Documents

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Masiello v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1972

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42. 2. … Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1970).

Reply Brief — Collins ex rel. Shufelt v. Duggan

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1995

To wit: 454 (2-a), (2-b), (2-c), (2-d), and (3-b) which can be found in petitioner’s petition (pp. 20, 22-24). … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Textron Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998)............... Te sdehsieeebersseeeveses 2,3 U.S. v. Adlman, 134 F.3d 1194 (2d Cir. 1998).......... ioduyesuresversoeseos 9g United States v. … Textron, No. 09-750 (Dec. 24, 2009), but should also encompass those that are prepared to serve both a business and a litigation purpose, whether or not a claim is ever threatened or filed.

Opposition Brief — Lopez v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

State, 472 So.2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) 24 ~ 7a = TABLE OF AUTHORITIES(Cont. ) Segura, et al., v United States, 468 U.S. 796, 82 L.Ed.2d 599 (1984) State v. … Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970).

Reply Brief — Visa U. S. A. Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2002

MASON ARNOLD & PORTER 399 Park Avenue , New York, NY 10022-4690 (212) 715-1000 Counsel for Visa U.S.A. Inc. CARTER G. PHILLIPS* VIRGINIA A. … They contend that there were no “existing and identifiable manageability problems” present in this case, Opp. 24 (emphases omitted), and that this fact distinguishes the instant case from those cited

Petition for ReHearing — Halliwell v. Superior Court of California, Sonoma County (No. 09-199)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for ReHearing · 2009

..... 4 England v Louisiana State Board of Medical Exam- iners (1964) 375 U.S. 411, 415, 417.......... 13, 14 Flynn v United States (1955) 348 U.S. 900....... 10 Ford v Wainwright (1986) 477 U.S. 399 … (Transcript at 7:21-24) When the California Supreme Court did complete its process of discretionary review by denying Defendants’ petitions, Charles Jensen argued that these denials were rulings on

Appellants Brief — Taylor v. Louisiana

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1975

Res. 61 Before the Subcomm. on Constitutional Amend- ments of the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, Sist Cong., 24 Ses. 7 25:27 0190) aed x oss eas 10 Women’s Bureau, U.S. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970) and Carter y. Jury Commission, 396 U.S. 320 (1970).

Reply Brief — United Water Conservation District, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 11, 2026

United States, 282 U.S. 399 (1931) ............................................ 4, 5 Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass’n v. … Water Code § 102); see Pet. 24.

Reply Brief — Michael Barreto, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 24, 2026

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ...................................................................................................................5 Kingdomware Techs., Inc. v. … Dated: February 24, 2026 Respectfully submitted, BALLARD SPAHR LLP By: /s/ Michael P. Robotti Michael P.

Memorandum — Toliver v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1974

black bag and several 'We are lodging with the Clerk of the Court the two-volume trans- cript of trial (“Tr.”) and the one-volume transcript of the pre-trial hearing (“H.”). 3 cartons in his car (H. 24 … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42; Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160; Carroll vy. Uni- j ted States, 267 U.S. 132; see United States v. Summer- ville, 477 F.2d 393 (C.A. 5).

Opinion — United States v. Oppenheimer

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1916

Keitel, 211 U.S. 370, 399, had reference only to the construction of the indictment and to its sufficiency upon matters not involving a statute, in cases brought up by the United States under the earlier … Miles, 24 Q. B. D. 423, 431. The finality of a previous adjudication as to the matters determined by it, is the ground of decision in Commonwealth v.

Petition for Rehearing — Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. Borrero (No. 324)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1961

McCarthy, 105 Utah 399, 142 P. 2d 649, and Moore v. Den- ver € R.G. W. R. Co., 4 Utah 2d 255, 292 P. 2d 849, 852, dis- approving such an instruction, and to Ellis v. Union Pacific R. … A. 3), 290 F. 24 296, cited at p. 17 of the petition.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Freedman v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976

The opinion of the Dis- trict Court for the District of New Jersey is reported at 399 F. Supp. 668 (D. N. … Scornavocco’s Restaurant, Inc., No. 75-1483 (7 Cir., Dec. 24, 1975) (corporation ).

Petition — Andrus v. Idaho

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

D. 399-400 (1908). … The discretionary nature of the Carey Act was discussed in State of Wyoming, 36 L.D. 399, 399-400 (1908), as follows: It is clear from the terms of the act of August 18, 1894, supra, under which the

Respondents Brief — Gerstein v. Pugh

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1975

Alabama, 399 U.S. PEE 8606 vnc Hibs 7,19,35 Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443(1970) ..... Passim Frontiero v. … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 22 (Burger, C.J., dissenting) with roots in the common law.

Brief for Appellee — Mandel v. Bradley

Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellee · 1977

Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 (1968) ...... 13, 22, 23, 24 Wood v. Putterman, 316 F. mane | 646 (D. Md.), aff’d. … 399 FP, Supp. at 1265.

Respondents Brief — Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al., Appellants v. Shannon Perez, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 28, 2018

Strickland, 556 U.S. 1, 24 (2009). … Comm. to End the War in Viet Nam, 399 U.S. 383, 388 (1970) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d)).

Brief of Respondent in Opposition to Petition for Certiorari — Shawkee Manufacturing Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.

Supreme Court brief · Brief of Respondent in Opposition to Petition for Certiorari · 1944

S. 399. 421. where this Court said: a “There has been much discussion as to whether extrinsic fraud is here alleged, and the case of United States v. … On October 24, 1941, the original petition herein was filed.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2011

Deference 1s Unwarranted Because this Case Does Not Present Matters. of Ixclusively Local Concern. ................... 24 B. … I, § 8, cl. 17 Statutes: 28 U.S.C. § 1257(a)....... 30) 24, Zd, 30 18 26 1, 32 | + Fay. A 20 13, 24, 26 S 61D | § 1257(b) D.C. Code § 1-125(b) (1977 Supp.)

Reply Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007

Richmond, 496 U.S. 414, 419-24 (1990). Il. … See Br. of Amici Curiae STAPPA et al. 7-16; Br. of States of New York, et al. 22-29; Br. of Former Administrators Browner and Train 21-24.