Documents

CBCA 4920 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION;

Agency decision · Agency decision

To complete this review, AEC prepared multiple SEIS drafts, addressed numerous CBCA 4920, 5093 4 public comments, and released a final SEIS to the public. Id. ¶ 19. … Task order 2 had a single period of performance, from July 11, 2012, through November 30, 2014, and did not contain option periods which the NRC unilaterally could exercise to further extend that period

In the Matter of DAMERON HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

Agency decision · Agency decision

This policy will be posted for public comment and stakeholder input prior to finalization and issuance.” Id. at 2. … under the Stafford Act.

UNITED STATES CIVILIAN

Agency decision · Agency decision

The Board first dismissed the Government’s argument that the Copyright Act precluded the CBCA from hearing this licensing dispute under the Contract Disputes Act, holding that the Copyright Act did not … At this reunion, we asked our law clerks to comment on their time at the CBCA.

THIS OPINION WAS INITIALLY ISSUED UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER AND

Agency decision · Agency decision

The contractual period for completing that deliverable expired more than a year before the June 16, 2023, termination. … In its brief, Y2Fox accuses DOS of acting in bad faith in various ways, such as by allegedly ignoring the contract modification extending the performance period for CLIN 001, by not responding to emails

GRANTED IN PART: November 6, 2013

Agency decision · Agency decision

Under the Contract Disputes Act, “[i]nterest on an amount found due a contractor on a claim shall be paid to the contractor for the period beginning with the date the contracting officer receives the contractor … CBCA 2235 19 The final subject on which we comment is something that has consumed a great deal of the IBWC’s attention: the New Mexico gross receipts tax (GRT).

In the Matter of DALTON M. COKER

Agency decision · Agency decision

Coker thirty days to ask us to reconsider our dismissal of his claim, his February 2019 filing was too late (even if we subtract the period of the partial government shutdown), and our dismissal was already … CBCA 6379-RELO 3 It is not this Board’s statutory role to comment on matters within the scope of federal employees’ collective bargaining agreements, and ordinarily we are careful not to do so.

MOTION FOR SUMMARY RELIEF IN CBCA 340 DENIED; CBCA 341 DENIED:

Agency decision · Agency decision

The contract performance period included a base period of two years and three option years. Id. at I-5. … to act in good faith.

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION: December 4, 2024

Agency decision · Agency decision

Acabay argues that it timely filed its appeal via the United States Postal Service (USPS) within the ninety-day period. … Appellant’s Comments in Response to the Respondent’s Reply to the Appellant’s Response to the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction at 2-3, 5. Mr.

Board of Contract Appeals

Agency decision · Agency decision

GSA proposes to do this pursuant to garnishment provisions contained in the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA), Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). … WEEE with the request that she provide her own comments on the report no later than Thursday, November 11. She failed to reply to our request. By overnight mail, we advised GSBCA 16520-DBT 2 Ms.

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM: August 18, 2016

Agency decision · Agency decision

Standards and Scope of Review We have jurisdiction of this timely appeal under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (2012). … The plausibility standard is not akin to a ‘probability requirement,’ but it asks for more than a sheer possibility that a defendant has acted unlawfully.” Ashcroft v.

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY RELIEF AND SANCTIONS DENIED: March 19, 2008

Agency decision · Agency decision

On January 6, 2007, in accordance with section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, Pub. L. … Paragraph L.1.2 of the RFQ stated that the “Government contemplates award of one Firm Fixed Price task order with a base period of 5 months, plus 2 option periods of 6 months and 1 months [sic].”

DENIED: March 25, 2025

Agency decision · Agency decision

As separate bases for relief, it contends that the agency acted improperly in using excessive time to grant each clearance. … For the “first” individual, from application submission to approval, the period was less than thirty days.

In the Matter of LIVINGSTON PARISH

Agency decision · Agency decision

Section 565 of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, provides as follows: The Inspector General [of the Department of Homeland Security] shall review the applications for public … Two are worthy of comment: (1) We disagree with the proposition that the statute permits an applicant to come here only if the Inspector General finds an error by the agency in addressing the merits of

GRANTED IN PART: March 29, 2024

Agency decision · Agency decision

Applicant, Hughes Group LLC (Hughes), filed an application under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 5 U.S.C. § 504 (2018), seeking $149,201.50 in attorney fees and $8532.12 in costs, for a total of … Hughes commented that it was common practice for parties to file such motions at the conclusion of discovery.

GRANTED IN PART: March 31, 2016

Agency decision · Agency decision

The task order period was later extended to May 31, 2005, through issuance of four modifications. … Stevens, acting for USFK, contacted ISS to secure additional HNAs.

DECISION ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: January 14, 2020

Agency decision · Agency decision

I am hereby notifying you that my license to practice law in the Commonwealth of Virginia was suspended, on April 26, 2019 for a period of one year and one day. … The comments to this guideline state that “[t]here are circumstances where failure to make a disclosure is the equivalent of an affirmative misrepresentation.”

In the Matter of MANASOTA MATTERS, INC.

Agency decision · Agency decision

Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Management Act, 42 U.S.C. § 5189a(d) (2018) (the Stafford Act), of a dispute with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regarding eligibility for public … I conclude that the applicant has demonstrated no basis in the record to alter the denial and would not reach beyond the regulations, which were issued after a notice and comment period, with FEMA leaving

DENIED: November 8, 2016

Agency decision · Agency decision

In its comment, DOE states that “[w]e are not sure what normal business requirements would entail, but are concerned that would allow for more insurance than what is anticipated. … and for those periods as the Contracting Officer may require or approve and with sureties and insurers approved by the Contracting Officer.”

DENIED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION:

Agency decision · Agency decision

The contract period of performance was from April 21 to September 30, 2021. … circumstances of this case, such an allegation is irrelevant to whether Heroes Hire’s later decision to preclude its RN employee from providing services at the medical center justified termination. 4 One commentator

In the Matter of CITY OF LONG BEACH, MISSISSIPPI

Agency decision · Agency decision

Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. § 5189a (2018). The Board is only being asked to decide scope eligibility in this arbitration. … On December 31, 2020, the President declared the hurricane event a disaster (FEMA-4576-DR-MS), with an incident period of October 28 to 29, 2020, which authorized public assistance for the City. 1 The