Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.20s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
(cleaned up)). … Id. at 373 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Article 17 * Similarly, Article 18 provides that, as to baggage and goods, transportation by air generally “comprise[s] the period during which the baggage or goods are in charge of the car- rier, … within the scope of his employment, acts with “willful misconduct”); Montreal Protocol No. 4, Arts.
525 U.S. 155Amicus Curiae Brief — Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Sie Gsutst const Bad any ont is after Lampf. and still anot restored the My so limitations period. … But the doctrine of Mayberts Cam Giiitly in SONS en eameen Se prospective judgments (¢.g., Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Vann S.S.
514 U.S. 211Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
CASES Army & Air Force Exchange Service v. … See also Army & Air Force Exchange Service v.
537 U.S. 465Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2020
. § 1802 ........................................................14 Defense Production Act of 1950 ................................11 Defense Production Act of 1950, Pub. L. … He has held numerous commands and served in significant staff positions in the Air Force.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alamo Bank of Texas v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
The post-indictment *“This has been a period of great change and challenge in the corporate law of depository institutions.” I. M. Malloy, The Corporate Law of Banks (1988), at xviii. … This statute specifically sets forth the only conditions under which a PRP is liable for such clean up costs, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(b).
493 U.S. 1071Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 11, 2023
Id. at 2610 (quoting Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014)). … Ct. at 2612 (quoting Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 234).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2025
Hoston, Black Legislative Politics: Examining the Issue of Voting Rights in the Post-Hurricane Katrina Period, 49 SOC. SCI. … Home to more than 200 petrochemical plants and refineries, the region’s estimated cancer risks from air pollution exceed federal thresholds.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Florence County School Dist. Four v. Carter
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
App. 3a, 24a. 4 receive individualized instruction for three periods per week. … Observing that the IEP’s goal of “four months progress over a period of more than one year was rather modest” and “failed to satisfy the Act’s requirement of more than minimal or trivial progress,”
510 U.S. 7Amicus Curiae Brief — Gonzales v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
hasten impending death by patients who previously could not make use of the ODWDA: Tania Bloom writes of her father’s death by gunshot: “My son-in-law had the unfortunate and unpleasant task of cleaning … Over a short period of time, she lost the ability to walk and to swallow whole foods. Breathing became more and more difficult, as the muscles in her chest weakened.
546 U.S. 243Amicus Curiae Brief — Perpich v. Department of Defense
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
.... 5, 6 Act of January 21, 19038, ch. 196, 32 Stat. 775... 6, 7 National Defense Act of 1916, ch. 134, 39 Stat. … Act of May 8, 1792, ch. 33, §1, 1 Stat. 271.
496 U.S. 334Amicus Curiae Brief — Advance Chemical Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
§ 1 et seq. 5 comment, and then a final Record of Decision (“ROD”) documenting EPA’s final decision. The ROD states gen- erally the goals and method of the EPA selected cleanup. … See, e.g., 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732 (False Claims Act); 41 U.S.C. $ 604 (Contracts Disputes Act).
510 U.S. 913Amicus Curiae Brief — Conroy v. Aniskoff
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Secretary of the Air Force, No. 90- 1168 (Nov. 12, 1991) ORES 17 United States v. … Secretary of the Air Force, No, 90-1168 (Nov. 12, 1991) (947 F.2d 942 (Table) ).
507 U.S. 511Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 23, 2025
Virgin Islands reported 954 Army National Guard and 29 Air National Guard personnel mobilized for Fiscal Year 1989.” Id. … to execute federal law does not violate the Posse Comitatus Act when (1) an act of Congress expressly authorizes use of part of the Army or Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the law
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2019
No other court has adopted such a novel reading of the Mineral Leasing Act (“MLA”) or National Trails System Act (“NTSA”). … This level of investment equates to an average annual CAPEX of $44 billion throughout the projection period.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Accordingly, amici par- ties regularly employ the citizen suit provisions of environ- mental laws (such as the Clean Water Act (CWA)) to enforce those laws. … United States, 481 U.S. 412 (1987), and other cases discussing the deterrent value of civil penalties, and (4) the Laidlaw opinion eliminates a remedy authorized by Congress in the Clean Water Act (
528 U.S. 167Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
(“CLEAN”) and Sierra Club should be parties in this action. CLEAN and Sierra Club never filed 60-day notice letters and, therefore, should not be parties. 33 U.S.C.A. § 1365(b) (1986). … In response, the Petitioners submit a lengthy argument that the Fourth Circuit decision is “of devastating consequence to citizen suits under the Clean Water Act and other environmental statutes,” “
528 U.S. 167Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Ciraolo
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
This act put the police (and everyone else) on notice that Mr. Ciraolo had demarcated an area of privacy. … As one court stated: “We take this first factor to mean in essence that the defendant must have acted in such a way that it would have been reasonable for him to expect that he would not be observed
476 U.S. 207Amicus Curiae Brief — Auer v. Robbins
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Law Enforcement Officers Who are "Subject to" Non- Safety Disciplinary Suspensions for Periods of Less Than a Full Work Period are Non-Exempt Hourly II. … Cobb & Rose, Hypertension, Peptic Ulcer, and Diabetes in Air Traffic Controllers, 224(4) J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 489 (1973).
519 U.S. 452Amicus Curiae Brief — Richard Devillier, et al., Petitioners v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2023
Cir. 2011) (government seized airplanes that were under contract to Air Columbia); Nixon v. United States, 978 F.2d 1269 (D.C. … Federal and state clean energy policies, including the tax incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act, have resulted in increased demand for such pore spaces.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.