Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — James LeBlanc, Petitioner v. Brian McNeal

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 8, 2024

Bormes, 568 U.S. 6, 14 (2012), the Court held that because the Fair Credit Reporting Act created a “detailed remedial scheme,” it precluded recourse to the Little Tucker Act. Id. at 15. … Texas, 601 U.S. 285, 292-93 (2024) (cleaned up). Yet how to calculate the correct detention period and ensure timely release are important questions of prison administration.

Amicus Curiae Brief — BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

It is not fraud to perform an act or fail to perform an act which the law allows. … Congress does not write “on a clean slate” when it enacts bankruptcy statutes. Dewsnup v Timm, supra, at 779.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Miranda Stovall, Petitioner v. Jefferson County Board of Education, dba Jefferson County Public Schools, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 22, 2026

App. 2025) (holding that the Copyright Act did not preempt Georgia’s Open Records Act and that the act contained no copyright exemption, without deciding fair use); Brewer v. Metro. … The Sixth Circuit separately commented that Stovall lacked Article III standing because Pearson’s infringement suit was too speculative. Stovall, 164 F.4th at 562–63.

Amicus Curiae Brief — US Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

Section 77B was added to the 1898 Act by the Act of June 7, 1934, ch. 424, 48 Stat. 911. … The semicolon probably should be a period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kristi Noem, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Applicants v. Svitlana Doe, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 13, 2025

Dream Act Coalition v. Brewer, 855 F.3d 957 (9th Cir. 2017)............................................................................1 Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S. … See e.g., Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974

Without further comment on the logic of this reasoning, suffice it to say that your amicus does not contest for a moment that telegraph wires and air waves are subject to regulation and may be regulated … candidates — for election, it follows that freedom of expression shal] not long be a right retained by the people but a limited privilege exercised under the color of public interest by whomever acts

Amicus Curiae Brief — New v. Cohen

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

Bond, 395 U.S. 683 (1969), commenting that in Reid, McElroy and Toth, supra, it “vindicated complainants’ claims without requirmg exhaustion of military remedies,” because “we did not believe that … New would eventually be able to have his claims aired m an Article III court. Both the district court and the court of appeals appeared to imdicate that Mr.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

of 1974 (“ERISA” or “Act”), 29 U.S.C … The Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act (“MPPAA”), Pub.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Zubik v. Burwell, 136 S. Ct. 444 (2015) (No. 14-1418)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

- HHS-Reg-Nondiscrimination-Federally-F unded-Health.pdf (“USCCB Section 1557 Comments’). … ' These include providing cash assistance, food, water, personal care supplies, and cleaning materials.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Exportadora de Sal, S. A. de C. V. v. Sugimoto

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

Mexico respectfully finds the Ninth Circuit’s comments insensitive to the laws of a sovereign nation. … The Ninth Circuit in Sugimoto, however, found that, "Exportadora was engaged in commercial activity within the United States when the air taxi [Aviones] flew in United States air space,...".

Amicus Curiae Brief — Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Comm'n

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

This is one example of what’s wrong with the PATRIOT Act as it currently stands. … The justifications for the regulation of express advocacy apply equally to ads aired during those periods if the ads are intended to influence the voters’ decisions and have that effect.

Amicus Curiae Brief — B. W., a Minor, By Next Friends M. W. and B. W., formerly known herein as Jon AISD Doe, Petitioner v. Austin Independent School District

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 17, 2025

Brooks sued for racial harassment under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. … (cleaned up). The same principle should apply here.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

Nor does the order impair PGandE’s free- dom to hold its beliefs and act in accord with its corporate views. … In so doing, the statute threatened to stifle editorial comment by encour- aging newspaper editors to steer the safe course and avoid controversy.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bank of America, N.A. v. Toledo-Cardona, 135 S. Ct. 677 (2014) (No. 14-163)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014

The Court then invalidated the Frazier-Lemke Act on constitutional grounds: “The province of the Court is limited to deciding whether the Frazier-Lemke Act ... as applied has taken from the bank without … It stated: “However, were we to decide this issue cn a clean slate, we would not so hold.

Amicus Curiae Brief — McConnell v. Federal Election Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Justice Breyer correctly observed that the process of examining “our Constitution and how it fits into the governing documents of other nations . . . will be a challenge for the next generation.”™ Such comments … However, the court left intact a three-day blackout period. Justices Brennan, Deane, and Toohey volunteered positive views on the constitutionality of the three-day blackout period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. Morash

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

Indeed, even should the employer offer an inducement to employees not to use their accumulated leave during some particu- lar period, such inducement is not among the benefits covered in the Act. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96-97 (1983)) (emphasis in Mackey).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rasul v. Bush

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Chicago & Southern Air Lines v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103, 111 (1948). … Chicago & Southern Air Lines, 333 U.S. at 111; Dept of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 530 (1988); Totten v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — McConnell v. Federal Election Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

The two major parties together collected a total of $470 million in soft money in that period. See Common Cause, The Soft Money Finale! … Phase Three: 1996-2002--The expansion of the soft money system from the “ground war” to the “air war.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kaley Chiles, Petitioner v. Patty Salazar, in Her Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 12, 2025

Pet.69a n.45 (cleaned up). … For instance, APA swiftly commented on allegations against a Supreme Court nominee— denouncing “statements questioning the integrity of Dr.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Moose Jooce, et al., Petitioners v. Food and Drug Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2021

Cir. 2015) (finding that the agency’s acting general counsel violated the Federal Vacancies Reform Act). … Cir. 2019) (cleaned up); see also Intercollegiate Broad., 796 F.3d at 119 n.3 (ratification defeats Appointments Clause challenge).