Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.08s
Amicus Curiae Brief — New York Times Co. v. Tasini
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
No. 00-201 Supreme ap Ics IN THE AiR 2% op Supreme Court of valor Hnitep States THE NEW YORK TIMES ears INC.; NEWSDAY, INC.; THE TIME INCORPORATED MAGAZINE COMPANY; LEXIS/NEXIS and UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS … The boundless breadth of the decision appears, astonishingly, to mean that storage of any given issue from any given periodical with issues of other periodicals, or even with other issues of that same
533 U.S. 483Amicus Curiae Brief — Advance Chemical Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
§ 1 et seq. 5 comment, and then a final Record of Decision (“ROD”) documenting EPA’s final decision. The ROD states gen- erally the goals and method of the EPA selected cleanup. … See, e.g., 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732 (False Claims Act); 41 U.S.C. $ 604 (Contracts Disputes Act).
510 U.S. 913Amicus Curiae Brief — Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. v. PACIFIC GAS
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Wolens, 513 U.S. 219, 228-229 (1995) (Airline Deregulation Act, which preempts state regulation of air carrier services, did not preempt state-law breach of con- tract claims filed by passengers against … Mass. 1997) (Section 20%a) of the Clean Air Act, which pre- empted all state “standards” regarding vehicle emissions, did not apply to private Memoranda of Understanding between state agency and private
549 U.S. 443Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2019
No other court has adopted such a novel reading of the Mineral Leasing Act (“MLA”) or National Trails System Act (“NTSA”). … This level of investment equates to an average annual CAPEX of $44 billion throughout the projection period.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
(“ADA” or “Act”), including a nationally consistent interpretation of the concept of disability covered by the Act. … United Air Lines, No. 97-1943 (filed June 1, 1998). 11 fl.
527 U.S. 555Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Accordingly, amici par- ties regularly employ the citizen suit provisions of environ- mental laws (such as the Clean Water Act (CWA)) to enforce those laws. … United States, 481 U.S. 412 (1987), and other cases discussing the deterrent value of civil penalties, and (4) the Laidlaw opinion eliminates a remedy authorized by Congress in the Clean Water Act (
528 U.S. 167Amicus Curiae Brief — El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Neztsosie
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
ATOMIC ENERGY COMM’N CONTRACTS: FINAL REP’T, (1982)... 6 Fredric Brandfon, Comment, Tradition and Judi- cial Review in the American Indian Tribal Court System, 38 UCLA L. … During most of this period, the federal government was the only buyer for uranium concentrate. The first private sale of uranium concentrate occurred in 1966, under a license from the AEC.
526 U.S. 473Amicus Curiae Brief — Rust v. Sullivan
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
To this comment must be added another of Justice Mar- shall’s remarks in the case of Cohens v. … Ct. at 2977,°, the Minnesota 48-hour waiting period, Hodgson, 110S. ’ The plurality employed the rational-basis test explicitly in several pas- sages, e.g., “the Legislature acted in a rational manner
500 U.S. 173Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 17, 2023
(i) ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page(s) Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Tr. Fund. v. … Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Tr. Fund. v. Ferbar Corp. of Cal., 522 U.S. 192, 201 (1997) (quoting Rawlings v. Ray, 312 U.S. 96, 98 (1941)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
WE WERE PREPARED TO ASSUME ALL OF THAT IS TRUE FOR PURPOSES OF THE COMPLAINT, THEY ACTED AT THE INITIA- TIVE OF THE GOVERNMENT. AT THE BE- HEST OF THE GOVERNMENT. THE COURT: THANK YOU. … Section 40119(b) can be found in 14 CFR 191.7(b) which exempts from disclosure security directives, information circulars, and any comments, instructions, or implementing guid- ance pertaining thereto
542 U.S. 177Amicus Curiae Brief — Republic of Sudan v. Harrison, 138 S. Ct. 293 (2017) (No. 16-1094)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Such “decisions of the court of other Convention signatories,” El Al Israel Air- lines Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng, 525 U.S. 155, 175 (1999), are entitled to “considerable weight.” Air France v. … As counselor, she supervised the State Department's comments on what became the Restatement of U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Simpson Paper (Vermont) Co. v. Department of Environmental Conservation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
), 16 U.S.C. § 803 G)(1)-(2) «1. ee ee ee eee 13 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED - Continued Statutes - Continued Page CLEAN WATER ACT, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (1986 & Supp. 1992) O00, Se Ue, BRO … In Williams, the highest court of New York held: The certification referred to in the Federal Clean Water Act . . . is simply of compliance with section 303 of the Federal statute... .
507 U.S. 970Amicus Curiae Brief — Amber Lavigne, Petitioner v. Great Salt Bay Community School Board
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 23, 2026
Instead, it dismissed the complaint at the pleading stage by crediting the school board’s asserted alternative explanation, namely, that its officials were merely interpreting state law rather than acting … Courts and commentators have warned that plausibility review can be misapplied in ways that resemble summary judgment-style comparative inference analysis. See A.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
That plan was prepared and adopted by TRPA, certified by California and Nevada, and approved by the federal Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to section 208 of the federal Clean Water Act. (33 … (Water Transfer Act of 1986).) Among the vital elements of the Wilson Administration’s current waterpolicy are water marketing and transfers.
520 U.S. 725Amicus Curiae Brief — Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
EEG RECN sce nccccccccccsccsccccccccs passim Other Materials Comment: Here's Justice, The New Yorker, Oct. 11, 1993. The D.C. … Comment: Here's Justice, The New Yorker, Oct. 11, 1993, at 8.
512 U.S. 622Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2019
Air Regulatory Grp. v. … The court followed Montana Air Chapter No. 29 v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Roxanne Torres, Petitioner v. Janice Madrid, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 6, 2020
To the contrary, those rules persisted in a stable form over 13 long periods of time. See infra Part II. … Indeed, “every American statesman, during our revolutionary period and formative period as a nation, was undoubtedly familiar” with these “landmarks of English liberty,” which had a powerful effect on
Amicus Curiae Brief — Daniel Grand, Petitioner v. City of University Heights, Ohio, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 8, 2026
Pet.App.7a (cleaned up). “Of course, Congress always has the option of imposing” such a finality requirement on RLUIPA claims, “[b]ut it has not done so.” Pakdel v. … Court recognized in those cases, “attending religious services” is conduct “at the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty,” and preventing such attendance, “for even minimal periods
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2025
Ct. at 2359 (cleaned up). … (cleaned up)); ibid.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Ferring B.V. v. Meijer, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
If, however, Plaintiffs succeed on their Walker Process claim, they would be entitled to damages for the injury period starting in 2001 at the beginning of the class period. Pet. … Stierwalt Abbott Laboratories ConocoPhillips Thierry Sueur Air Liquide
561 U.S. 1038
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.