Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

The court also commented that the allocation of interest expense is “very favorable” to the domiciliary corporation. Id. … If we were writing on a clean slate, these arguments might appear persuasive.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Illinois, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 10, 2025

They are instead legally barred from doing so for a period. … Army or the Air Force.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

The Beachfront Management Act is different from such traditional environmental laws as prevention of pollution, 33 U.S.C.A. § 1251, et seq. (1986) (Clean Water Act), or protection of endangered species … This was not because [his] property vanished into thin air. It was because the Government for its own advantage destroyed the value of the [property] . . Id. at 48.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Dep't of Commerce v. New York, 139 S. Ct. 1249 (2019) (No. 18-966)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

gasses because it gave only broad political and policy grounds, emanating from the President, for its refusal to regulate, and ignored statutory factors: If EPA makes a finding of endangerment, the Clean … Air Act requires the Agency to regulate 13 emissions of the deleterious pollutant from new motor vehicles. .. .

Amicus Curiae Brief — Daniel Grand, Petitioner v. City of University Heights, Ohio, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 8, 2026

Anthony List, 573 U.S. at 162 (cleaned up and emphasis added). … See United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, comment on Health and Human Services Grants Regulation at 6–7 (September 5, 2023).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971

Lawler, and first resummarized the essential facts as follows (A. 56-57): “Isbell was associated with the Antenna Labo- ratory of the University of Illinois in performance of an Air Force contract. … Copies were mailed out of Miss Johnson’s office, pursuant to the Air Force contract, to persons on the distribution list May 5.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Air Force { 17. … Air Force J 32; Decl. of U.S. Navy 4.

Amicus Curiae Brief — ABF Freight System, Inc. v. NLRB

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

original discharge indisputably would not have occurred absent an illegal motive, and the dis- charged employee was therefore definitely out of the workplace, and suffering economic losses, for a period … from Trans- portation Management in several critical respects, all of which support the “unfitness” prong of the Board's test: First, the discriminatee has been absent from the workplace for some period

Amicus Curiae Brief — Infineon Technologies AG v. Rambus, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

issued by the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”). … When a court acts outside the rules that ordinarily govern the system, that trust and respect are at risk.

Amicus Curiae Brief — RADesign, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Michael Grecco Productions, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 14, 2025

Zimmerman, 330 F.2d 740 (CA5 1964) ................................ 17 Bay Area Laundry and Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. … period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Franconia Associates v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

See Riverside Bayview, 474 U.S. 121 (permitting scheme to fill wetlands under Clean Water Act Section 404); Hodel, 452 U.S. 264 (permitting scheme under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act … Water Act: Good v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gary Perez, et al., Petitioners v. City of San Antonio, Texas

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 31, 2026

Id. at 678–679 (cleaned up). The plaintiff failed to “identify any ‘exercise’ which is the subject of the burden to which he objects.” Id. at 679. … Allen, 502 F.3d 1255, 1277 (11th Cir. 2007) (cleaned up), abrogated on other grounds by Sossamon v. Texas, 563 U.S. 277 (2011).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 10, 2025

L. & POL. 715, 719 (2023) (cleaned up). … Sept. 6, 2024) (cleaned up). The Fourth Circuit lost sight of those basic principles here. II.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

compelled to take once she submits an ap- plication to the Patent Office is that the industry may not be mature enough to appreciate the commercial aspects of the invention during the patent’s enforceable period … Linde Air Prods. Co., 339 U.S. 605, 607 (1950) (the disclosure of inventions, “is one of the primary purposes of the patent system”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

built up over long periods of time. … For similar reasons, the statute of limitations under both the Railway Labor Act and the National Labor Relations Act is a relatively short period — six months. 29 U.S.C. § 160(b); De/Costello v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jatonya Clayborn Muldrow, Petitioner v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 1, 2023

In their view, “the acts [she] complains of ultimately had no effect on her employment status” and were thus “too insubstantial to be considered an adverse employment action.” Id. at 617-18. … Some discrimination in physical working conditions, however, hearkens back to the ugliest period of American history. Let’s return to Mr.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Marek v. Chesny

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

particularly encouraged protection of the civil rights of all Americans,” fee awards have also been provided by Congress in litigation involving other areas of public concern, such as the environment (Clean … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d)); consumer affairs (Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1640(a)); and labor matters (Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b)).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Janus v. Am. Fed'n, 138 S. Ct. 54 (2017) (No. 16-1466)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

An auditor would not 3 issue a “clean” or unmodified opinion in this situa- tion.? … The peer reviewer analyzes the audit firm’s accounting and auditing process, and it may select for review any Hudson audit conducted in the time period subject to review.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Warner Chappell Music, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sherman Nealy, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 4, 2023

and Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. … period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

Each had a “life long goal to fly for a major air carrier.” Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 130 F.3d 893, 895 (10th Cir. 1998). … However, as this Court has previously held, “Legislative observa- tions 10 years after passage of the Act are in no sense part of legislative history.” United Air Lines, Inc. v.