Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,113 results
0.07s
Opposition Brief — Production Plated Plastics, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656 RTE aE oats cn nt codes ag samaksacdabssmioasdomaunabieanenvins 12 Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. Vv. Wolf Bros. & Co., 260 US. 261 (1916) ............... 7 Joslyn Mfg. … Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656, 665 (1987).
506 U.S. 820Opposition Brief — Aiuppa v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988
McGowan, 423 F.2d 413 (4th Cir. 1970) . 10 United States v. Meester, 762 F.2d 867 (11th Cir.), cert. nmin, GPO UG. TRO CIO a nn os hc kc csc eeawdesass 15 United States v. Miller, 552 F. … McGowan, 423 F.2d 413, 415-417 (4th Cir. 1970).3 - The analysis is no different even where, as here, peti- tioners’ convictions on the substantive counts may have rested, under Pinkerton, on their
486 U.S. 1006Opposition Brief — Michael Harper, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Nov 9, 2023
Ware, 964 F.3d 482 (6th Cir. 2020) ......................................... 12, 13 United States v. White, 984 F.3d 76 (D.C. … Ware, 964 F.3d 482, 488-489 (6th Cir. 2020).2 The practical significance of that limited and lopsided conflict is minimal.
Opposition Brief — Park v. Howard University
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 (1978). … Corp., 755 F.2d 20, 23-24 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 851 (1985); Chisolm v. United States Postal Serv., 665 F.2d 482, 491 (4th Cir. 1981); Ostapowicz v.
519 U.S. 811Opposition Brief — Alameida v. Mayweathers
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2003
Safley, 482 US. 78 (1987) vsccscssesssecscsvssecvsssvensenes 11 United States v Grossi, 143 F.3d 348 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 US. 87B.C1GGB) .......sscsssssssesessonanovevsveeseseee 13 United … Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), or prisoners’ First Amendment claims under Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987).
540 U.S. 815Opposition Brief — New Mexico Ex Rel. Ortiz v. Reed
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998
Superior Court of California, 482 US. Gee Gd ckssrencneageblnnwhdessnhsiaesdehomicos 10 , £e 8 FS Ff eee 16 Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970)................ 11 Michigan v. … Superior Court of California, 482 U.S. 400 (1987) and Puerto Rico v. Branstad, Governor of Iowa, et al., 483 U.S 219 (1987) is equally unavailing.
524 U.S. 151Opposition Brief — National Union Fire Insurance v. Camp, 113 S. Ct. 1366 (1993) (No. 92-1046)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Hollins, 241 U.S. 523 (1916) ou... Duignan v. United States, 274 U.S. 195 (1927) .... me National Bank v. … Associated Underwriters, Inc., 423 F.Supp. SOB Gk. SPR SEE Withsennsaseiiaiacemnens 5 SIPC v. Barbour, 421 U.S. 412 (1975) .................. 2,3 SIPC v. Charisma Sec.
Opposition Brief — Tarapacki v. New Jersey ReInsurance Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
Thomas, 482 U.S. 483 (1987) ............. 10 Preiser v. Newkirk, 422 U.S. 395 (1975) ........... 9 Radio Station WOW v. … Thomas, 482 U.S. 483, 492 and n. 9 (1987) (refusing to decide standing and unenforceability issues not raised below); Cardinale v.
520 U.S. 1143Opposition Brief — American Home Products Corp. v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
App. at 528, 873 P.2d at 423 (emphasis added by the court of appeals). … Awards of punitive damages do not impli- cate these concerns.’ 492 U.S. at 259, 109 S. Ct. at 2912.” Tenold, 127 Or. App. at 528, 873 P.2d at 423 (emphasis added by the court of appeals).
528 U.S. 1136Opposition Brief — Berkley v. Itoba Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
Arthur Andersen & Co., 423 U.S. 1018 (1975)........... 16 Commissioner v. Scottish Amer. Inv. Co., 323 U.S. 119 0 RS Oe a ee ree nee 14 Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. … Arthur Andersen & Co., 423 U.S. 1018 (1975) and Alfadda v. Fenn, 935 F.2d 475 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1005 (1991).
