Documents

Opposition — Penoli v. California

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979

Maroney (1970) 399 U.S. 42; Cardwell v. Lewis (1975) 417 U.S. 583, 589.) … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). See also South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 3604, 367 (1976).

Opposition Brief — Brigandi v. New York

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973

Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1969) 0.00. 16 Zap v. … Harris, 453 F. 24 1317 (8th Cir. 1972).

Petitioners Brief — United States v. Mitchell

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1980

Testan, supra, 424 U.S. at 399, quoting United States v. … Testan, supra, 424 U.S. at 399-400.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1966

Ce. . 1952), certified question dismissed, 344 U.S. 4 (1952)“.... 24 CAB v.-Delta Air Lines, 367 US. 316 (196K) | oi. 6s 12, 17, 24, 25 Capitot Airways v. CAB, 292 ¥'.2d 755 (D.C. … Another provision of Part 399, § 399.33 _ (a), sets forth the ecmdatiindi, ‘ander which the Board allows off- , pak reduced fares.

Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Gibbons

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1981

See Jurisdictional Statement at 23-24. … "In his dissent, Justice Black complained of the majority's departure from Ecker. 399 U.S. at 499.

Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al., Appellants v. Shannon Perez, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · Nov 20, 2017

Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006).1 Racially polarized voting is significant in Nueces County but insignificant in Travis County. … “[W]illfully ignor[ing] those who pointed out deficiencies,” id. 45a n.46, including its own attorney, the legislature ratified Plan C235 on June 24, 2013. I.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mondakota Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1956

A petition for review was filed by petitioner in the court below on June 24, 1955 (R. 2-11). … Meth 3 Craneh 399, 413; see also Padlerton-Krucger Lumber Co. Vv. Northern) Pacific Railway Co, 266 U.S. 485: Scehirab vy.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Pordum v. Board of Regents of New York

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974

Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) .. 7,8 Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972) ...... 7 Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) ........ 6, 7 Brown v. … Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) (discharge of a teacher for ‘‘incompetency’’); Indiana ex rel. Anderson v.

Reply Brief — United States, Petitioner v. California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 2, 2020

See Pet. 24-28. … California suggests (Br. in Opp. 24) that the Second Circuit’s decision in that case does not survive Murphy.

Reply Brief — Arthur Seale, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 23, 2025

Nos. 24-594 & 23-7806 IN THE ARTHUR SEALE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. … Dkt.” refer to docket No. 24-594, containing Dr. Seale’s petition from the amended judgment in his criminal case. Citations to “Civ.

Reply Brief — Ronell Moses, Jr., Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 23, 2025

No. 25-399 In the Supreme Court of the United States RONELL MOSES, JR., PETITIONER v. … Br. at 24 n.8, Jardines, supra (No. 11-564). But the Court flatly rejected that contention.

Respondents Brief — Gerard A. Sheridan, Petitioner v. Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 28, 2018

Dist. of Cal., 806 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir. 1986) .............................. 24 Brat v. Personhuballah, 883 F.3d 475 (4th Cir. 2018) …………………. 26, 27 Charles v. … Carland, 217 U.S. 268 (1910) .............................................. 24 McWilliams v. Dunn, 137 S. Ct. 1790 (2017) .......................................... 24 Melendres v. Arpaio, 989 F.

Petitioners Brief — Muniz v. Hoffman

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1975

New York, 399 U.S. 166 (1970) ............ 5 £5 60ee $44 bbs aed se eee eee 9, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20 Banks y. Grain Trimmers Ass’n, 390 U.S. 459 (1968) ..... 24 Blankenship v. … Baldwin, 399 U.S. 66, 70.

Respondents Brief — Gulf Coast Racing, L.L.C., et al., Petitioners v. Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Nov 12, 2024

Sept. 24, 2024). … App. 38a & n.24.

Opposition — Avcollie v. Connecticut

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

Lynch, 79 N.J. 327, 399 A. 2d 629 (1979) ........ 8 INDEX IN THE Page Supreme Court of the Gnited States OS. v. Aisisot, S35 B.. 20. … J. 327, 399 A. 2d 629, 635-636 (1979); People v. Leach, 57 A.D. 2d 332, 394 N.Y.S. 2d 722 (N.Y. Supreme Court App. Div. 2nd.

Rules of Practice for Motor Carrier Proceedings; Violations of Commercial Regulations

Federal Register · Rule · Feb 16, 2000

It is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. Please follow the instructions online for more information and help. … A driver who violates parts 385 and 390-399 of this subchapter, except a recordkeeping violation, is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $2,500.

Petition — Vance v. New Jersey

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976

New York, 399 U.S. 66, 69-70 (1970). Clearly, New Jersey considers the drinking-driver to be a threat of first magnitude and has legislated ac- cordingly. … Ct. 593, 24 L.Ed.2d 514 (1970). Compare Muniz v. Hoffman, Director, Region 20, National Labor Relations Board, — U.S. —, 45 L.Ed.2d 319, 95 S. Ct. — (1975).

Reply Brief — Arthur Lee Burton, Petitioner v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 7, 2024

No. 24-5221 ARTHUR LEE BURTON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF TEXAS, RESPONDENT. … True, 399 F.3d 315 (4th Cir. 2005) .................................................................................... 9 Winston v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kaiser v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973

Jacangelo, 281 F. 24 574 (3rd Cir. 1960). 20 14, 17, 19, 24 22 22 oS, 20, 13, 24, and 17 14, 15 ll 22 15, 23, 24 22 21 INDE X Cases (Continued) United States v. … Rule 52(a) and (b), 18 U.S.C.A., p. 399, Federal Rules of Crimi- nal Procedure. Section 3481, Title 18, U.S.C.A., p. 488. U.S.C.A. Constitutional Amend- ment Five, p. 4.

The Work Opportunity Tax Credit: A Fact Sheet

Congressional research report · CRS Report · Apr 2, 1998

If WOTC-hires (except summer youth) are retained for 120-399 hours, firms can claim an income tax credit of 25% of the first $6,000 earned by the employee during the first year of employment. … Almost 60% were for members of the AFDC/TANF eligible group, and another 21% were for members of the group comprised of 18-24 year olds in families receiving food stamp benefits.