Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.26s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Leachco, Inc., Petitioner v. Consumer Product Safety Commission, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 12, 2024
POL’Y 729, 742 n.65 (2015) (cleaned up). Montesquieu was a third voice in the chorus. … Arthrex, Inc., 594 U.S. 1, 11 (2021) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Billy Raymond Counterman, Petitioner v. Colorado
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 6, 2023
Ct. at 1891 (cleaned up). … (cleaned up)).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 2, 2022
Ct. 2484, 2498 (2019) (cleaned up). … Johnson, 515 U.S. 900, 911 (1995) (cleaned up); see Plessy v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 22, 2019
Clean Air Eng’g Inc., 267 F.3d 660 (7th Cir. 2001) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Chevron Inc. v. … Clean Air Eng’g Inc., 267 F.3d 660, 673-74 (7th Cir. 2001); Kappos v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gobeille v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 135 S. Ct. 885 (2014) (No. 14-181)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Delta Air Lines, ee ee itsitinsevisiniiitennnesnninens Sprietsma v. … Affordable Care Act Implementation (Part XXVIII) (Aug. 11, 2015), http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq- EE RC 23 HHS, Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 27, 2026
Rev. 2085 (2020) .................... 24 Comment, 7 Yale L. … Moody, 603 U.S. at 757 (Thomas, J., concurring) (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 19, 2024
SAVE cited amendments made to the Higher Education Act by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Pub. … Trucking Ass’ns, 531 U.S. 457, 472 (2001) (cleaned up). Accordingly, “Congress … may not transfer to another branch ‘powers which are strictly and exclusively legislative.’” Gundy v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 3, 2021
Release No. 9106, Exchange Act Release No. 61,469, 72 Fed. … To the contrary, it maintained the company’s stock at a higher price than it could have borne if the company had come clean. Glickenhaus & Co. v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2025
The California Air Resources Board’s declarant below likewise recognized that without the standards, “it is reasonable to expect that there would be … additional gasoline-fueled vehicles produced and sold … Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act. 520 U.S. at 158-59.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rodriguez v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Air Force Air Force Legal Services Agency Counsel of Record JAMES R. WISE TIMOTHY W. MURPHY Counsel for Amicus Curiae Counsel for Amicus Curiae Colonel, U.S. Air Force Lt Colonel, U.S. … In the Air Force, the new procedures required a two-day waiting period between the order and the evaluation, except in emergency situations.
531 U.S. 1151Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 30, 2023
FCC, 2 F.4th 421, 436 (5th Cir. 2021) (cleaned up). … Cir. 2004) (cleaned up). 21 (statement of Alito, J., respecting denial of certiorari) (cleaned up); see Ass’n of Am. R.Rs. v. U.S. Dep’t of Transp., 721 F.3d 666, 670 (D.C.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board v. Department of Transportation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Plan envisions no change in the airport operational role over the 20 year period of the Master Plan. … required by § 504(a) of the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982.
530 U.S. 1284Amicus Curiae Brief — Hernandez v. Mesa, 136 S. Ct. 567 (2015) (No. 15-118)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Comm., General Comment No. 31, Nature of the General Legal Obligation Im- posed on States Parties to the Covenant, U.N. Doc. … (Sept. 29, 1999).16 The Alejandre case arose out of the well-known 1996 “Brothers to the Rescue” incident, in which the Cu- ban Air Force shot down two unarmed civilian air- 16 Similarly, the International
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alexander Balbuena, Petitioner v. Brian Cates, Acting Warden
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2021
Brian Cates, Acting Warden, Respondent. … Ct. at 1706 (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 5, 2020
Ct. 1807 (2016) (judicial review of agency interpretation of Clean Water Act); Sackett v. EPA, 566 U.S. 120 (2012) (same); Rapanos v. … Marshall, 564 U.S. 462, 484 (2011) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Ali Danial Hemani
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 30, 2026
Bruen, 597 U.S. at 36 (cleaned up) (emphasis in original). … The impressment of arms from Quakers by some States during this period was justified on similar grounds. 3 4 See, e.g., Act of Mar. 14, 1776, ch. 21, §§ 1–5, in 5 THE ACTS AND RESOLVES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
Amicus Curiae Brief — Arizona, et al., Petitioners v. Navajo Nation, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 8, 2023
ANDERSON ET AL., AMERICAN INDIAN LAW: CASES AND COMMENTS (4th ed. 2020)................5 SANDRA B. … During periods of scarcity, “priority among confirmed rights is determined according to the date of initial diversion.” Id.
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States Shoe Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. is a Delaware corporation. … (citing Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 299, 306 (1923)).
538 U.S. 1056Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Dep’t of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, 51 FLRA 1532, 1536 (1996). … Army and Air Force Exchange Service, 5 FLRC 167 (1977).
524 U.S. 903Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
For almost a decade, the Army Corps of Engineers had maintained that it was prohibited by the Clean Water Act from regulating “de minimis incidental soil movement.” … Ultimately, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled the Corps had exceeded its authority under the Clean Water Act and invalidated the revised rule.
532 U.S. 598
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.