Regulation Crypto Assets
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
FACT SHEET
Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) proposed rules, titled “Regulation
Crypto Assets,” to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving
crypto assets (“covered investment contracts”). The proposed rules include:
•
A “startup exemption,” which would exempt offerings of up to $5 million from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) during a fouryear period;
•
A “fundraising exemption,” which would exempt offerings of up to $75 million from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act during each 12-month period;
•
An “investment contract safe harbor,” which would provide a conditional safe harbor
from the term “investment contract” in the definitions of “security” in the Securities Act
and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”); and
•
A definition of “qualified purchaser” for purposes of the Securities Act, which would
preempt state securities law registration and qualification requirements with respect to
offers and sales of covered investment contracts issued pursuant to Regulation Crypto
Assets, as well as certain secondary market transactions.
Background
The crypto asset markets have grown significantly since the advent of Bitcoin in 2008, but the
Commission has not adapted its rules to address the unique aspects of this asset class. Without fit-forpurpose rules, existing regulatory requirements, many of which were adopted well before the
proliferation of crypto assets, could complicate an issuer’s transaction planning and, in turn, impede
capital formation and innovation in the crypto asset markets. Furthermore, in response to these
regulatory challenges, some issuers may choose to conduct their crypto asset transactions offshore,
limiting investment options for U.S. investors or exposing them to additional risks from participating in
markets with less robust investor protections.
Recently, the Commission took steps to start addressing these concerns. In March, the Commission
issued an interpretive release clarifying how the federal securities laws apply to certain crypto assets
and transactions involving crypto assets, which complements Congressional endeavors to codify a
comprehensive market structure framework.
Building on this interpretation, Regulation Crypto Assets would provide a tailored offering regime for
covered investment contracts. The proposed rules are intended to facilitate capital formation and
accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that
investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed
investment decisions.
Startup Exemption
The startup exemption would be a one-time, non-exclusive exemption from Securities Act registration
requirements. It would permit issuers to conduct offerings of covered investment contracts of up to $5
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
PAGE 1 OF 3
FACT SHEET | Regulation Crypto Assets
million, during a period of up to four years, if they satisfy certain conditions. Those conditions include
making public filings at the beginning and end of such period as well as making certain principlesbased narrative disclosures available to their investors during such period.
The startup exemption is intended to provide issuers with temporary relief from Securities Act
registration requirements—during which time they may work towards fulfilling the essential managerial
efforts they represented or promised investors they would engage in under the covered investment
contract—while, at the same time, ensuring that investors remain sufficiently protected and informed.
Issuers that rely on the exemption would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation
provisions of the federal securities laws.
Fundraising Exemption
The fundraising exemption would be a non-exclusive, two-tier exemption from Securities Act
registration requirements, modeled in part on Regulation A. Under Tier 1, issuers would be permitted
to conduct offerings of up to $20 million of covered investment contracts in a twelve-month period.
Under Tier 2, issuers would be permitted to conduct offerings of up to $75 million of covered investment
contracts in a twelve-month period. Issuers relying on this exemption would be required to publicly file
offering materials consisting of the same principles-based narrative disclosures required under the
startup exemption, a discussion of the issuer’s financial condition, and financial statements (which, for
Tier 2 offerings, would be required to be audited). Issuers also would be subject to ongoing reporting
requirements modeled on analogous provisions in Regulation A, tailored to offerings of covered
investment contracts.
The fundraising exemption is intended to facilitate larger capital raising transactions for covered
investment contract issuers than would be permitted under the startup exemption. Issuers that rely on
the exemption would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the federal
securities laws.
Investment Contract Safe Harbor
The investment contract safe harbor would provide a conditional safe harbor from the term
“investment contract” in the definitions of “security” in the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.
If the conditions of the safe harbor were satisfied, then a covered investment contract would be
deemed by the Commission to have ceased to exist, and the crypto asset that was subject to
the covered investment contract would be deemed by the Commission not to constitute or
represent or to be subject to such investment contract for purposes of those statutory definitions
of “security.”
An issuer of a covered investment contract would satisfy the investment contract safe harbor if
it has: (1) completed or otherwise permanently ceased all essential managerial efforts that it
represented or promised it would engage in under the covered investment contract and is not
making and does not intend to make any new representations or promises to engage in essential
managerial efforts with respect to the underlying crypto asset; and (2) made a public filing
certifying that it has satisfied the conditions of the safe harbor and providing an analysis
supporting that certification.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
PAGE 2 OF 3
FACT SHEET | Regulation Crypto Assets
The investment contract safe harbor builds on the recent Commission interpretation and would
provide market participants greater clarity as to when a covered investment contract has ceased
to exist because of a lack of essential managerial efforts and, therefore, the crypto asset is no
longer subject to an investment contract.
Preemption of State Registration and Qualification Requirements
Finally, the proposed rules would add a definition of “qualified purchaser” under the Securities
Act such that state securities law registration and qualification requirements would be preempted
with respect to offers and sales of covered investment contracts pursuant to an exemption in
Regulation Crypto Assets.
With respect to secondary market transactions by any person other than an issuer, underwriter,
or dealer, the proposed amendments would preempt state securities law registration and
qualification requirements for covered investment contracts that were initially sold by the issuer
either pursuant to an exemption in Regulation Crypto Assets or another exemption under the
federal securities laws. Such secondary market preemption would continue for the period during
which the issuer continues to satisfy the information and filing and/or periodic reporting
requirements of an exemption under Regulation Crypto Assets for that covered investment
contract.
Additional Information:
The public comment period will remain open for 60 days following the date of publication of the
proposing release in the Federal Register.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
PAGE 3 OF 3
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.