Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.90s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 19, 2026
The Clean Air Act’s savings clauses, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7416 and 7604(e), are materially parallel to the Clean Water Act savings clauses at issue in Ouellette. See City of New York v. … The majority agreed that the claims are displaced by federal common law, that any federal common law is in turn displaced by the Clean Air Act under AEP, and that the Clean Air Act’s savings clauses do
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
No. 91- SC, Ti ntecineniniettrerenmenieimeenrteieneel 2,3 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. … The Clean Air Act. The Clean Air Act amendments of 1970, Pub. L.
540 U.S. 461Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
If you have any questions of comments, please don't hesitate to cootact me. … Thus, CO: is not a pollutant, and is not, and should not, be regulated under any part of the Clean Air Act nor under any air pollution section of 40 CFR.
549 U.S. 497Amicus Curiae Brief — Sunoco LP, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024
The Clean Air Act leaves no room for a state-law claim about out-of-state, crossborder emissions. … Much like the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act leaves room for state-common-law actions only where the claim concerns an “in-state source of pollution.” Bell v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
. § 7413(a)(5) (Clean Air Act) ......... … of Recent Counsel for Amteus Cartes under §§ 113(a)(5) or 167 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7413(a)(S)(A) and 7477, to unilaterally issue orders overrid- ing a State’s BACT decision that, as here
540 U.S. 461Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
The Clean Water Act. … Davis, 932 F.2d 256, 265 (3d Cir. 1991) (citizen suits under the Clean Air Act are for the purpose of enforcing EPA standards).* * The CWA and the Clean Air Act are read in pari materia.
568 U.S. 1118Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024
. § 240.14a-9(a) ........................................... 19 Clean Air Act, 74 Fed. … Air Act, 74 Fed.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Firestone Plastics Co. v. United States Department of Labor
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Elian Ss cas acbeeuks cacbeeeeenee 9,11 Clean Air Act Amen:iments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 1857f-1 (b) (1), et seq. … Department of Transportation, 472 F.2d 659 8 Senator Muskie, the Senate sponsor of the Clean Air Act Amendments, made comments in support of the final language of that Act which are diametrically opposed
420 U.S. 1002Amicus Curiae Brief — Air Pollution Variance Bd. of Colo. v. Western Alfalfa Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
Fed- eral Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 1857c-9(a)(2)(A). The Clean Air Amendments of 1970 do not require a warrant prior to such entry. … The Federal Clean Air Act, which has entry provisions al- most identical to those of Colorado in the present case (42 U.S.C. § 1857c-9), recognizes that the control of air pollution, though a matter
416 U.S. 861Amicus Curiae Brief — Engine Mfrs. Assn. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT SCAQMD’s Fleet Rules are preempted by the Clean Air Act. … The Fleet Rules Conflict With The Purposes Of The Clean Air Act.
541 U.S. 246Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 16, 2021
Power Supply Ass'n, 577 7 U.S. 260, 266–67 (2015), and also play a lead role in air quality control under the Clean Air Act’s “cooperative federalism.” … With the Clean Air Act, Congress created comprehensive regulatory programs for two categories of pollution: “criteria pollutants” and “hazardous air pollutants.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sunoco LP, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 10, 2024
pollution or preempted by the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. … In Cooper, the Fourth Circuit held that the suit was preempted by the Clean Air Act. 615 F.3d at 301-306.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 7, 2024
Section 209 (formerly Section 208) joined the Clean Air Act through the Air Quality Act of 1967. See 81 Stat. 485, 501 (1967). … Congress did not mandate vehicle electrification through the Clean Air Act’s preemption waiver.
Amicus Curiae Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Air Act. … of the Clean Air Act.
530 U.S. 1202Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 16, 2021
In promulgating the Clean Power Plan, EPA relied on Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 7411(d). … Feb. 17, 2016. 4 expanding EPA’s regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — General Motors Corp. v. Thomas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Without notice and comment, EPA adopted a “nation- ally applicable regulation” * which extended recall and repair liability under the Clean Air Act beyond the stat- utory definition of a motor vehicle … The Clean Air Act is silent on this issue, and as EPA stated, “(t]he legislative history of the Act offers little guidance.” 45 Fed. Reg. 36,397 (1980).
471 U.S. 1074Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 26, 2024
EPA has been regulating greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act ever since the Court held in Massachusetts v. … EPA, 549 U.S. at 532, that “greenhouse gases fit well within the Clean Air Act’s capacious definition of ‘air pollutant.’”
Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021
Petitioner and Respondent both filed blanket consents. 2 STATEMENT In 1970, Congress passed the Clean Air Act, a law designed to reduce air pollution nationwide. … It would also cost billions of dollars 2 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1987: Hearings on S.300, S.321, S.1351 & S.1384 before the Subcomm. on Env’t Pro. of the Comm. on Env’t & Pub.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024
The Clean Air Act leaves no room for a state-law claim about out-of-state, crossborder emissions. … Much like the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act leaves room for state-common-law actions only where the claim concerns an “in-state source of pollution.” Bell v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
of thousands of miles of streams in the US.5> Discharges from modern mines are regulated by the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and state solid waste disposal regulations. … Clean Water Act policy.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.