Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pledger v. Medlock

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

, Sept. 4, 1990. 16 DBS systems permit individuals to receive satellite delivered television programming through a small receiving dish antenna for a subscription fee. 1% MMDS involves over-the-air … by the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. §§521, 543 (1988).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rick Siegel, Petitioner v. Jude Salazar

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 2, 2026

It is the same for artists—unemployment rate for actors, writers, directors and other artists approaches ninety percent, even during strong economic periods. … As this Court emphasized in Utility Air Regulatory Group v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Brian Tingley, Petitioner v. Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney General of Washington, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 26, 2023

. § 2000bb-2 ................................................. 10 Other Authorities Comment of the Religious Liberty Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan on Proposed Amendment of Rule 1.109 of the … Ct. at 2463 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, Petitioner v. David Martinez Ramirez

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 20, 2021

Clinton, Statement on Signing the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (Apr. 24, 1996) ..................... 12 141 Cong. Rec. … As cases like Harris show, state court judges can similarly be certain that those who gave up their right to a trial based upon unconstitutionally bad advice will have one clean shot to raise the issue

Amicus Curiae Brief — Relentless, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Department of Commerce, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 22, 2023

Continued deference is also particularly appropriate where the statutory authority at issue, like the Clean Air Act amendments in Chevron, is part of “a lengthy, detailed, technical, complex, and comprehensive … And, of course, the FDA must also provide the public with notice and an opportunity to comment on proposed regulations, 5 U.S.C. § 553, and must consider and “respond to significant comments.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Los Angeles County, California, et al., Petitioners v. Peter Woods Nyarecha, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2025

The Opinion allows courts to make dangerous 5 generalizations about the existence of a widespread custom or policy when the evidence shows the actions of only a few employees in a short time period. … During his five weeks of confinement at the jail, he had daily difficulties accessing his bed, showering, using the restroom and getting clean afterwards due to his bowel incontinence and paralysis from

Amicus Curiae Brief — James Harper, Petitioner v. Michael Faulkender, Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 28, 2025

Forward Air, Inc., 609 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2010) ......................................................... 12 Olmstead v. … Wisconsin, 520 U.S. 385, 392 n.4 (1997) (cleaned up). Lower courts have not always evaluated Fourth Amendment challenges with that history in mind. A.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Palazzolo v. Rhode Island

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

L.J. 73 (1988) .......... 3 John Delaney and Duane Desiderio, Who Will Clean Up the Ripeness Mess? … During that same time period, property owners who could afford to continue litigation before one of the U.S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bragdon v. Abbott

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

McNeil, Plagues and People (1976). 6 Ibid. 7 See Erving Goffman, Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (1963), for comment about why those singled out are invariably those already possessed … So I resolved always to speak - and to act — quite clearly, as this was the only way of setting myself on the right track.!

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Small Business United, dba National Small Business Association, et al., Petitioners v. Scott Bessent, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026

A corporate entity’s “arrangements,” “understandings,” “relationships,” and other “direct” and “indirect” decisionmaking mechanisms for running the organization, 31 U.S.C. § 5336(a)(3)(A), are not aired … Patel, 576 U.S. at 419-20 (cleaned up). “This rule applies to commercial premises as well as to homes.” Id. (quotation omitted).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

All Title VII Claims Are Subject To The Act's Express Charge-Filing Limitations Period ... A. … United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans, 431 U.S. 553 (1977). Evans was employed as a flight attendant at United Air Lines.

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1931

Cleaning: eee ginning cotton does not make the resulting: — cotton a manufyctate of cottori.’ & aS ? . … f'n mlew vase attempted: te eupport its definition of the - word ‘manufactare” hy queting from *ix cases, none - of which involved pate nis, and two of which were cases : eased open the tariff act ie

Amicus Curiae Brief — Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Fischer and Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Kurz

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

-United Air Lines, Inc., 756 F.2d 1274 (7th Cir. 1985). … United Air Lines, Inc., 756 F.2d 1262. 1268 (7th Cir. 1985).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bay Area Laundry and Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of Cal.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

. ————————————— os IN THE ‘Supreme Court of the United States OCTOBER TERM, 1996 BOARD OF TRUSTEES, BAY AREA LAUNDRY AND Dry CLEANING PENSION TRUST FUND, w. … The “act or omission” by which a multiemployer plan is harmed for purposes of applying the 6-year limitations period to collections is not the “act of withdrawal,” as an employer can meet the statutory

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of State, et al., Applicants v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 11, 2025

Campaign Clean Water, Inc., 420 U.S. 136 (1975) oo... cee eeeeseeereereeneersees 1 Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. … Under the latter provision “an adjournment of more than 3 days to a day certain shall be excluded in the computation of the 45-day period.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

.¢.Cir. 1980), cert enied, 453 U.S. 913 (1981) ...... .. . passim Western Air Lines v. … Similarly, the Occupational Safety and Health Act ("OSH Act"), 29 U.S.C. §651, et 3/ In Lochner v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Morgan, 536 U.S. 101 (2002) and United Air Lines, Inc. v. … Prior to Morgan, this Court held in United Air Lines, Inc. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Turner v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 614 (2016) (No. 15-1503)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

at another cleaning company in Rockville from August 1990 to November 1992. … App. 13. 10 same time period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Knick v. Twp. of Scott, 139 S. Ct. 50 (2018) (No. 17-647)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Desiderio, Who Will Clean Up the “Ripeness Mess”? … Far from it, the “debates over the 1871 Act are re- plete with hostile comments directed at state judicial systems.” Id. at 363-364.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Warner Chappell Music, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sherman Nealy, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 4, 2023

Copyright Act’s three-year limitation period. … period.