Documents

Petitioners Brief — Cupp v. Murphy

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1973

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 49 (1970); Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 158-159 -_ 15 wt (1925). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51-52 (1970).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Billy Raymond Counterman, Petitioner v. Colorado

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 12, 2022

E.g., R.A.V., 505 U.S. at 399 (internal quotation marks omitted); accord United States v. … R.A.V., 505 U.S. at 399 (quoting Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568, 571–72 (1942)); see also Riley v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ashley Moore, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 8, 2026

Moore, No. 7:24-cr-218-2 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2025) No other proceedings in state or federal trial or appellate courts, or in this Court, are directly related to this case. … Illinois directly condemns the approach taken below. 399 U.S. 235 (1970).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lutwak v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1953

(Emphasis added. 2 (R. 399.) … (C. 3d,°1944), 146 Fed: 24 837,-ynd Toshiko Inaba v. Nagle (C1 A — 8th, 1929) 36 Fed. 2d 48f.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Larry Lowery, Jr., Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 7, 2022

THIS ISSUE IS IMPORTANT AND RECURS FREQUENTLY........ccccce 24 IV. … Ct. 399 (2018), Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2248 (2016), and Taylorv.

Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation-Notice of Closed and Open Meetings for 2015

Federal Register · Notice · Feb 18, 2015

• August 31, not later than August 24, 2015. Requests for reasonable accommodation should be made by August 17, 2015. • December 7, not later than November 30, 2015. … Personal data is requested pursuant to Public Law 99-399 (Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986), as amended; Public Law 107-56 (USA PATRIOT Act); and Executive Order 13356.

Call for Nominations for the Steens Mountain Advisory Council, OR

Federal Register · Notice · Jan 28, 2013

The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours. … L. 106-399).

Memorandum — McCandless v. Furlaud

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1934

Dye, 70 Fed. 24 (C. C. A. 8th 1895), the Court said (p. 26): “Parties on appeal must abide by the theories adopted by them in the trial court. … Crawford, 3 Wall. 399, 34; McNitt v. Turner, 16 Wall. 352,/21 L. Ed. 341; Simmons v. Saul, 138 U. S. 439, 34 L. Ed. 1054; Shields v. Coleman, 157 U. S. 168, 39 L. Ed. 660. 18 L. Ed.

Memorandum — Sean Justin Owens, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · Nov 13, 2020

United States, No. 20-5558 (filed Aug. 24, 2020); Nickens v. United States, No. 20-5645 (filed Sept. 4, 2020); Heard v. … Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (2020), the case on which petitioner bases his claim of a circuit conflict as to the first question presented. See Pet. 8-10; Order, Medley, supra (No. 18-4789) (Nov. 12, 2020).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School Dist.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

Dist., 113 F.3d 1412 (5th - BS ft Nr re ore rt Te ere 18, 24 Doe v. Lago Vista Indep. Sch. Dist., 106 F.3d 1223 BR GD SRP cos castle vsesveccisatpavevedcasenes 24 Doe v. Petaluma City Sch. … Supp. 947, 955 (W.D.Tex. 1995), rev'd, 101 F.3d 393, 399 (5th Cir. 1996).

Appellants Brief — Morris v. Duby

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1927

Ohio, 3 How. 720, 11 L. ed. 800 24 Neilsen v. Oregon, 212 U. S. 315, 319.43 L. ed. 528, 529 32 Pensacola Tel. Co. v. W. U. Tel. Co., 967. S. 1, 24 L. ed. 708 25 Rsilroad Commission cases, 116 U. … Michigan, 190 U. 8. 377, 399, 400, 401; 47 L.. ed. 1103, 1110, 1111.

U.S. Tobacco Production, Consumption, and Export Trends

Congressional research report · CRS Report · Jun 3, 2003

Exports of tobacco leaf peaked in 1978 at 765 million pounds (farm weight), and then declined to an estimated 399 million pounds in 2002. … In 2002, by contrast, the U.S. share was 14% (Figure 24).

Opposition Brief — O'Grady v. Oberhand

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990

Doilinger, 95 N.J. 399 (1984). … Oberhand’s letter (197197: 6-13; 20T63: 11-17; 20T149: 14-24).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Roxanne Torres, Petitioner v. Janice Madrid, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 6, 2020

Benner, 24 F. Cas. 1084, 1086-87 (C.C.E.D. … Rev. 396, 399 (1987); see Utah v. Strieff, 136 S. Ct. 2056, 2060-61 (2016).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Edwards v. Department of Energy (No. 06-1056)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

Tennessee, 399 F.3d 792, 794 (6th Cir. 2005) (quoting Hughes v. … Tennessee, 399 F.3d 792, 2005 WL 350946 (6th Cir.2005).

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NYSE Amex LLC Amending NYSE Amex Equities Rule 124 To Clarify the Pricing Methodology for the Odd-Lot Portion of a Part of a Round-Lot Order; Clarify the Systems Capable of Accepting PRL Orders; and Clarify the Systems Capable of Accepting a Good ‘Til Cancelled Order During the Implementation of Exchange System Enhancements

Federal Register · Notice · Jun 25, 2009

Example: A marketable order to sell 399 shares of security XYZ is received by Exchange systems at 12:00:00. … E9-14957 Filed 6-24-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Patch v. Solar Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1945

S. 399 10 Critcher v. Linker, 169 Fed. 653 (C. C., W. D., Wis., 1909) ..-ccssvesssessneeneesneenes 9 Denecke v. Henry F. Miller & Son, 142 Iowa 486, lly N. W. 380 (1909)...... 9 Erdreich v. … S. 399, and Ohio Citizens Trust Co. v. Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. (D. C., Ohio), 56 F.

Petition for Rehearing — Johnston v. McIntee

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1950

Hall, 75 F. 2d 399, where the transferee became sole party plaintiff. … Both ‘‘Plaintiff’s Amended and Supplemented Complaint, as Further Amended and Supplemented’’ (Tr. 24-5) and plaintiff’s affidavit in support of his motion to be substituted (Tr. 17-24) state flatly

Reply Brief — M2 Software, Inc. v. Viacom, Inc. (No. 07-202)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007

Renosky, 399 F.3d FO Es ITED wecniecienntivecicovbistinrtternrcssvensevceoes 9 Blau v. YMI Jeanswear, Inc., No. CV 02- 09551 FMC (SHSx), 2004 WL 5313967 CET EF. … See Pet. 5 n.2, 24-25.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Lefors v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1955

Crim. 399, 208 S.W. 2d 643 (1948) _... 7 Hooker v. Los Angeles, 188 U.S. 314 (1903)... 14 Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 535 (1884) 13 Leeper v. … Crim. 399, 208 S.W. 2d 643 (1948).