Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. United States Dist. Court for Eastern Dist. of Mich.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972

See also Donnelly, , Comments and Caveats About the Wire Tapping Controversy, 63 Yale L. … periods. described are as follows: ean June 19 to.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Medical Marijuana, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Douglas J. Horn

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 11, 2024

That subsection is a laundry list of acts that constitute racketeering activity, including “any act or threat involving murder[ or] kidnapping.” Id. § 1961(1)(A). … So over that ten-year period, the Department of Justice charged at least 164 people under Section 1963 with murder as the predicate offense.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Citizens for Constitutional Integrity, Petitioner v. Census Bureau, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 27, 2025

Cir. 2024) (Wilkins, J., concurring) (cleaned up). of men on account of race or color. It is in the nature of a penalty.” (Sen. H. Wilson (R-MA) commenting on predecessor version of Section 2)). … Appropriations Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105119, § 209(a)(2), 111 Stat. 2440, 2481.

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Endowment for Arts v. Finley

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

Title I of the Act amended the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. §§ 951 et seq. … A: He has a toothpick and cleans histeeth. . . Q: Did any one commission you to paint Germans, buffoons, and similar things in that picture?

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rumsfeld v. Padilla

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Air Force (1988 - 2003). During his tenure, he acted as legal advisor on law of armed conflict policy and implementation and served as law of war advisor to U.S. … All members of the U.S. military are periodically trained that commission of any prohibited acts such as those enumerated in Article 75(2) is subject to penal discipline.* Therefore, for purposes of

Amicus Curiae Brief — Koons v. Rogers

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 107, pro- vides that the “fair use” of a copyrighted work “for purposes such as criticism [or] comment... is not an infringement of copyright.” … Air Pirates, 581 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1978).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Reynaldo Gonzalez, et al., Petitioners v. Google LLC

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2022

This Court Presumes That Acts of Congress Respect Traditional State Prerogatives. … Restatement (Second) of Torts § 578, Comment b (1977).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Palazzolo v. Rhode Island

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

Comment 279 (1992)...... William A. … the law elimi- nates all of the air rights’ economically beneficial use.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Facebook, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Amalgamated Bank, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 16, 2024

This decision misunderstands the different sections of periodic SEC filings and their prescribed purposes under 6 Regulation S-K. … Reg. 63726, 63743 (Oct. 8, 2020) (“Commenters … attributed the growing length of risk factor disclosure to the fear of litigation for failing to disclose risks if events turn negative.”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Election Com'n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

of 1947, ch. 120, § 304, 61 Stat. 159-160 ...... ee eeeeee 11 Tillman Act of 1907, Pub. … However, only part of the total electioneering communications period at issue in this case was due to the primary; on September 2, or two weeks before the primary, the 60- day general election period

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jennings v. Rodriguez, 136 S. Ct. 2489 (2016) (No. 15-1204)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

The Chi- nese Exclusion Act of 1882, initially effective for only a ten-year period, was renewed in 1892 and made permanent in 1902. … That this vol- ume of history is a volume inscribed with racism and exclusion received no comment, but was implicit.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

“(c) NONCOMPLIANCE PERIOD. … of 1977, including consideration of the effect of the Clean Air Act on the need for continuing such fees.] 39a (4) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Oracle Corporation, Petitioner v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 2, 2022

Little did Oracle know that this innocuous act would end up costing it more than three billion dollars. … It is also inconsistent with what this Court has described as a core policy that the right to petition the courts seeks to vindicate: the “public airing of disputed facts.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

(CCH) { 66,167, at 66,533 (W.D.N.Y.). 3 Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1 et seq., by conspiring dur- ing a fifteen year period to “ ‘fix, raise and main- tain prices and to inhibit or eliminate competition … (amending Federal Aviation Act of 1958 “to encourage, develop, and attain an air transporta- tion system which relies on competitive market forces to deter- mine the quality, variety, and price of air

Amicus Curiae Brief — Zubik v. Burwell, 136 S. Ct. 444 (2015) (No. 14-1418)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427, 2444 (2014) (“UARG’”) (quoting FDA v. … Id. at 232-33. 6 The notice-and-comment period was deemed “impracticable, unnecessary, {and] contrary to the public interest” to ensure that college students could “benefit from the Conference of Bishops

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 17, 2023

Department of the Army, Army Air Forces Historical Division, Proposed Field Manual for Military Historians, at 13 (Feb. 15, 1949) (Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: AFHRA).8 If one substitutes the word “historian … This is true despite AFHRA’s vast archival holdings, the wide proliferation of United States Air Force historians at the Wing and Group level that periodically provide AFHRA with history reports and archival

Amicus Curiae Brief — Randall v. Sorrell

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

The Center for Governmental Studies, California Clean Money Campaign and California Women’s Agenda join the Amici listed above. … In 1997, the legislature of Vermont passed a comprehensive campaign reform act known as Act 64. 1997 Vermont Campaign Finance Reform Act, codified at VT. STAT.

Amicus Curiae Brief — M. C., et vir, Petitioners v. Indiana Department of Child Services

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 29, 2023

Granville.24 Distinguished commentator Erwin Chemerinsky has described Troxel like this: Troxel did more to confuse than clarify the law in the area of grandparents’ rights laws. … Heck, 327 F.3d 492, 519 (7th Cir. 2003) (cleaned up). 17 Indeed, that we are even discussing Troxel at all is telling since Troxel had nothing to do with a judge ordering the removal of a child.

Amicus Curiae Brief — New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Kevin P. Bruen, in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of New York State Police, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 20, 2021

(cleaned up); Wynne v. … (cleaned up); Stimmel v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Fisher v. Univ. of Tex. At Austin, 135 S. Ct. 2888 (2015) (No. 14-981)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

KOFFSKY Acting Principal Deputy General Counsel Department of Defense Washington, D.C. 20301 STEVAN E. … Dep’t of the Air Force, Air Force Policy Di- rective 36-70 (Oct. 13, 2010), http://Awww.af.