Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.21s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
Title I of that Act, the ‘* Airport and Air- way Development Act of 1970,’ authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to make grants of $840 million for public airport development over a four-year period … The Government’s brief, when compared with these comments on the 1972 Act and the Opinion of the Depart- ment of Transportation filed in the Massachusetts case in 1971, demonstrates that the Secretary
411 U.S. 624Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
Boulder, however, contends that because The Clean Air Act (CAA) displaced federal common law and because the CAA does not explicitly preempt 3 Boulder’s suit, the suit is not preempted. … -useer-state-reports. 17 Id. at 31. 18 Id. at 31, 109. 19 Id. at 31, 217. 12 In 2024, the energy sector represented 16.2 percent of statewide employment in Wyoming.20 In North Dakota during the same period
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Ali Danial Hemani
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 19, 2025
To the contrary, the historical record confirms that “[f]rom Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any … (cleaned up), cert. denied, 571 U.S. 989 (2013). In short, legislatures necessarily and lawfully may enact categorical rules to protect public safety. II.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Azar v. Allina Health Servs., 139 S. Ct. 51 (2018) (No. 17-1484)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Section (a)(2) also requires notice-and-comment for “requirements,” a term the APA does not even use. Section (a)(2) has a minimum 60-day minimum comment period, 42 U.S.C. … The Department’s response to this second notice- and-comment requirement is to say that it was acting by way of adjudication, rather than rulemaking. Gov't Br. 46-49.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 20, 2023
(cleaned up). … S. 808, 828 (1991) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Borden Ranch Partnership v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Water Act § 307, 33 U.S.C. § 1817..........cccccccccccceeeee 6 Clean Water Act § 402, 33 U.S.C. § 1342.00.00... 5,6 Clean Water Act § 404, 33 U.S.C. § 1344.00.00... passim Clean Water Act § 502, 33 … The Clean Water Act 1972 Act.
536 U.S. 981Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 14, 2023
(cleaned up)); Torres Rivera v. … (cleaned up)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bersani v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Hanson, 623 F.Supp. 1539 (B.D.N.C. 1985) ..........ccccccssseees 2 STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (1982) ......... 4,8,9,13,17,18 … , Practice and Emerging Problems of Wetlands Regulation: Reconsider- ing Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, 17 Land & Water L.
489 U.S. 1089Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2024
Amici or their members have for decades operated under Clean Water Act (“CWA” or “Act”) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permits as they provide stormwater and sanitation services … EPA, Watershed Academy Web: Introduction to the Clean Water Act § 34, https://cfpub.epa.gov/watertrain/moduleFrame.cfm?parent_object_id=2673.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
I cc tia asiinlicinaiie 2, 17,19 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. $ 1S11................00c0...00..-.5. 2 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1316 ......................00...... 2 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1342 … 402 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1342.
Amicus Curiae Brief — City of New York v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1970
\The period since then has been occupied with the writing and printing of this brief. … The Air Pellution Control District has expended. approximately. $60,000,000. of “pulilic funds since its creation under the Act.
397 U.S. 248Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 3, 2019
Congress enacted the Clean Water Act (CWA or Act), 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters,” 33 U.S.C. 1251(a), while “recogniz … The EPA noted that federal courts had disagreed about the Act’s applicability to discharges through groundwater, id. at 7127-7128, and it requested comment from Tribes, States, members of the public, and
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 5, 2024
Moreover, waxy crude oil is unlikely to ever seep into the water supply because it will be easy to clean up even if a derailment were to occur. … The project would decrease air pollution caused by the numerous semis on the roads and generate well-paying, long-term employment opportunities for Basin residents.
Amicus Curiae Brief — James City County v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
From the Desert Land Act of 1877, through the Reclamation Act of 1902, down to section 101(g) of the Clean Water Act, Congress has recognized the primary role of the States in regulating and allocating … CONCLUSION This case raises an important issue in the administration of the Clean Water Act.
513 U.S. 823Amicus Curiae Brief — Abdur'Rahman v. Bell
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
In any event, forensic tests would have detected traces of blood, even if the coat had been cleaned. H.T. 35-36, 59-61. … from day to night” and was acting "crazy." Notes on Miller's statement indicated that it suggested "Insanity and [a] mitigating factor." H.
537 U.S. 88Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
In the 1970s, new regulatory laws were enacted and directed at the protection of the envi- ronment — the federal Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Coastal Zone Management Act, National Environ- mental … Policy Act, etc.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
(b) (1964) ...........5.. 8 The Clean Water Restoration Act of 1966, 33 U.S.C … IV, 1969) ........... eee ee eee 7 The Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act, 42 U.S.C. § 263i(e) (Supp. IV, 1969) wks ke ere Rey 7 The Air Quality Act of 1967, 42 US.C.
416 U.S. 470Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Tallman, 380 U.S. 1 (1965).................... 8 STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. … Compliance With Federally-Approved Water Quality Standards Is The Paramount Objective Of The Clean Water Act.
499 U.S. 946Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 17, 2022
Research Service, The Wetlands Coverage of the Clean Water Act (CWA): Rapanos and Beyond (Apr. 27, 2016) (describing basis for EPA’s 2015 Clean Water Rule), RL33263, at 13. … ADOPTING PETITIONERS’ PROPOSAL WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY UNDERMINE EPA’S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT. A.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Citizens for Clean Air v. City of Spokane, 114 Wash. 2d 20, 785 P.2d 447 (1990). … Code ch. 173-306 (1990), to implement the Act.
511 U.S. 328
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.