Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Ali Danial Hemani
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 19, 2025
To the contrary, the historical record confirms that “[f]rom Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any … (cleaned up), cert. denied, 571 U.S. 989 (2013). In short, legislatures necessarily and lawfully may enact categorical rules to protect public safety. II.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2023
Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) ................................... 21 Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Tr. Fund. v. … Where a statute of limitations comes into play, “the limitations period commences when the plaintiff has a ‘complete and present cause of action.’” Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Tr.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
Boulder, however, contends that because The Clean Air Act (CAA) displaced federal common law and because the CAA does not explicitly preempt 3 Boulder’s suit, the suit is not preempted. … -useer-state-reports. 17 Id. at 31. 18 Id. at 31, 109. 19 Id. at 31, 217. 12 In 2024, the energy sector represented 16.2 percent of statewide employment in Wyoming.20 In North Dakota during the same period
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 3, 2019
Congress enacted the Clean Water Act (CWA or Act), 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters,” 33 U.S.C. 1251(a), while “recogniz … The EPA noted that federal courts had disagreed about the Act’s applicability to discharges through groundwater, id. at 7127-7128, and it requested comment from Tribes, States, members of the public, and
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 14, 2023
(cleaned up)); Torres Rivera v. … (cleaned up)).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 18, 2022
For years, amici have worked with federal regulators to develop administrable standards under the Clean Water Act, submitting comments in response to proposed definitions of “waters of the United States … In short, the Clean Water Act reflects a balance.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hansen v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
IT, § 218(a)(S), 98 Stat. 2027 (1984) 0000... 12 Occupational Safety and Health Act, a asesmsenbenans 6 Clean Water Act, RE 8 ol 2 i FS enn 3 iV Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C … In the present case, the petitioner was convicted of felonies under criminal provisions of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c)(2)(A), and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA
535 U.S. 1111Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 1, 2022
.. 16 Secretary of the Air Force, Department of the Air Force Instruction 52-201, Religious Freedom in the Department of the Air Force (June 23, 2021) .. 16 S. … O 6 Secretary of the Air Force, Air Force Instruction 36-2903, Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel, ¶ A8.1 (Feb. 7, 2020), https://perma.cc/G72G-ZQ2T. 7 Secretary of the Air Force, Department
Amicus Curiae Brief — Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Summerfield
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1954
C. $401) as the “Act”. … A. 45, 55 (1939).° The relationship between section 406(b) and section 2 of the Act was also recognized by this Court in Transcon- tinental & Western Air, Inc. v.
347 U.S. 74Amicus Curiae Brief — Bennett v. Spear
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Gorsuch, 688 F.2d 1263 (9th Cir. 1982), which 4 involved standing under the Clean Water Act’s citizen-suit provision. … It should be evident that the scope of citizen-suit provisions in our environmental statutes has been the subject of vigorous litigation for decades, including the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, Resource
520 U.S. 154Amicus Curiae Brief — Borden Ranch Partnership v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Water Act § 307, 33 U.S.C. § 1817..........cccccccccccceeeee 6 Clean Water Act § 402, 33 U.S.C. § 1342.00.00... 5,6 Clean Water Act § 404, 33 U.S.C. § 1344.00.00... passim Clean Water Act § 502, 33 … The Clean Water Act 1972 Act.
536 U.S. 981Amicus Curiae Brief — James City County v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
The Clean Water Act clearly requires EPA to consider the need for water supplies in determining whether to veto a particular project on environmental grounds. … The Clean Water Act Requires EPA to Consider the Need for Water Supplies.
513 U.S. 823Amicus Curiae Brief — Deboer v. Snyder, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-571)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
If the media air anything considered discriminatory towards GLBT, broadcasting licenses can be revoked, and “human rights bodies” can charge fines and restrict future airings. … More difficult days were ahead, however, as I cleaned his home after his death.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Tanco v. Haslam, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-562)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
If the media air anything considered discriminatory towards GLBT, broadcasting licenses can be revoked, and “human rights bodies” can charge fines and restrict future airings. … More difficult days were ahead, however, as I cleaned his home after his death.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 17, 2022
” in the Clean Water Act is limited by whatever scope that term had in section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. 3 ARGUMENT The Clean Water Act generally prohibits unpermitted discharges of pollutants … Statutory language and context confirm that the Clean Water Act does not mirror section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
In the 1970s, new regulatory laws were enacted and directed at the protection of the envi- ronment — the federal Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Coastal Zone Management Act, National Environ- mental … Policy Act, etc.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Linde Air Products Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 .....ccecceeceeeeersenenennsensenennrsecers Co., 339 U.S. GOS (1950) .....csccsccccccccccscres passim Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. … Third, equating the doctrine to an equitable writ will generate needless litigation over collateral issues (clean hands, for example) 11 Amicus believes the difference in pH between Petitioner’s process
520 U.S. 17Amicus Curiae Brief — Azar v. Allina Health Servs., 139 S. Ct. 51 (2018) (No. 17-1484)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Section (a)(2) also requires notice-and-comment for “requirements,” a term the APA does not even use. Section (a)(2) has a minimum 60-day minimum comment period, 42 U.S.C. … The Department’s response to this second notice- and-comment requirement is to say that it was acting by way of adjudication, rather than rulemaking. Gov't Br. 46-49.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bersani v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Hanson, 623 F.Supp. 1539 (B.D.N.C. 1985) ..........ccccccssseees 2 STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (1982) ......... 4,8,9,13,17,18 … , Practice and Emerging Problems of Wetlands Regulation: Reconsider- ing Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, 17 Land & Water L.
489 U.S. 1089Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 3, 2019
Congress enacted the Clean Water Act (CWA or Act), 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters,” 33 U.S.C. 1251(a), while “recogniz … The EPA noted that federal courts had disagreed about the Act’s applicability to discharges through groundwater, id. at 7127-7128, and it requested comment from Tribes, States, members of the public, and
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.