516 U.S. 1044Opposition Brief — Adkins v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
Hasting, 461 U.S. 499 ...... United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783 ...... United States v. Scott, 668 F.2d 384 ........ Constitution, statutes and rules: U.S. Const. Amend. … Hasting, 461 U.S. 499 (1983). DOJ-1985-03
471 U.S. 1053Opposition Brief — Colon v. Division of Human Rights
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974
Jordan, —— U.S. —— (March 23, 1974), i CD on ncwnnccesoooesseces 5 Francisco Enterprises v. Kirby, 482 F. 2d 481 (9th i Mn siccctcsocenbaneeeeisusdusaeéoebns 6 Fuld v. Elliot, US. … Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); Angel v. Bullington, 330 U.S. 18 (1947); Francisco Enterprises v. Kirby, 482 F. 2d 481 (9th Cir. 1973); Tang v.
417 U.S. 946Opposition Brief — Futernick v. Caterino
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
Jordan, 440 U.S. 332 (1979) .....cccccccccccccccceececeeeee... 9 Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362 (1976)......cccccceccceceocecoceceeees.. 12 Seigert v. … Goode, 423 U.S. 362 (1976), which rejected equitable relief under 42 U.S.C.
519 U.S. 928Opposition Brief — New Orleans Steamship Ass'n v. Plaquemines Port, Harbor & Terminal District
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
Mississippi, 466 U.S. 96, 104 S.Ct. 1645, 80 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).................. — Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, 423 U.S. 276, 96 S.Ct. … Td at 1020. 44. 435 U.S. 734, 752-53, 98 S.Ct. 1388, 1400-01, 55 L.Ed.2d 682,698-99 (1978). 45. 423 U.S. 276, 285-86, 96 S.Ct. 535, 540, 46 L.Ed.2d 495, 503 (1976). 46. 974 F.2d 1018, 1023. 18 ARGUMENT
495 U.S. 932Opposition Brief — Big Apple Industrial Buildings, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
Campanale, 518 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 (1976) ........... 20 United States v. Hawes, 529 F.2d 472 (Sth Cir. 1976) .. 20 United States v. … denied, 423 U.S. 1050 (1976) (§ 1962 as a whole not vague and terms ‘‘enterprise’’ and ‘‘person’’ not vague in particular); United States v.
493 U.S. 1022Opposition Brief — Willie Seth Crain, Jr., Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Dec 20, 2018
Hlinois Dept. of Revenue, 482 U.S. 182 (1987)... eecccccsseeseseesscssscssecsessacsesseesssesssssenscsseseeeaceneecsuesecccesessacessvanssseesseasseseases 6 Romano v. … Illinois Dept. of Revenue, 482 U.S. 182, 184, n. 3 (1987); Braxton v. United States, 500 U.S. 344, 348 (1991). Crain fails to present a compelling reason for this Court to grant certiorari review.’
Opposition Brief — Hurst v. Texas Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services (No. 06-1720)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
This decision was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Hurst v. Texas Dep't of Assistive & Rehab. Serv., 482 F.3d 809 (Sth Cir. 2007). … Serv., 482 F.3d 809, 814 (Sth Cir. 2007). 4 REASONS FOR DENYING THE PETITION Ms. Hurst’s petition attempts to take the settled law of this Court and turn it on its head.
Opposition Brief — Brewer v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1955
United States, 323 U.S. RR eee Pereira v. United States, 347 U. … OES tht heh Phe ee ee a Miscellaneous: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rules 30 and 52(b) 38608364008 0064665046666 (1) — Guthe Supreme Court of the United States OcToBeR TERM, 1955 No. 482
350 U.S. 901Opposition Brief — Stone v. Williams
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336, 96 S.Ct. 584, 46 L.Ed.2d 542 (1976)........... 19 | vi V. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (Cont.) … Hermansdorfer, 423 US. 336, 96 S.Ct. 584, 46 L.Ed.2d 542 (1976); New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer, 440 U.S. 568, 570, 99 S.Ct. 1355, 59 L.Ed.2d 587, 593 (1979); Hagans v.
493 U.S. 959Opposition Brief — Maslenjak v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 809 (2017) (No. 16-309)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2017
Shabani, 513 U.S. 10 (1994) 0... cece eee i) United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997)................ 8, 9, 10 (IIT) Case— Continued: Page United States v. Youssef, 547 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. … Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 490 (1997) (de- clining to infer materiality requirement where statute, 18 U.S.C. 1014, prohibited making a false statement 9 for the purpose of influencing the actions of a bank
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.