Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.49s
Petitioners Brief — Gonzales v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2006
Moore, 423 U.S. 122, 142 (1975). … Moore, 423 U.S. 122 (1975).
546 U.S. 243Opinion — Davis v. Portland Seed Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1924
C. 418-421, 423; 14 I. C. C. 82. … PORTLAND SEED CO. 423 403 Opinion of the Court.
264 U.S. 403Petition — Martin Steel Corp. v. United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
Ry., 169 U.S. 92 (1898) 7 Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorf, 423 U.S. … Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336, 343 (1976). IT IS ORDERED that the petitions for writ of man- damus are denied. A true copy. Attest: CLERK; U.S.
467 U.S. 1227Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
Michelin, 423 U.S. at 285-86; Washington Stevedoring, 435 U.S. at 752-53. … See Michelin, 423 U.S. at 285.
517 U.S. 843Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sidney v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1971
Mary Lewis and Ben Sidney sold her the car (Tr. 422-423). She did not know the defendant Ben Sidney at the time of the sale (Tr. 423). Mrs. Lewis recommended the ear to her (Tr. 424). … P., 18 U.S. C. A.
401 U.S. 938Opposition Brief — Roberts v. Wooton
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
Marcum, 188 W.Va. 241, 423 S.E.2d 644 (1992) ...... 5 Cox Broadcastin . v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 46D CGGFEE 5 5 6 0 hh 6 6 ees 1 Gaither v. City Hosp., Inc., 487 S.E.2d 901 (W. … Johnson, 326 U.S. 120, 124, 65 S.Ct. 1475, 1478, 89 L.Ed. 569 (1945). Jefferson, 522 U.S. at 80-81.
528 U.S. 1117Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
'° 8. 42 U.S.C. §423(d)(1)(A) (Supp. 1997). … Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140-142 (1987). At step one, SSA determines if the claimant engaged in “substantial gainful activity;” if so, the claim is denied. 20 C.F.R. 404.1520(b), 416.920(b).
526 U.S. 795Amicus Brief for the United States — Reed v. Ross
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief for the United States · 1984
North Carolina, 482 U.S. at 248 n.2 (Powell, J. concurring). … California, 393 U.S. at 315. 28 Jackson v. Denno, 878 U.S. at 878; see id. at 411-423 (Appendix A to opinion of Black, J., dissenting in part and concurring in part). Bruton v.
468 U.S. 1Petition — Kananen v. Califano
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
Renner, U.S. Attorney Meil I. Dickstein, A.U.S.D.A. 596 U.S. Court House 110 So. 4th St. … Instead S 424a refers back to S 423, which defines disability as the inability to engage in substantial gainful activity. 42 U.S.C. S 423(d) (1).
434 U.S. 939Amicus Brief — Bell v. Wolfish
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1979
Collier, 390 F.Supp. 482 (N.D.Miss. 1975) . Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 US. 254 (1969) Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 (1956) . Guajardo v. … Collier, 390 F.Supp. 482, 494 (N.D. Miss. 1975).
441 U.S. 520Memorandum — UNITED STATES v. LOUISIANA (No. 0026-74)
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1955
Louisiana, 364 U.S. 502, 503; Jbid., 382 U.S. 288, 289; United States v. Cali- fornia, 382 U.S. 448, 452. … 389 U.S. 155 at 160.
Appendix B — Harrison v. Howard University
Supreme Court brief · Appendix B · 1995
Marvel, 423 A.2d 196, 198 (D.C. 1980). … of the U.S.
516 U.S. 821Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Microsoft Corp. v. Vizcaino
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Field, 311 U.S. 169 (1940), and West v. … AT&T, 311 U.S. 223, 236 (1940).
522 U.S. 1098Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 9, 2018
Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)...............12 Brown v Sjacuse, 623 F Supp2d 272 (NDNY2009). ....... 30 Caperton vATMassey Coal Go, 556 US 868 (2009)...........23 City of Houston vHill, 482 US … Amend l ........................................................................ 6 U.S.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Safir v. Blackwell
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
Supp. 423 (S. D. N. Y. 1967). … Supp. 423 (S. D. N. Y. 1967).
414 U.S. 975Elimination of FERC Form No. 423
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 20, 2007
FERC , 535 U.S. 1 (2002). 6 A review of data from the Electric Quarterly Reports for calendar year 2006 indicates that market-based power sales constituted ninety percent of jurisdictional … The Commission seeks comments both on its proposal to eliminate the Form 423, and on the date the Commission proposes to eliminate the Form 423. Information Collection Statement 10.
72 FR 65246Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Harkins v. Interstate Motor Freight Systems
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1984
Teamsters Local 832, 514 F.2d 442 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 (March 18, 1975). … Supp. 482, 487 (N.D.
469 U.S. 870Petition — Jarrett v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
United States, 411 U.S. 233, 255) (Marshall, J., dissenting) To hold otherwise is simply to apply “an airtight system of forfeitures” (Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 482). … (a Hobbs Act case), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1014 (1975), and United States v.
465 U.S. 1004Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Schwimmer v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
Gartner, $18 F.2d 633, 637 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 915 (1975). … Jn re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 (1973); von Bulow v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 146 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 (1987).
502 U.S. 810Brief for Respondent — Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1944
Hartford-Empire Company, in which cer- 8 — has also been granted, No. 423 at this Term. The earlier decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals. … Shawkee’s brief at No. 423. ° a not because of the Clarke artiele, but on proof of Peiler’s priority over a Howard patent.
322 U.S. 238
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.