Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.99s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), NA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
More recently, the OCC promulgated a final rule, following a notice and comment period, formalizing its interpretation of section 85. … Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 421 U.S. 60, 87 (1975) (deferring to EPA’s interpre- tation of Clean Air Act in part because “there has undoubt- edly been reliance upon [the EPA’s] interpretation
517 U.S. 735Amicus Curiae Brief — National Collegiate Athletic Association, Petitioner v. Shawne Alston, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 8, 2021
McDavis, Comment, The Value of Amateurism, 29 Marq. Sports L. … (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 3, 2024
(cleaned up)). The question, therefore, is whether criminalizing something innocent like homelessness exceeds “the government’s power to punish” under the Eighth Amendment. Austin v. … App. 57a; see JA 109 (describing the discovery of “a homeless individual who is repeatedly picked up for trespassing after hours, in severe distress outside in the frigid air,” who “disclosed fear that
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 27, 2025
Period. … Despite the overwhelming criticism that LePage’s has faced from courts and commentators alike, the decision has been cited over one hundred times in lower court opinions since the Third Circuit acknowledged
Amicus Curiae Brief — Zicarelli v. New Jersey Comm'n of Investigation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972
Jersey statute: | - | : - NBA. 52: OMT oli. be cence senses ca ; British statutes: = = * : Air Force Act of 1955, 3&4 Eliz. 2, C. 19, § 135 ae Army Act of 1955, 3 & 4 Eliz. 2, ¢. 18, $135 0.020. - … The, Army Act and the Air Force Act likewise contain immunity . provisions phrased as a limited use statute Cievidence . given... shall not be admissible’) which would fal¥ .
406 U.S. 472Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 24, 2021
And in the usual case, the act of resigning union membership and the act of revoking a dues authorization are treated as separate acts, so employees who “resign” with the intent to free themselves from … Expense Bd., 527 U.S. 666, 682 (1999) (cleaned up; emphasis added). 17 There is thus nothing new about Janus’s insistence that waiver must be shown by “clear and compelling evidence.” 138 S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Brooks v. Burlington Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 90 (1983). … to make periodic contributions into that trust.
477 U.S. 901Amicus Curiae Brief — Howard L. Baldwin, et ux., Petitioners v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 25, 2019
The route is clear: all agencies must do is undergo a sham notice-and-comment processes to serve as an invitation to judicial deference. … Ct. at 2414 (cleaned up). In the entire rulemaking, the IRS offered a paltry nine paragraphs of explanation. According to the IRS, its rule was precipitated by a circuit split over the mailbox rule.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
THE MASSACHUSETTS REGULATION IS NOT PREEMPTED BY THE FEDERAL ACT. A. … Acting Attorney General, 405 U.S. 1000 (1972).
532 U.S. 956Amicus Curiae Brief — Bennett v. Spear
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Ct. 1900, 1913-1914 (1994) (Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., to be adminis- tered so as to avoid interference with state’s water alloca- tions). … In commenting on the House version of the 1973 Amend- ments to the Act, the House Report notes that the Act's proposed citizen suit provisions are “|pjarallel to that contained in the recent Marine
520 U.S. 154Amicus Curiae Brief — Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
I do however, want to make some general comments on Indian gaming before Mr. Duffy offers the Department's testimony. … After recovering from the economic dol- drums following the closure of the local air force base in the 1970’s, our entire area is enjoying a revival.
517 U.S. 44Amicus Curiae Brief — 303 Creative LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Aubrey Elenis, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 19, 2022
Air Force Major General Patricia A. … object of Title II [of the Act] was to vindicate the “deprivation of personal dignity’.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Iowa v. Tovar
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Conversely, some defense counsel may protract litigation and encourage clients to remain in - 8 denial rather than coming clean and admitting guilt in a guilty plea. … Thus, some states keep no transcripts of plea hearings in misdemeanor cases, and others routinely destroy them after a limited period of time.
541 U.S. 77Amicus Curiae Brief — Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Ctr., Inc., 135 S. Ct. 44 (2014) (No. 14-15)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 485 (1983). — City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Ter- minal, Inc., 411 U.S. 624 (1973). — Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 436 U.S. 151 (1978). — Gade v. … * See, Alexander Hamilton, prior cited on this point at Footnote 4. 22 Amicus comments that the true function of the Court, to preserve the federalism system when, as in case at bar, two of the
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 29, 2025
Missouri, 603 U.S. 43, 56 (2024) (cleaned up); see also DaimlerChrysler, 547 U.S. at 341. … Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464, 474 (1982) (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 29, 2025
Missouri, 603 U.S. 43, 56 (2024) (cleaned up); see also DaimlerChrysler, 547 U.S. at 341. … Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464, 474 (1982) (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 29, 2025
Missouri, 603 U.S. 43, 56 (2024) (cleaned up); see also DaimlerChrysler, 547 U.S. at 341. … Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464, 474 (1982) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gerald Lynn Bostock, Petitioner v. Clayton County, Georgia
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 3, 2019
United Air Lines, Inc., 444 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir. 1971)............................. 6 Zarda v. … United Air Lines, Inc., 444 F.2d 1194, 1198 (7th Cir. 1971)). See, e.g., Phillips v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Homeland Security, et al., Applicants v. New York, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 20, 2020
First, an NPRM that never matures into a final rule is a nullity: “any notion of ascribing weight to anything that has remained in the ‘proposed regulation’ limbo for a like period [of 13 years] is totally … conflicts with judicially noticeable facts and laws: • The motion claims that affected residents work in “essential industries [such as] providing healthcare, preparing and delivering food to residences, cleaning
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 14, 2022
Air Regul. Grp. v. … Air Regul. Grp. v. E.P.A., 573 U.S. 302, 315 (2014); see also Michigan v. E.P.A, 576 U.S. 743, 750 (2015).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.