Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.23s
Supplemental Brief — South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1997
Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) (No. 92-6281) —..... 1,2 Brief for Respondents Yankton Sioux Tribe and Darrell E. Drapeau, South Dakota v. … App. at 20, 24. But see Yank- ton, 99 F.3d at 1460 n. 31, Pet. App. at 50.
520 U.S. 1263Opposition Brief — Whorton v. Bockting
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
Bockting appealed and the Nevada Supreme Court entered an Order Dismissing that Appeal on December 24, 1997. … Bockting, 399 F.3d at 1016.
549 U.S. 406Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Dec 28, 2017
Thaw, in representing America 24-7 in armed combat earned his citizenship rights. … Id. at 399. . .
Opposition Brief — Kottaram v. Bank Leumi, USA
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005
Park South, be Bieiy Seo) | | ee 8 iv Cited Authorities Page STATUTES The Condominium and Cooperative Conversion Protection and Abuse Relief Act, P.L. 96-399, 15 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq. ........ … (Petition for Writ of Certiorari (“Pet.”), at 24-41).
544 U.S. 1060Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jesse Dean Redfearn, Petitioner v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 11, 2023
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 165-66 (1970)). … State, 2018 OK CR 24, U 30, 424 P.3d 677, 686.
Agency decision · Agency decision
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 408 (2012); see also Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharms., Inc., No. 24-CV-10565-DJC, 2025 WL 928747, at *20 (D. Mass. … Amneal Pharms. of N.Y., LLC, No. 24-1936 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 6, 2024), ECF No. 62; see also Mem. of Law of Amicus Curiae the Federal Trade Commission in Opp’n to Defs.’
Federal Trade CommissionUNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2025)
Agency decision · Agency decision
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 408 (2012); see also Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharms., Inc., No. 24-CV-10565-DJC, 2025 WL 928747, at *20 (D. Mass. … Amneal Pharms. of N.Y., LLC, No. 24-1936 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 6, 2024), ECF No. 62; see also Mem. of Law of Amicus Curiae the Federal Trade Commission in Opp’n to Defs.’
Federal Trade CommissionTribal code · Tribal code
TW-AX-0009 awarded by the Office of Violence Against Women, U.S. 24 HOUR HOTLINE 918-399-3310 sexual assault, and stalking the tools to live a life Department of Justice. … AGENCY SERVICES A Safestar is a specially selected woman who COMMUNITY EDUCATION • 24-Hour Help Line is successfully trained and qualified to provide Ti-hirasa provides educational programs and
Joint Appendix — Lewis v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1996
New York, 399 U.S. 66, 68 (1970) (plurality opinion) (citing Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968)). … New York, 399 U.S. at 68; Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas, Nev., 489 U.S. at 542.
518 U.S. 322Opposition — King v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
Green, 399 U.S. 149.0... 5 Carbo v. United States, 314 F. 2d 718, cer- tiorari denied, 377 U.S. 953 ............. eee. 8, 9 Graver Mfg. Co. v. Linde Co., 336 U.S. 271 ....6 Lutwak v. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 165-166.
430 U.S. 966Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 13, 2024
United States, 567 U.S. 387, 399 (2012). Congress wants Title I information services to flourish under a light-touch regulatory regime. … See 47 U.S.C. § 153(24).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Fritzie v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1984
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 189, n.22 (1970). … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970).
469 U.S. 983Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Albert Enrique Narvaez, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 3, 2024
(R.399). There was an issue with the victim not appearing for trial. (R.399). Petitioner was present for the calendar call held on August 30, 2018. (R.399). … (R.399). He also heard the State assert that the case could not be proved without the victim. (R.399).
Opposition Brief — Brigandi v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973
Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1969) 0.00. 16 Zap v. … Harris, 453 F. 24 1317 (8th Cir. 1972).
414 U.S. 1040Opposition — Penoli v. California
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
Maroney (1970) 399 U.S. 42; Cardwell v. Lewis (1975) 417 U.S. 583, 589.) … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). See also South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 3604, 367 (1976).
440 U.S. 945Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Pordum v. Board of Regents of New York
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974
Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) .. 7,8 Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972) ...... 7 Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) ........ 6, 7 Brown v. … Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) (discharge of a teacher for ‘‘incompetency’’); Indiana ex rel. Anderson v.
419 U.S. 843Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mondakota Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1956
A petition for review was filed by petitioner in the court below on June 24, 1955 (R. 2-11). … Meth 3 Craneh 399, 413; see also Padlerton-Krucger Lumber Co. Vv. Northern) Pacific Railway Co, 266 U.S. 485: Scehirab vy.
352 U.S. 846Reply Brief — United States, Petitioner v. California, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 2, 2020
See Pet. 24-28. … California suggests (Br. in Opp. 24) that the Second Circuit’s decision in that case does not survive Murphy.
Reply Brief — Arthur Seale, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 23, 2025
Nos. 24-594 & 23-7806 IN THE ARTHUR SEALE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. … Dkt.” refer to docket No. 24-594, containing Dr. Seale’s petition from the amended judgment in his criminal case. Citations to “Civ.
Reply Brief — Ronell Moses, Jr., Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 23, 2025
No. 25-399 In the Supreme Court of the United States RONELL MOSES, JR., PETITIONER v. … Br. at 24 n.8, Jardines, supra (No. 11-564). But the Court flatly rejected that contention.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.