Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
6,243 results
1.21s
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 8, 2008 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
for that period. … Comment Date: February 1, 2008.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionConformed to Federal Register Version
Agency decision · Agency decision
Some commenters argued that the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”) is the proper regulatory regime for proxy voting advice businesses, and that the Advisers Act and an investment adviser … processes do not currently compromise the independence of their advice the Proposed Rule’s review and comment period for all public companies would do so.”); BIO; ExxonMobil. 259 74 Several commenters
Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
The document will satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. … The comment period for the NOI closed on June 24, 2005. Transco has recently identified two new potential compressor station sites in Middlesex County, New Jersey.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Agency decision · Agency decision
Ths new rule permits closed-end management investment companies and business development companies that periodically repurchase their shares in accordace with Rule 23c-3 under the Investment Company Act … DISCLOSUR COMMENTS ,; A.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Proposed Plan could submit their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the Notice. … The Commission received no comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment period. On May 12, 2022, the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to 1 2 Exchange Act Rel.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Proposed Plan could submit their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the Notice. … The Commission received no comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment period. On September 3, 2020, the Secretary, pursuant to delegated 1 2 Exchange Act Rel.
Securities and Exchange CommissionManaging Director, Head of Derivatives Policy
Agency decision · Agency decision
Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission under section 15F(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 18a-7 thereunder … To respond to the commenter’s concerns, as well as to promote harmonization with prudential regulators’ requirements, the Commission is adopting a thirty calendar-day requirement as requested by the commenter
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
For 2008, the periods are split around June 18, 2008, when the HEART Act’s mark-to-market tax provisions went into place. … In the few periods prior to the HEART Act change, the number of renouncers reporting net worth of $622K-$2M and above $2M increased noticeably.
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
period; • A “fundraising exemption,” which would exempt offerings of up to $75 million from the registration requirements of the Securities Act during each 12-month period; • An “investment contract … Additional Information: The public comment period will remain open for 60 days following the date of publication of the proposing release in the Federal Register. U.S.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax Court
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.