Cir. 2020).
Amicus Curiae Brief — In Re Grand Jury
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2022
Pet. at 24 (internal quotations and citation omitted). … United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998). 4 14 CONCLUSION The Court should adopt the D.C. Circuit’s significant purpose test. Respectfully submitted, LAWRENCE S.
Reply Brief — CoStar Group, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Commercial Real Estate Exchange, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 3, 2026
Dentsply Int’l, Inc., 399 F.3d 181, 191 (3d Cir. 2005) (emphasis added) (citation omitted). … See Pet. 23-24. And district courts have seized upon the Ninth Circuit’s disregard of Trinko in this very case to deny motions to dismiss for other refusal-to-deal claims.
Brief for Respondent — Gart v. Cole
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1959
B. 24 626,.the court, in uphalding an IIlinois slum clearance stat- ute, stated (414 Ill. at 617, 111 N. E. 2d at 636-637) : . … Peoria Housing Authority, 399 Ill. ~ 579, 594-595, 78 N. E. 2d 276, 284-285; Foeller v. Housing .
359 U.S. 978Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Riggins v. Nevada
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992
On January 20, February 17, 18, 19, 24 and March 9, 1988, Defendant’s Arraignment was held before the Honorable Judge James Brennan in the Clark County District Court (ROA 47).' … Superior Court 148 Ariz. 229, 714 P.2d 399, y.S, vy. Watson 893 F.2d 970 (8th Cir. 19S~)- The United States Supreme Court in Youngberg vy.
504 U.S. 127Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Abrego v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 399-404" (1985). … Waters 2115 Main Street Santa Monica,CA 90405 (310) 399-3259 Counsel for Petitioner Juan Garcia Abrego *Counsel of Record
538 U.S. 925
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.