Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.09s
Reply Brief — William C. McGee, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 12, 2020
Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2020) ................................... 1, 2, 6 United States v. Stitt, 139 S. … See Gary Pet. pg. 24 (arguing that the holding of Gary is “likely” to impact jury trials).
Reply Brief — Blanton v. North Las Vegas
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1989
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) was relied upon as authority, which case preserved the “nature of the offense” test. Baldwin, 399 U.S. at 69, n.6. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 74 n.22 (1970).
489 U.S. 538Petition for Writ of Certiorari — BBF Liquidating, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972
Code of Civil Procedure, § § 22; 24 ceemeemiaee 22 -_ (al. Corp. Code, § 5012 en : me Bek cheat 13 Cal, Corp. Code, § 5400 nejcceneen-n6, 12,14, 15, 16, 17, 24 _ Cal. Corp. … In view of the fact that Section 399 and Section 5400 were both enacty(!
405 U.S. 1065Administrative Rulemaking, Guidance, and Enforcement Procedures
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 2, 2021
PART 399—STATEMENTS OF GENERAL POLICY 3. The authority citation for part 399 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 41712, 40113(a). 4. … Signed in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2021. Peter Paul Montgomery Buttigieg, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2021-06416 Filed 4-1-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
86 FR 17292Transportation DepartmentOffice of the SecretaryPetition — Patrick Simpson v. State of Georgia
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970). » « Wood, et al vs. … Illinois, 399 U. S. 235 (90 SC 2018, 26 LE2d 586); Morris v. Schoonfield, 399 U. S. 508 (90 SC 2232, 26 LE2d 773); and Tate v. Short, 401 U.
450 U.S. 972Reply Brief — Pablo Santana Arellano, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 9, 2024
Brown, 399 S.E.2d 593, 594 (S.C. 1991). See United States v. Arellano, No. 23-10199, 2024 WL 1156535, at *1 (5th Cir. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994), Andersen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463 (1976), Lakeside v. Oregon, 435 U.S. 333 (1978), and Baldwin v.
Prologue — Bridgestone Corp. v. City of Monroe (Nos. 05-170, 05-168)
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005
Litig.,— | 300 F. 3d 881 (8th Cir. 2002)..............0.... 24 In re Silicon Graphics Inc. Sec. Litig., 183 F. 3d 970 (9th Cir. 1999).............. 19, 24 Kushner v. … OPINIONS BELOW The opinion of the Sixth Circuit dated February 4, 2005 is reported at 399 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2005), and appears as Appendix A to this Petition.
Petitioners Brief — Blanton v. North Las Vegas
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1989
New York, 399 U.S. 66, 70, 90 S.Ct. 1886, 1889, 26 L.Ed.2d 437 (1970) allows trial by jury in DWI. … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970).
489 U.S. 538Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002
Minn. 1975). 1] Hospital and Service Employees Local 399, 293 NLRB 601 (1989), on remand from Hospital and Service Employees Local 399 v. … (CR 24-25, 47-49; Pet. App. 5a).
535 U.S. 928Federal Register · Rule · Oct 22, 2021
Coast Guard District 11, Sector San Francisco, at 415-399-3585, SFWaterways@uscg.mil . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. … (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by VHF Channel 69 or phone at 1-415-399-3547.
86 FR 58573Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardSupreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 22, 2025
City ofEl Monte, 138 F.3d 393, 399 (9th Cir. 1998)). … In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 3 1 F.3d 1217, 1228 (9th Cir. 2006) (citing Hernandez, 138 F.3d at 399).
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 24, 2022
Town of Gilbert, 576 U.S. 155 (2015,) 24 Rosenbergerv. Rector & Visitors ofUniv. ofVa. 515 U.S. 819 (1995) ..24 Sessionv. Dimaya, 138 S. Ct. 1204 at 1212 19 Tenn. Student Assistant Corp. v. … Pennsylvania 382 U.S. 399, 402 15 L. Ed. 2d 447, 86 S.
Petition — Mitchell v. Georgia
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
State, 154 Ga.App. 399, —— S.E.2d (1980) and appears in the Appendix hereto. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966).
449 U.S. 1011Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — United States v. Brewster
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1972
United States, 355 F. 2d 167 (5th Cir. 1965) —-,,24 Powell. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486,(1969) . .7, 17-19, 21 _. Sorrells v. … Sisson: 399 U.S. 267, 301 — (1970).
408 U.S. 501Agency decision · Agency decision
Proc. 2013-34, sec. 4, 2013-43 I.R.B. 397, 399-403. See generally Reilly-Casey v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-292. … Proc. 2013-34, sec. 4.01(7), 2013-43 I.R.B. at 399-400.
United States Tax CourtPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Booth v. Arkansas
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
State, 271 Ark. 150, 607 S.W.2d 399 (1980) Cardwell v. Lewis, 417 U.S. 583, 94 S.Ct. 2464 (1974) Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975 (1970) Freeman v. … Jurisdiction The judgment of the Circuit Court of Benton County was filed on February 24, 1987.
490 U.S. 1047Petition for Writ of Certiorarimm — Polo Ralph Lauren Corp. v. Belekis
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorarimm · 2003
McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 407-08 (1997) (discussing Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526 (1985)). … McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997).
537 U.S. 1191Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Clarke, 479 U.S. at 399-400 (citing Invest- ment Co. Institute v. Camp, 401 U.S. 617 (1971)). … See Clarke, 479 U.S. at 399 (quoting Block, 467 U.S. at 347).
Reply Brief — United States v. First National Bancorporation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1972
Phillipsburg National Bank, 399 US. 350, 360-361. … Phillipsburg National Bank 399 | U.S. 350, 366-367.
405 U.S. 915Opposition Brief — Peterson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974
Jordon, 399 F. 2d 610..............:.00008 7 United States v. … Jordan, 399 F. 2d 610, 615 (2nd Cir., 1968).” (Pet. App. 89). 3.
419 U.S. 831
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.