Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.31s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2022
Impac Ltd., 432 U.S. 312 (1977)................................................................................................... 11 ii Utility Air Regul. Grp. v. … Id. at 2609 (quoting Utility Air Regul. Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014)). Yet the EPA produced no “clear congressional authorization” for its action. Id. at 2614.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Matthew Fox, et al., Petitioners v. Charles A. Summers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 3, 2021
(citation omitted)); Dep’t of Air Force v. … Laws Serv. §§ 764.26a(1), 28.243(8) (LexisNexis 2021); see also Pennsylvania’s Clean Slate Law, 2018 Pa. Laws 56, codified at 18 Pa. Cons.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Baker Botts, L.L.P. v. Asarco, L.L.C., 135 S. Ct. 697 (2014) (No. 14-103)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Delaware Valley Citi- zens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 559 ” 764 F.2d 655, 662 (9th Cir. 1985). … * 496 U.S. 154, 165-66 (1990). 23 (1986) (fees for postjudgment proceedings to enforce consent decree properly compensable as a cost litigation under § 304(d) of the Clean Air Act); New York Gaslight
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
This Act may be cited as the ‘Federal Water Pollution Control Act’ commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act.”). 6 In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … Cameron, The Clean Water Act 20 Years Later 5-7 (1993).
547 U.S. 715Amicus Curiae Brief — Pure Waters, Inc. v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
(also commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. 1251(a)(1) et seq. … imposed by the Federal Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act, commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1251 et seq.
519 U.S. 864Amicus Curiae Brief — Securities and Exchange Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Michelle Cochran
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 7, 2022
See also Air Courier Conference v. Am. … Online 261, 262 (2016) (“During the period from October 2010 to March 2015, the SEC prevailed against 90% of respondents in contested cases heard by ALJs, and in the same period the SEC had a considerably
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 22, 2020
Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, MB Docket No. 18-349, Comments of the National Association of Broadcasters (May 29, 2019), https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10429077016730 … of 1996, MB Docket No. 18-349, Reply Comments of TEGNA Inc.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Andreen, Water Quality Today— Has the Clean Water Act Been a Success? … * o 7 The Clean Water Act strikes a careful balance.
568 U.S. 1118Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 23, 2024
O’Handley involves a First Amendment challenge to a California censorship statute that required Twitter (now X) to remove the plaintiff’s comments regarding California’s elections as “misinformation.” … When Platforms act in concert with the government to remove specific user content from their sites, they are acting as state actors, not private entities.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Twitter, Inc., Petitioner v. Mehier Taamneh, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 18, 2023
(cleaned up). … United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 484 (1999), overturned on other grounds due to legislative action, Pub. L. No. 110-325 (2009); Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
The proposed regulation, but not the preamble, was published for notice and comment. 51 Fed. Reg. 41,206. … ’ permitting authority under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
531 U.S. 159Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Accord- ingly, in regions with relatively clean baseload power systems, shifting consumption away from high de- mand periods may reduce emissions of carbon dioxide * Customers reducing electricity … See Comments of Md. Pub. Serv. Comm'n 4, FERC Docket No.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sunoco LP, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 5, 2023
It held unanimously that the climate claims there sounded in the federal common law and that Congress displaced any such claims when it enacted the Clean Air Act. See id. at 424. … Second, and only after determining the claims arose under federal common law, did the Court hold that Congress displaced through the Clean Air Act remedies that might be granted under federal common law
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 9, 2022
See Act of Dec. 21, 1904, ch. 22, 33 Stat. 595 (“1904 Act”). … Water Act, Clean Air Act, and other environmental statutes.
Amicus Curiae Brief — National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. VP Buildings, Inc., (2010) (No. 711)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
Inc.), 99% F.2d 915, 934 (1st Cir. 1993) (if creditor held a valid «}.m for clean-up costs under CERCLA, “past and future [clean-up] costs should be estimated and allowed as administrative expenses … Eastern Air Lines v. Insurance Co. of State of Penn.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 27, 2023
Id. at 622 (cleaned up). … See Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-394, § 111(a), 108 Stat. 4113 (adding 11 U.S.C. § 524(g)); S.L. Esserman & D.J.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Shelby County, Iowa, et al., Petitioners v. William Couser, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 6, 2025
Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., 541 U.S. 246 (2004).............................................. 4 iii Fla. Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. … Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., 541 U.S. 246, 252 (2004) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Dead Sea Bromine Co., Ltd. v. Patrickson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
M/T Pavel Dybenko, 99\ ET 15-16 Coalition for Clean Air v. Southern Cal. Edison Co., 971 F.2d 219 (9th Cir. 1992)... 13 Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. … See, e.g., Coalition for Clean Air v. Southern Cal.
537 U.S. 1185Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2025
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) .................................................. 28 Solomon v. St. … United States, 588 U.S. 128, 141 (2019) (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 23, 2024
O’Handley involves a First Amendment challenge to a California censorship statute that required Twitter (now X) to remove the plaintiff’s comments regarding California’s elections as “misinformation.” … When Platforms act in concert with the government to remove specific user content from their sites, they are acting as state actors, not private entities.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.