Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.42s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Van Rijk v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Similarly, with respect to prospective alterations, the Boat Safety Act grants manufacturers a generous grace period to bring their production in line with new federal requirements. … Even with prospective changes in safety or equipment standards, the Act requires the Coast Guard to allow a six-month grace period before new regula- tions become effective, “unless * * * there exists
534 U.S. 955Amicus Curiae Brief — Charles Flynn, Petitioner v. Department of State
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 26, 2024
The majority contradicted the statute’s plain meaning by concluding “that ‘any period’ encompasses more than just the time period in which a veteran receives active service pay.” Id. at 1372. C. … Relying on an Air Force radiation dose-estimate methodology, VA again denied his claim. Id. While Mr.
Amicus Curiae Brief — China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, 138 S. Ct. 1800 (2018) (No. 17-432)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
And as reflected in Justice Blackmun’s comment, it not only protects those who were aware of their claims and chose to bet on class certification, but those who were ignorant through lack of diligence … See, e.g., Transfer Order, In re Volkswagen “Clean Diesel” Mktg. Sales Practices & Prod. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 2672, (J.P.M.L. Dec. 8, 2015), ECF No. 950.
Amicus Curiae Brief — China Agritech, Inc., Petitioner v. Michael H. Resh, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 26, 2018
And as reflected in Justice Blackmun’s comment, it not only protects those who were aware of their claims and chose to bet on class certification, but those who were ignorant through lack of diligence … See, e.g., Transfer Order, In re Volkswagen “Clean Diesel” Mktg. Sales Practices & Prod. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 2672, (J.P.M.L. Dec. 8, 2015), ECF No. 950.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Lee v. International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
The lack of choice for waiting air passengers 1s more apparent and- more compelling, particularly air travellers in peak travel periods or during inclement weather, whose confinement is more prolonged … The act of solicitation requires the solicitor to intercept potential donors "as they move about, and if success is achieved, stopping them momentarily or for longer periods as money is given or exchanged
505 U.S. 830Amicus Curiae Brief — Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
When the Cable Act was passed in 1992, 40 percent of Americans still depended on over-the-air broadcasts, and the Court reasoned that must carry was necessary “to preserve access to free television … See Data Sought on Uses of Spectrum, Public Notice, 24 FCC Red 14275, 14277 "4B.5, D (Dec. 21, 2009) (requesting comments on “the costs to replace over-the-air delivery to MVPDs and consumers with
560 U.S. 918Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 22, 2019
Waldburger, 573 U.S. 1 (2014) (involving preemption with respect to the interplay between state limitations periods and federal environmental law); Mutual Pharm. Co. v. … her a warning concerning possible risk of developing deep-vein thrombosis during air travel.
Amicus Curiae Brief — C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Clarkstown
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Flow control, of course, does not violate the Sherman Act. Central lowa Refuse Systems, Inc. v. … Indianapolis, 902 F.2d 521 (7th Cir. 1990) (city may concentrate its garbage al a single site given concem about clean-up costs at another site).
511 U.S. 383Amicus Curiae Brief — Nike, Inc. v. Kasky
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
AIR, AND THE NEW NATIONAL ACTIVISM ft 7 ROBERT GOLDMAN & STEPHEN PAPSON, NIKE CUL- TURE: THE SIGN OF THE SWOOSH 19 (1998) S. … RANDY SHAW, RECLAIMING AMERICA: NIKE, CLEAN AIR, AND THE NEW NATIONAL ACTIVISM 17 (1999); see MARCONI, supra, at p. 58 (“Running shoes as a symbol of rebellion and individuality?
539 U.S. 654Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 21, 2023
Ct. 2587 (2022) (EPA found to have exceeded its statutory authority under the Clean Air Act); see also, e.g., Sackett v. EPA, 143 S. … Ct. 1322 (2023) (EPA found to have exceeded its statutory authority under the Clean Water Act).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Miller v. French
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
The Automatic Stay Provision of the Prison Liti- gation Reform Act, §3626(e)(2), Is Unconstitu- a ss oc eceeecs 16 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Cases C. & S. Air Lines v. … Air Lines v.
530 U.S. 327Amicus Curiae Brief — Teleprompter Corp. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
or in a revision of that Act. … We have acted now, in light of the present copyright sit- uation, which would appear likely to obtain for some substantial period of time, and without the slightest intent of affecting the determinations
415 U.S. 394Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 20, 2023
Circuit courts interpreting the Clean Water Act have long recognized that “the most common way by which pollutants reach the surface waters is through improper ‘land application’” because “when waste is … Defecation, urination, drug deals, assaults, sexual acts, and rape also occur in the open air with increasing impunity.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners v. Michael Cargill
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 26, 2024
to have come from the National Firearms Act. … Even if arguments can be made for Chevron in routine administrative matters (such as 18 the meaning of “stationary source” in the Clean Air Act), or in civil cases, it is overreach to permit agencies
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 3, 2021
Release No. 9106, Exchange Act Release No. 61,469, 72 Fed. … To the contrary, it maintained the company’s stock at a higher price than it could have borne if the company had come clean. Glickenhaus & Co. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph W. Fischer, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 5, 2024
Koray, 515 U.S. 50, 56 (1995) (cleaned up). … Yates, 574 U.S. at 544 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
In fact, the authors of the Federalist Papers pleaded with the states to take action during that period. … Code § 17911.5 (West 1998) (clean fuel school buses) ; Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 4a-59 (West 1998) (clean alterna- tive fuel); Ind.
530 U.S. 363Amicus Curiae Brief — Bender v. Williamsport Area School Dist.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
The debate on the Equal Access Act in both the House and the Senate attempted to define the third element so as to exclude Williamsport's activities period from the Act's coverage. … I have heard the term ‘school day’ thrown around in senatorial comment today but that is not what this bill says."
475 U.S. 534Amicus Curiae Brief — Newdunn Associates, LLP v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Be Se cccdiiadenasiaihlateissetnnietinicinen 3,8 STATUTES AND REGULATIONS Clean Water Act Section 404, 33 U.S.C § 1344.... passim SS U.BL.. § ERT vicectnncetcssncsinpmctncnsimismieiiceonis 5 39 CP … This is co-extensive with the definition found in the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). See Rice v. Harken Exploration Co., 250 F.3d 264, 267 (Sth Cir. 2001) (citing 33 U.S.C. § 1362(7) (2000)).
541 U.S. 972Amicus Curiae Brief — Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 657 (2018) (No. 18-15)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seg., and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seqg., to name but a few. … Auer deference encourages federal agencies to draft ambiguous rules during the notice-and-comment period, while at the same time discouraging them from informal avenues, that an agency otherwise would
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.