Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.08s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — New York Times Co. v. Tasini

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    No. 00-201 Supreme ap Ics IN THE AiR 2% op Supreme Court of valor Hnitep States THE NEW YORK TIMES ears INC.; NEWSDAY, INC.; THE TIME INCORPORATED MAGAZINE COMPANY; LEXIS/NEXIS and UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS … The boundless breadth of the decision appears, astonishingly, to mean that storage of any given issue from any given periodical with issues of other periodicals, or even with other issues of that same

    533 U.S. 483
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Advance Chemical Co. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

    § 1 et seq. 5 comment, and then a final Record of Decision (“ROD”) documenting EPA’s final decision. The ROD states gen- erally the goals and method of the EPA selected cleanup. … See, e.g., 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732 (False Claims Act); 41 U.S.C. $ 604 (Contracts Disputes Act).

    510 U.S. 913
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. v. PACIFIC GAS

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    Wolens, 513 U.S. 219, 228-229 (1995) (Airline Deregulation Act, which preempts state regulation of air carrier services, did not preempt state-law breach of con- tract claims filed by passengers against … Mass. 1997) (Section 20%a) of the Clean Air Act, which pre- empted all state “standards” regarding vehicle emissions, did not apply to private Memoranda of Understanding between state agency and private

    549 U.S. 443
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — United States Forest Service, et al., Petitioners v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2019

    No other court has adopted such a novel reading of the Mineral Leasing Act (“MLA”) or National Trails System Act (“NTSA”). … This level of investment equates to an average annual CAPEX of $44 billion throughout the projection period.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

    (“ADA” or “Act”), including a nationally consistent interpretation of the concept of disability covered by the Act. … United Air Lines, No. 97-1943 (filed June 1, 1998). 11 fl.

    527 U.S. 555
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

    Accordingly, amici par- ties regularly employ the citizen suit provisions of environ- mental laws (such as the Clean Water Act (CWA)) to enforce those laws. … United States, 481 U.S. 412 (1987), and other cases discussing the deterrent value of civil penalties, and (4) the Laidlaw opinion eliminates a remedy authorized by Congress in the Clean Water Act (

    528 U.S. 167
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Neztsosie

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

    ATOMIC ENERGY COMM’N CONTRACTS: FINAL REP’T, (1982)... 6 Fredric Brandfon, Comment, Tradition and Judi- cial Review in the American Indian Tribal Court System, 38 UCLA L. … During most of this period, the federal government was the only buyer for uranium concentrate. The first private sale of uranium concentrate occurred in 1966, under a license from the AEC.

    526 U.S. 473
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Rust v. Sullivan

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

    To this comment must be added another of Justice Mar- shall’s remarks in the case of Cohens v. … Ct. at 2977,°, the Minnesota 48-hour waiting period, Hodgson, 110S. ’ The plurality employed the rational-basis test explicitly in several pas- sages, e.g., “the Legislature acted in a rational manner

    500 U.S. 173
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Corner Post, Inc., Petitioner v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 17, 2023

    (i) ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page(s) Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Tr. Fund. v. … Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Tr. Fund. v. Ferbar Corp. of Cal., 522 U.S. 192, 201 (1997) (quoting Rawlings v. Ray, 312 U.S. 96, 98 (1941)).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

    WE WERE PREPARED TO ASSUME ALL OF THAT IS TRUE FOR PURPOSES OF THE COMPLAINT, THEY ACTED AT THE INITIA- TIVE OF THE GOVERNMENT. AT THE BE- HEST OF THE GOVERNMENT. THE COURT: THANK YOU. … Section 40119(b) can be found in 14 CFR 191.7(b) which exempts from disclosure security directives, information circulars, and any comments, instructions, or implementing guid- ance pertaining thereto

    542 U.S. 177
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Republic of Sudan v. Harrison, 138 S. Ct. 293 (2017) (No. 16-1094)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

    Such “decisions of the court of other Convention signatories,” El Al Israel Air- lines Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng, 525 U.S. 155, 175 (1999), are entitled to “considerable weight.” Air France v. … As counselor, she supervised the State Department's comments on what became the Restatement of U.S.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Simpson Paper (Vermont) Co. v. Department of Environmental Conservation

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

    ), 16 U.S.C. § 803 G)(1)-(2) «1. ee ee ee eee 13 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED - Continued Statutes - Continued Page CLEAN WATER ACT, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (1986 & Supp. 1992) O00, Se Ue, BRO … In Williams, the highest court of New York held: The certification referred to in the Federal Clean Water Act . . . is simply of compliance with section 303 of the Federal statute... .

    507 U.S. 970
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Amber Lavigne, Petitioner v. Great Salt Bay Community School Board

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 23, 2026

    Instead, it dismissed the complaint at the pleading stage by crediting the school board’s asserted alternative explanation, namely, that its officials were merely interpreting state law rather than acting … Courts and commentators have warned that plausibility review can be misapplied in ways that resemble summary judgment-style comparative inference analysis. See A.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

    That plan was prepared and adopted by TRPA, certified by California and Nevada, and approved by the federal Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to section 208 of the federal Clean Water Act. (33 … (Water Transfer Act of 1986).) Among the vital elements of the Wilson Administration’s current waterpolicy are water marketing and transfers.

    520 U.S. 725
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

    EEG RECN sce nccccccccccsccsccccccccs passim Other Materials Comment: Here's Justice, The New Yorker, Oct. 11, 1993. The D.C. … Comment: Here's Justice, The New Yorker, Oct. 11, 1993, at 8.

    512 U.S. 622
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners v. Regents of the University of California, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2019

    Air Regulatory Grp. v. … The court followed Montana Air Chapter No. 29 v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Roxanne Torres, Petitioner v. Janice Madrid, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 6, 2020

    To the contrary, those rules persisted in a stable form over 13 long periods of time. See infra Part II. … Indeed, “every American statesman, during our revolutionary period and formative period as a nation, was undoubtedly familiar” with these “landmarks of English liberty,” which had a powerful effect on

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Daniel Grand, Petitioner v. City of University Heights, Ohio, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 8, 2026

    Pet.App.7a (cleaned up). “Of course, Congress always has the option of imposing” such a finality requirement on RLUIPA claims, “[b]ut it has not done so.” Pakdel v. … Court recognized in those cases, “attending religious services” is conduct “at the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty,” and preventing such attendance, “for even minimal periods

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Ferring B.V. v. Meijer, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

    If, however, Plaintiffs succeed on their Walker Process claim, they would be entitled to damages for the injury period starting in 2001 at the beginning of the class period. Pet. … Stierwalt Abbott Laboratories ConocoPhillips Thierry Sueur Air Liquide

    561 U.S. 1038

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.