Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.16s
Petition for Rehearing — Gregory Shawn Mercer, Petitioner v. E. A. Vega
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Dec 1, 2020
[A102-103, D3, G5, H5, J40, 023-24], U.S. v. … The reviewed 5/22/19 FRCP Rule 59 Motion documented Petitioner’s belated Disputed Statement of Facts [A339-399, H6-49, L24-54].
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — John Wayne Morgan, Jr., Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 16, 2026
Id. at 24. … June 24, 2024). Even beyond new prosecutions, § 922(g)(1)’s reach is staggering.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 22, 2024
Id. at 399. … Id. at 399.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
See id. at 399. … DeBoer, 772 F.3d at 399.
576 U.S. 644Opposition Brief — Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
/d. at 399. The government also inspected the labeling of the containers and compelled the manufacturer to deliver Agent Orange to it under threat of criminal sanctions. /d. at 399-400. … See Pet. at 24-25. The court did no such thing.
551 U.S. 142Appellants Reply Brief — Township of Midland v. Michigan State Boundary Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Reply Brief · 1978
Virginia, 6 Wheat 264, 399, 5 L ed. 257, 290, in respect of certain general expressions in the opinion in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 187, 2 L ed. 60. … Supp. 1397, 399 U.S. 901, 400 U.S. 855 (1970), page 29 Novi Brief.
435 U.S. 1004Opposition Brief — Hamilton v. City of Romulus
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
Pellullo, 399 F.3 197, 222 (3d Cir. 2005) cert den. 546 U.S. 1137; 126 Ct. 1141; 163 L. … Record 333, Memo/Order 7, pp 16-17, 24, 26; Record 335, Memo/Order, p 4 iting Record 201-5, Hamilton 12/11/06 dep, pp 39 196: Record 335.
563 U.S. 1021Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 27, 2026
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) .................................................. 4, 7 Cox Commc’ns, Inc. v. Sony Music Ent., No. 24-171, slip op. (U.S. … Sony Music Ent., No. 24-171, slip op. at 7 (U.S.
Opposition Brief — Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
Preambles {| 30,419 | FN EE ee eee eee ON 4,6 | Order No. 399-A, Refunds Resulting From Btu Measurement Adjustments, FERC Stats. & Regs., Regs. … See, e.g., Consolidated Gas Supply Corp., 24 FERC § 61,271 (1983). 11 [section 4] and defining its authority to modify them [sec- tion 5].” Pet. App. 52a.
498 U.S. 907Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rivera v. Frank
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
United States, 775 F. 2d 399 403-404 (1st Cir. 19385); Purtill v. Har» ris, 658 F. 24 134, 138 (3rd Cir. 1981); and Jordan v. … Hoffman, 694 F. 24 1146. (Dec. 1982). 7.
486 U.S. 1009Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ortega v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
Cerrato, 24 N.Y.21, 246 N.E.2d 501 (1961).. 10 People v. Clifton, 42 Tl.2d 526, 250. N.B.2d 649 (1969)... 10 People v. … Forbes, 24 Nd. 341, 132 A2d 1 (1957). See Anno. 76 A.L.R.2d 262 (1961); People v. Castro, 29 N LY.2d 324, 277 N.E.2d 654 (1971) ; People v. Cerrato, 24 N.Y.2d 1, 246 N.E.2d 501 (1961); People v.
411 U.S. 948Respondents Brief — United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1965
and Opinion No. 399°? without a “monstrosity” resulting. … This lack of notice and hearing alone is sufficient to vitiate the Commission’s sua sponte imposition of a price in- crease moratorium. 24 Instead, the Commission argues that ODECO did not properly
382 U.S. 223Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Clarence F. Stephenson, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 11, 2024
New York, 399 U.S. 117, 122-24 (1970) (citation omitted) (Harlan, J., concurring in the result in Williams). … Williams, 399 U.S. at 100.
Amicus Curiae Brief — James Skinner, Petitioner v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 25, 2025
Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) .......................... 18 Cone v. Bell, 556 U.S. 449 (2009) ....................................... 10 Connick v. … See Pet.App.24. This Court’s intervention is paramount. 6 The non-unanimous nature of Mr. Skinner’s conviction further taints this case. Louisiana adopted non-unanimous convictions “to 6 15 IV.
Motion Amicus Curiae — Kaplan v. California
Supreme Court brief · Motion Amicus Curiae · 1973
Florida, 399 U.S.78 35 Winters v. … Florida, 399 U.S.78, and Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S.404.
413 U.S. 115Opposition Brief — Southern Missouri Recycling & Waste Management District v. Yankton Sioux Tribe
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411 (1994); Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 463, 470 (1984). … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411-412 (1994); Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 469, 470-471 (1984).
564 U.S. 1019Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1974
Resor, 17 U.S.C.M.A. 135, 37 C.M.R. 399 LS | aa ne cn ee 4 Levy v. Resor, Civ. No. 67-422 (D.S.C. … Resor, 17 U.S.C.M.A. 135, 37 C.M.R.. 399 (1967); Levy v. Resor, Civ. No. 67-442 (D.S.C.
417 U.S. 733Amicus Curiae Brief — Evangelisto Ramos, Petitioner v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 18, 2019
Louisiana, 406 U.S. 399, 400 (1972) (Marshall, J., dissenting). 6 of 1898, art. 116. … Ct. 616, 623-24 (2016) (quotation marks omitted).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 18, 2022
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ............................. 14, 16, 19 Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, 140 S. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 427 (2006) (“LULAC”); Abrams, 521 U.S. at 92. 15 tions.”
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tobalina v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Massachu- setts.” (413 U.S. at 24). … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S.399; Win- ters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507.
419 U.S. 926
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.