Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
3.59s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Assn., Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Sec. 1307(a)(2) and Sec. 2720 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. … Under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C.
527 U.S. 173Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 10, 2025
App. 40a (cleaned up). … Dkt. 42, at 3, 26 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Fisher v. Univ. of Tex. At Austin, 135 S. Ct. 2888 (2015) (No. 14-981)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
KOFFSKY Acting Principal Deputy General Counsel Department of Defense Washington, D.C. 20301 STEVAN E. … Dep’t of the Air Force, Air Force Policy Di- rective 36-70 (Oct. 13, 2010), http://Awww.af.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 26, 2022
Dialysis, put most simply, is a medical procedure during which a person’s blood is filtered and cleaned outside the kidney. … Under the Social Security Act, a Medicare beneficiary is defined as “an individual who is entitled to benefits under part A or enrolled under part B.” 42 U.S.C. § 1395a(b)(6)(a) (emphasis added).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
The Court held that laches is not a defense to copyright infringement claims seeking damages that are brought within the Copyright Act’s three-year limitations period. … Utility Air Regulatory Grp. ev. Environmental Protection Agency, 134 S. Ct. 2427, 2441 (2014).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 7, 2023
Reed, 576 U.S. at 171 (cleaned up). … Burson, 504 U.S. at 199 (plurality opinion) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Danco Laboratories, LLC, Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 7, 2026
Air Force Major General (Ret.) Patricia A. Rose is a retired senior logistics and operational leader who served more than three decades in the U.S. Air Force. … Pacific Command and Air Force Materiel Command.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2018
Bergin, Comment, Does Application of the APA’s “Committed to Agency Discretion” Exception Violate the Nondelegation Doctrine?, 28 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. … But, talking to many of my colleagues, I learn that they certainly would not have voted for it if they had known the implications and the extremes to which the act would be carried.”). 25 the Clean Air
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Ed.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Act and 1934 Securities Exchange Act to construe 1940 Investment Advisors Act). … Chevron itself, for instance, concerned an EPA rule expressly defining 24 the term “stationary source” as used in the Clean Air Act. See Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v.
544 U.S. 167Amicus Curiae Brief — Daphne Moore, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 22, 2022
Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207, 215 (1986) (no search because plane 1,000 feet in the air was in public navigable airspace), and Florida v. … In Jones, the Court held that a trespass “is neither necessary nor sufficient to establish a constitutional violation.” 565 U.S. at 408 n.5 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Armstrong
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
The task force held five public hearings throughout the state and received written comments from over 300 people. … This would allow periodic monitoring of charging and sentencing discrepancies along racial lines.
517 U.S. 456Amicus Curiae Brief — McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (Nos. 06-970, 06-969)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
of 1947, ch. 120, § 304, 61 Stat. 159-160 .0... eee eeeeeeee 11 Tillman Act of 1907, Pub. … However, only part of the total electioneering communications period at issue in this case was due to the primary; on September 2, or two weeks before the primary, the 60- day general election period
Amicus Curiae Brief — In Re WINSHIP (No. 778)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969
Rule 26, Comment. … See Rule 26, Comment: “Note.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Justice Justice v. Department of Defense (No. 08-125)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Deptt of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361(1976) (internal quotations omitted). … The circuit court held that Klamath did not control the outcome in this case, because the attorneys’ interests in soliciting their comments were not identified. Id.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 26, 2025
This Court 5 should read the Act in light of that structure and history; in light of consistent executive practice, which provides powerful evidence that the Act’s original public meaning included robust … Nken, 556 U.S. at 429 (cleaned up) (quoting Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy, Inc. v. NRC, 479 U.S. 1312, 1313 (1986) (Scalia, J., in chambers)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Olmstead v. LC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Now, when he and his mother go to a restaurant, he will comment if she is not eating. Recently, his mother noted that Bernie had spontane- ously commented that she had cut her hair. … Finally, this case will decide whether a civil rights statute, similar in in- tent to the Voting Rights Act, the Fair Housing Act, and the Ci\ il Rights Act of 1964, will be enforced equally across
527 U.S. 581Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
The alleged period of damages spans from the initial construction in the 1920’s to the present and into the indefinite future. … the light of public scrutiny.’ ” Department of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 358 (1976) (cite omitted).
532 U.S. 1Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
STATUTES: Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 702 eg VER EUR aaron argent eee een Leon, le MISCELLANEOUS: Comment, “The Original Jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court,” 11 Stan. … See Comment, “The Original Jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court,” 11 Stan. L.Rev. 665, 674 (1959).
510 U.S. 818Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 18, 2025
Senator Ben Ray Lujan, Universal Service Fund (USF) Working Group Request for Comment, https://www.lujan.senate.gov/usf/. … But were the Court to reverse the 5th Circuit, it could short-circuit Congress’s ability to clean up the mess it made when enacting Section 254.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Acting Att’y Gen’l, 405 U.S. 1000 (1972). 52. Section I(B) supra. … Ky. 1978); Comment, Developments in the Law—Zening, 91 Harv.
475 U.S. 41
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.