Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.10s
Reply Brief — Nancy Avina, Petitioner v. Union Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 5, 2023
Pet. 2-3, 19, 23-24, 25. … Pet. 23-24 (citing Tice v.
Reply Brief — Karolyn Givens, et al., Petitioners v. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 6, 2019
Pet. 23-24, 27. 12 more than a “reasonable expectation” that the petitioners will face such orders again. Three undisputed facts demonstrate that likelihood. … Carmack, 329 U.S. 230, 243 n.13 (1946); see also Pet.23-24. The Fourth Circuit’s approach departs from both of those norms.
Reply Brief — B. M., Petitioner v. United States, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 25, 2024
No. 24-386 In the Supreme Court of the United States B. M., Petitioner, v. United States, et al., Respondents. … App. 24. 9 continuing the prosecution violates their M.R.E. 513 protections.
Petition — Bradford v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
U.S., 399 F. … Randall, (DC Supr.Ct. 11/24/76), 20 Cr.L. 2299.
441 U.S. 931Opposition Brief — Unus v. Kane (No. 09-294)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2009
Commonwealth, 493 S.E.2d 397, 399 (Va. … Pet. 24.
Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Kiraly v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1971
United States, 399 F.2d 471, rehearing denied, 402 F.2d 271 (5th - Cir. 1968) Plies ts. United TASS 431 F.2d 727 (9th Cir. 1970). Portnoy ts. … denied, 366 U.S. 911. gyi 23. 399 F.2d at 472.. : { ope as "10 Tie ek, j of conflict regarding this issue. In United States vs.
404 U.S. 915Amicus Curiae Brief — John Doe, et al., Petitioners v. Kathy Hochul, Governor of New York, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 18, 2026
Northwell Health Sys., No. 24-2665, 2025 WL 2610704 (2d Cir. … General Mills Inc., 513 F.2d 1040 (6th Cir. 1975), Williams, 492 F.2d 399, and Rosenfeld v.
Response — Republican National Committee v. Federal Election Commission
Supreme Court brief · Response · 2003
Moss 399 Park Avenue ERIC J. MOGILNICKI New York, NY 10022 EDWARD C. DUMONT PAUL R.Q. WOLFSON WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING 2445 M Street, N.W. … Question Presented 6; see also id. at 22-24. That question presents no issue appropriate for this Court’s consideration.
539 U.S. 912Reply Brief — Libertarian Party of Virginia v. Davis
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1986
Supp. 399 (M.D.Ala. S9GC) cecavcasesedess 15 Libertarian Party of Oklahoma ve Oklahoma State Election Board, 593 F. Supp. 118 (W.D.OKla. … Supp. 399 (D.C. Ala. 1984); Libertarian Party of Texas v. Fainter, 741 F.2d 728 (Sth Cir. 1984); Liber- tarlian Party of South Dakota v. Kundert, 579 F.
475 U.S. 1013Reply Brief — Abbott v. Perez (Nos. 17-626, 17-586)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2017
University Committee to End the War in Viet Nam, 399 US. (1970), “has already squarely re- jected” the State’s jurisdictional argument. MALC Mot. 19. … See J.S. 24-25.
Reply Brief — Northern Arapaho Tribe, et al., Petitioners v. Wyoming, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 4, 2018
Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) .................................................. 3 Mattz v. Arnett, 412 U.S. 481 (1973) .................................................. 8 Nebraska v. Parker, 136 S. … See Pet.23-24.
Reply Brief — Marzani v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1948
S. 86, 91 (1940). 4 United States v Krulewich, 145 F. 24 76 C.C.A. 2 (1944) 9 United States v Nash, 229 U. … Secs. 398-399)... 9-10 Miscellaneous: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 35.0000.
335 U.S. 895Amicus Curiae Brief — Amy Hadley, Petitioner v. City of South Bend, Indiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 8, 2026
Hong Dep. 38:24–39:5; C.A. E.R. (Doc. 10.1) at 53:24–54:5. Sergeant Hong’s testimony is not idiosyncratic. … Gervasi Counsel of Record Cobb & Johns PLLC 13341 West US-290, Building 2 Austin, TX 78737 (512) 399-3150 alexa@cobbjohns.com Counsel for Amicus Curiae May 8, 2026
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 30, 2018
Super. 445, 453, 24 A.3d 802, 807 (App. … Super. 68, 74-75, 16 A.3d 399, 403 (App. Div. 2011))); Liberty Mut. Ins., 297 N.J.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Neil v. Phillips
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972
Code Annot. 24-112, Communi- cations between psychiatrist and patient, and the ad- verse decision of the Tennessee courts forecloses con- sideration of the issue. … Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1969), the Supreme Court, while refusing to set forth a theory "that would de- termine the validity of all such hearsay ‘exceptions’ " (399 U.S, at 162), provided guidance regarding
409 U.S. 884Amicus Curiae Brief — Deboer v. Snyder, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-571)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Long, A 24 Treatise on The Law of Domestic Relations, § 5 (St. Paul, Keefe-Davidson Co. 1905). … Id. at 399. Decisions, such as Sosna, Pennoyer, and Maynard v.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 23, 2025
McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 399 (4th Cir. 2015)]. 109 F.4th at 700 (emphases in original). … McRae, 793 F.3d at 399.
Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — American-West African Line, Inc. v. Lydecker
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1941
She was Frye’s sole surviving dependent (R., 7, 130, 131, 399). (During these years he made no allotments to anyone else.) … S. 24, 31; The Justices v. Murray, 9 Wall. 274; Erie R. R. v. Winter, 143 U. 8S. 60, 75; Herencia v. Guzman, 219 U. S. 44; Southern Railway v. Bennett, 233 U. S. 80. Judgment affirmed.’’
313 U.S. 596Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Clement A. Evans & Co. v. A. M. Kidder & Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1971
Van- derboom, 422 F. 2d 221 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 905, 90 S. … denied 399 U.S. 905, 90 S.
402 U.S. 988Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 29, 2019
Green, 399 U.S. at 156–57. … Green, 399 U.S. at 189 n.22 (Harlan, J., concurring).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.