Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.04s
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 22, 2025
Macomber, No. 24-2122 (9th circuit improperly time-bars Motion for Reconsideration. APPENDIX B; Carr v. Macomber, No. 24-2122 (9th Circuit denies issuance of Certificate of. Appealability. … Wainwright, 477 U.S.399 (1986) Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930 (2007) , Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131, 138 (1988) Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275 (1993) Andrew v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Carlos Pena, Petitioner v. City of Los Angeles, California
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 11, 2026
Hong Dep. 38:24–39:5; C.A. E.R. (Doc. 10.1) at 53:24–54:5). Sergeant Hong’s testimony is not idiosyncratic. … Gervasi Counsel of Record Cobb & Johns PLLC 13341 West US-290, Building 2 Austin, TX 78737 (512) 399-3150 alexa@cobbjohns.com Counsel for Amicus Curiae May 11, 2026
Opposition Brief — Brigandi v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973
Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1969) 0.00. 16 Zap v. … Harris, 453 F. 24 1317 (8th Cir. 1972).
414 U.S. 1040Opposition — Penoli v. California
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
Maroney (1970) 399 U.S. 42; Cardwell v. Lewis (1975) 417 U.S. 583, 589.) … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). See also South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 3604, 367 (1976).
440 U.S. 945Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Pordum v. Board of Regents of New York
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974
Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) .. 7,8 Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972) ...... 7 Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) ........ 6, 7 Brown v. … Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) (discharge of a teacher for ‘‘incompetency’’); Indiana ex rel. Anderson v.
419 U.S. 843Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mondakota Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1956
A petition for review was filed by petitioner in the court below on June 24, 1955 (R. 2-11). … Meth 3 Craneh 399, 413; see also Padlerton-Krucger Lumber Co. Vv. Northern) Pacific Railway Co, 266 U.S. 485: Scehirab vy.
352 U.S. 846Reply Brief — United States, Petitioner v. California, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 2, 2020
See Pet. 24-28. … California suggests (Br. in Opp. 24) that the Second Circuit’s decision in that case does not survive Murphy.
Reply Brief — Arthur Seale, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 23, 2025
Nos. 24-594 & 23-7806 IN THE ARTHUR SEALE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. … Dkt.” refer to docket No. 24-594, containing Dr. Seale’s petition from the amended judgment in his criminal case. Citations to “Civ.
Reply Brief — Ronell Moses, Jr., Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 23, 2025
No. 25-399 In the Supreme Court of the United States RONELL MOSES, JR., PETITIONER v. … Br. at 24 n.8, Jardines, supra (No. 11-564). But the Court flatly rejected that contention.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) .......cce.cccccsessseneeee 4, 7,8, 19 Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964) 20.0.0... cccecceseeees 16 Vieth v. … Rev. at 865-867; Jackman Report 24-32. Elections in multimember districts pose a similar problem when a party does not field enough candidates to fill the available seats.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Silber v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1962
United States, 365 U.S. 399 .......... 9, 16 Wrightson v. … S. 399 (1961), and Braden v. United States, 365 U.
370 U.S. 717Brief for the United States — United States v. Nobles
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1975
Nixon, No. 73-1766, de- cided July 24, 1974, slip op. 24. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78.
422 U.S. 225Respondents Brief — Gerard A. Sheridan, Petitioner v. Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 28, 2018
Dist. of Cal., 806 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir. 1986) .............................. 24 Brat v. Personhuballah, 883 F.3d 475 (4th Cir. 2018) …………………. 26, 27 Charles v. … Carland, 217 U.S. 268 (1910) .............................................. 24 McWilliams v. Dunn, 137 S. Ct. 1790 (2017) .......................................... 24 Melendres v. Arpaio, 989 F.
Supplemental Brief for the United States — Franklin Life Insurance v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief for the United States · 1969
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT Docket No. 1621-64 Filed February 24, 1969. … United States, 399 F. 2d 757, certiorari applied for Nov. 27, 1968, promul- gated subsequent to the original opinion of this Court, we deemed it appropriate to reconsider the two issues mentioned above
393 U.S. 1118Opposition — Marzano v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
United States, 399 F. 2d 557, certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1057 .0...........ccccceeceeees 7 Bayless v. … Tr. 24-25).
429 U.S. 1038Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Peele v. Jones
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974
ALABAMA, 399 U. S. 1 (1970); PHILLIPS v. NORTH CAROLINA, 433 F. 2d 659 (4th Cir. 1970) ; STATE v. GASQUE, supra. … Ed. 2d 24 (1968) , only discrim- inations which are “invidious” do. MOREY v. DOWD, 354 US. 457, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1485 (1957).
417 U.S. 930Opposition Brief — Aleman v. Sugarman
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973
George, 399 U.S. 224 Oliver v. State of California, 364 F. 2d 311 Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270 Scarpetta v. Spence-Chapin Adoption, 28 N Y 2d 185 Stanley v. … Mother has been on 24 hour suicide watch since May 18, 1971.
410 U.S. 983Supplemental Brief — McKeown v. Delaware Bridge Authority
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 2002
"Using Microsimulation to Quantify the Impact of Electronic Toll Collection” /TE Journal Vol. 66 (July 1996): 21-24. Friedman, David and Waldfogel, Joel. … Appendix A-15 00 LSt 0s'9 1z7z .2Besaay payyGiayy 399} 3..
535 U.S. 1079Supplemental Brief — Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Petitioner v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · Apr 11, 2023
iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED.......................................... i RULES 24(B) AND 29.6 STATEMENT .................... ii I. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) ................................................ 9 Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v.
The Work Opportunity Tax Credit: A Fact Sheet
Congressional research report · CRS Report · Apr 2, 1998
If WOTC-hires (except summer youth) are retained for 120-399 hours, firms can claim an income tax credit of 25% of the first $6,000 earned by the employee during the first year of employment. … Almost 60% were for members of the AFDC/TANF eligible group, and another 21% were for members of the group comprised of 18-24 year olds in families receiving food stamp benefits.
96-356Congressional Research Service
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.