Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.18s
Appellants Reply Brief — Township of Midland v. Michigan State Boundary Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Reply Brief · 1978
Virginia, 6 Wheat 264, 399, 5 L ed. 257, 290, in respect of certain general expressions in the opinion in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 187, 2 L ed. 60. … Supp. 1397, 399 U.S. 901, 400 U.S. 855 (1970), page 29 Novi Brief.
435 U.S. 1004Petition — DOBARD v. ALABAMA (No. 83-5695)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
Georgia, 429 U.S. 122, 97 §.Ct. 399 (1976) (Witherspoon mandates reversal ever if °rerely one” juror was Gismissec improperly). … lane Becks State 396 Se 24645:Ala 1960) Collateral references. — 24 CJS. Crom onal Lew ¢) 1643-1647 1431-1660 5S Am Jur 24, Appesl and Error. 4 723 ls
Application — Jonathan Dunn, Applicant v. Lloyd J. Austin III, Secretary of Defense, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Application · Apr 11, 2022
On August 24, 2021, respondent Austin ordered vaccination of all active-duty and reserve service members against COVID-19. 3 C.A.E.R. 399-400. … ECF 11-1, at 23-24; C.A. ECF 14-1, at 1112.
Reply Brief — The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 15, 2025
McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997) ........................................ 22-23 Riggs v. UCOR, LLC, 2024 WL 3634471 (Aug. 2, 2024, 6th Cir. 2024) ............................... 24 Salliotte v. … Br. 24. To repeat: contractors obtain immunity from suit only if they satisfy the two conditions articulated in Yearsley. Id. at 23–24.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Peterson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Vol.2, Rule 24, Sec. 381 p. 9n 19---- 24 TE PEE LS PES Fg I Ne I Ls Re Sa eee IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 1973 NO. … Cir. 1964), 8 Moore Sec. 24.03 p. 24-32, 33.
419 U.S. 831Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 25, 2019
App. 24. … App. 24.
Petition for Rehearing — Illinois Central Railroad Company, Appt. v. Wirt Adams
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1901
Same case, 24 Fla. 209. Am. Live Stock Co. vs. Chicago, Ke. 56 Am. St. 399, 400. Same case, 145 []ls., 210. Indian River, &e., vs. East Coast, &e., 29 Am. St. 276, Burlington, &e., vs.
180 U.S. 28Memorandum — Melvin Friedman v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1975
February 15, 1973, Peachtree Dis- count Distributors, also a subsidiary of Peachtree National Distributors, mailed obscene material from Atlanta, Geor- gia, to Books Limited Number | in Little Rock (Tr. 399 … Feola, No. 73-1123, decided March 19, 1975, slip op. at 14-24.)
421 U.S. 1004Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1975
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 26 L.Ed.2d 446, 90 S.Ct. 1893 (1970). See also Amsin v. … Fouche, 396 U.S. 346, 24 L.Ed.2d 567, 90 S.Ct. 532 (1970). The order here applies equally to all persons within the class by regulating official and free-lance court reporters.
423 U.S. 1017Emergency Application — Ronald Palmer Heath, Petitioner v. Florida, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Feb 6, 2026
By way of example, on June 25, 2025, a date corresponding to Florida inmate Thomas Gudinas’s execution (which actually occurred on June 24), the inventory logs only show 10 x 10ml vials of rocuronium bromide … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409-10 (1986) (The Eighth Amendment seeks “to protect the dignity of 6 society itself from the barbarity of exacting mindless vengeance” when carrying out an execution.)
Emergency Application — Ronald Palmer Heath, Applicant v. Florida, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Feb 6, 2026
By way of example, on June 25, 2025, a date corresponding to Florida inmate Thomas Gudinas’s execution (which actually occurred on June 24), the inventory logs only show 10 x 10ml vials of rocuronium bromide … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409-10 (1986) (The Eighth Amendment seeks “to protect the dignity of 6 society itself from the barbarity of exacting mindless vengeance” when carrying out an execution.)
Petitioners Brief, — Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief, · 1966
Vol., pp. 399-440; R. 278). This September 24, 1963, Section 6 Notice, also called ‘‘The Uniform Working Agree- | ment”? (Exh. … Vol., pp. 399-440; R. 278). In regard to the non-operating crafts, the carrier proposed an initial conference on its September 24, 1963, Section 6 Notice for October 18, 1963 (Exh. Vol., p. 400).
384 U.S. 238Amicus Curiae Brief — Microsoft Corp. v. AT & T CORP.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Microsoft Corp., 399 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 568 (2005).............-..265 6 Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings v. … Claim 24 of the patent in suit is both illustrative and representative of the patent claims. Claim 24 can be parsed into its constituent elements as follows: sas 24.
550 U.S. 437Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Reid v. Covert
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1956
ed.) §§ 24-409, 24-411), but, since.the reorganization of the District of Columbia Government, he is now subject to the supervision of the Director of the De- | partment of Corrections, who in turn … BS 399, 406. ° In the Krueger case, Jur. St. ‘App. at 16a, tie . district court expréssly rejected the Arniy’s contention.
351 U.S. 487Reply Brief — John D. Freeman, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 29, 2021
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) .................................................................. 12 Hall v. … A.B. at 24.
Opposition — Bell & Howell Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
The election resulted in seven votes for Local 399, and one against (id. at A28). … This doctrine was first enunciated by the Board in Miranda Fuel Company, _Inc.:%9 See Meltzer, supra at p. 24.
442 U.S. 942Respondents Brief — Foster v. Love
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1997
Ct. 399 yy) ) ) oe 23 Kelly v. Washington, 302 U.S. 1, 58 S.Ct. 87 (IDBT) oo ccc cc ceccccccccseseccscceses 24 Love v. Foster, 90 F.3d 1026 (6th Cir. 1996) ...... 9, 23 Love v. … Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218, 67 RO EE oe ee 24, 25 State v. Frear, 142 Wis. 320, 125 N.W. 961 (Wis. BRED ov SARTET TATE. AMAIBIVOAL cc cece. 24 Swift & Co. v.
522 U.S. 67Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gmerrio Underwood, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 15, 2025
Underwood, No. 24-30419, 2025 WL 101172 (5th Cir. … Id. at 24.
Jurisdictional Statement — Jernigan v. Lendall
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1977
Tucker, supra, 399 F. Supp. at 1266 and 1267. … electors equal in number to at least seven percent [7% ] of the total vote cast for the office of Governor or nominees for Presidential Electors, at the last preceding election, so as to establish a 24
433 U.S. 901Opposition — Taylor v. Tennessee
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970), rehearing denied, 400 U.S. 856, 91 S.Ct. 23, 27 L.Ed.2d 94 (1970). … California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969). 399 US. at 54, 90 S.Ct. at 1982. One year later, in the case of Whitley v.
430 U.S. 965
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.