Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

Resource recovery facilities and incinerators must comply with strict emissions requirements promulgated pursuant to the Clean Air Act.** Moreover, EPA’s recent promulga- 10 The only potentially environmentally … OF that such discarded materials be disposed of . . . by [an] environ- mentally sound method of disposal, including incineration that does not conflict with the Clean Air Act.” H.R. Rep.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006), a case addressing the scope of the Clean Water Act (CWA). … Rather than 16 supporting the Second Circuit’s holding, American Textile actually supports the validity of the EPA’s use of cost-benefit analysis under the relevant provision of the Clean Water Act

Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Tallman, 380 U.S. 1 (1965).................... 8 STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. … Compliance With Federally-Approved Water Quality Standards Is The Paramount Objective Of The Clean Water Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al., Petitioners v. Sierra Club, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2020

The EPA issued the Sacketts a compliance order claiming various Clean Water Act violations because, according to EPA, the lot contained wetlands. Id. at 122. … The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Clean Water Act precluded judicial review of compliance orders and dismissed the case for want of jurisdiction. Id. at 125.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Murr v. Wisconsin, 136 S. Ct. 890 (2016) (No. 15-214)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

In Penn Central, the Court refused to treat air rights as a separate prop- erty for Fifth Amendment purposes from the surface structure below even though New York law treated air rights as a distinct … A subdivision developer of an area near wet- lands, for example, might choose to carve out several separate lots that contained only wetlands so that, if a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit to fill

Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Sackett, et ux., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 17, 2022

” in the Clean Water Act is limited by whatever scope that term had in section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. 3 ARGUMENT The Clean Water Act generally prohibits unpermitted discharges of pollutants … Statutory language and context confirm that the Clean Water Act does not mirror section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Loper Bright Enterprises, et al., Petitioners v. Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 15, 2022

Ct. at 2604 (White House described Clean Power Plan as “aggressive transformation in the domestic energy industry”); Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. … Medicare Act and the APA.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2025

no lawsuit yet) to submit public comment on a proposed regulatory action that might or might not come to fruition? … Here is the disconnect: for cases brought in federal courts, like the lower court here, under the Administrative Procedure Act (generally) or the Clean Air Act provision at issue here, 42 U.S.C. § 7607

Amicus Curiae Brief — PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. v. Book

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Linde Air Products OE ee 4 Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79 (2000) .......cccccccecseeeceeeeeneeeees 15-16 Howsam v. … Michigan Window Cleaning Co., 327 U.S. 173 (1945), or the federal securities laws, see Shearson/American Express, Inc. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Learning Resources, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 24, 2025

Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103 (1948) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 City of Decatur v. … Id. at 52 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Teck Metals Ltd., fka Teck Cominco Metals Ltd., a Canadian corporation, Petitioner v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 28, 2026

EPA, 598 U.S. 651 (2023) (representing private landowners in a challenge to the EPA’s regulation of property under the Clean Water Act lacking a direct surface connection to waters of the United States … off the Antiquities Act of 1906, id. at §§ 320301-320303.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Port of Tacoma, et al., Petitioners v. Puget Soundkeeper Alliance

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 28, 2024

COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM PRINCIPLES MUST DRIVE ANY INTERPRETATION OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT The Clean Water Act “establishes a distinctive variety of cooperative federalism.” … FEDERALISM PRINCIPLES UNDERLIE ANY CLEAN WATER ACT INTERPRETATION.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gosa v. Mayden

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973

We have been advised that the Air Force does not keep comparable statistics. … He was next employed cleaning the interiors of airplanes, first for American Airlines, later for United.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

FF Fe) FT FS PPPrrererrrerrrire 10 STATUTES PAGE Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553 ..... 12 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387 ......... 2 Section 101(b), 33 U.S.C. § 1251(b) ...... … Colorado strongly supports the concepts and goals expressed in the Clean Water Act ("CWA") and its amendments.’

Amicus Curiae Brief — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Rather, it derives that gloss from other provisions of the Clean Water Act. … If the State, inter- state agency, or Administrator, as the case may be, fails or refuses to act on a request for certification, within a reason- able period of time (which shall not exceed one year

Amicus Curiae Brief — HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Renewable Fuels Association, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 11, 2020

Congress amended the Clean Air Act in 2005 and 2007 in response to the country’s once dwindling oil 4 reserves to “move the United States toward greater energy independence and security” through “increase … [d] production of clean renewable fuels[.]”

Amicus Curiae Brief — RADesign, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Michael Grecco Productions, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 26, 2025

In “ordinary” infringement actions “each infringing act is a discrete wrong triggering a new limitations period.” Ibid. However, after this Court’s decision in Warner Chappell Music v. … within the three-year lookback period.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Competitive Enterprise Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Michael E. Mann

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 5, 2019

A First Amendment inquiry may involve a clean “question of law.” See, e.g., HarteHanks Commc’ns, Inc. v. Connaughton, 491 U.S. 657, 685 (1989). … Ibid.; see also Akhil Reed Amar, Some Comments on “The Bill of Rights as a Constitution”, 15 Harv. J. L. & Pub.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Bestfoods

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

See 33 U.S.C. § 1362(5) (Clean Water Act); 42 U.S.C. §6903(15) (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act). … any act relating to hazardous substances.

Amicus Curiae Brief — James City County v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

The Clean Water Act clearly requires EPA to consider the need for water supplies in determining whether to veto a particular project on environmental grounds. … The Clean Water Act Requires EPA to Consider the Need for Water Supplies.