Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.07s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) . 6 STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: Federal: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7543 ..... 8 Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1146 _. ee x … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7543(a) (“relating to the control of [motor vehicle} emissions”).
505 U.S. 88Amicus Curiae Brief — Ferring B.V. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. (No. 06-372)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
They apply the maxim requiring clean hands only where some unconscionable act of one coming for relief has immediate and necessary relation to the equity that he seeks in respect of the matter in litigation … Air Freight System, Inc. v. NLRB, 510 U.S. 317 (1993).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
Although Congress displaced federal common law through enactment of the Clean Air Act, Congress did not authorize local counties to impose their own claimed solution to a global phenomenon by invocation … Finally, Petitioners are correct that the Clean Air Act independently preempts Respondents’ claims. The Clean Air Act conflicts with state-law efforts to impose liability for out-of-state emissions.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
service agency, such as the defendant corporate provider in that case). 13 upheld a regulation of the Environmental Protection Agency, on the ground that it was a_ permissible construction of the Clean … Air Act.
551 U.S. 158Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026
Air Act’s regulatory scheme directing EPA to set such standards (id. at 44–46). … Allowing those claims to proceed does not introduce competing regulations of emissions that are preempted by structural constitutional principles or the Clean Air Act, as petitioners argue. 20 CONCLUSION
Amicus Curiae Brief — Burlington Northern Inc. v. Herold
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Reflectorized tape has a tendency to peel and, like other reflectorized material, is difficult and expensive to maintain in clean condition under general conditions of use. … The consequences of the decision below, which can only have the effect of discouraging voluntary use of optional 18 At least one railroad is currently in the process of installing (over a three-year period
474 U.S. 888Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026
Hyatt, 587 U.S. at 238-39 (cleaned up). … In AEP, federal common law was displaced because Congress addressed both the conduct (source pollution) and the remedy (emission caps) in the Clean Air Act; there is no evidence that Congress has spoken
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 10, 2021
Ginsburg & Steven Menashi, Our Illiberal Admin- istrative Law, 10 N.Y.U.J.L. & Liberty 475, 477 (2016) (cleaned up). 20 Marbury v. … Air Regul. Grp. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
The flow of water through a dam is not a “discharge” within the meaning of Section 401 of the Clean Water Act..........:ccccsesssseseseneseseeees 3 II. … BH TAU ccocrsnccnsecatesssnttnsiiinduidadaiimaaniines i, et passim Clean Water Act Section 402, 33 U.S.C. § 1342 Clean Water Act Section 404, 33 U.S.C. § 1344 OTHER MATERIALS 58 Fed.
547 U.S. 370Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 17, 2023
The EPA claimed that the “vague 6 bit.ly/2HyrFrP. 16 language of an ancillary provision of the [Clean Air Act]” granted it authority to unilaterally demand “a shift throughout the power grid from one … Comments of Andrew N.
Amicus Curiae Brief — South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
It would be illogical to interpret the Clean Water Act in this manner, and the federal circuits are consistent in their interpretation of the Act to prevent such a result. … Considering both to be a “singular entity” would frustrate the purpose of the Clean Water Act. Jd.
539 U.S. 957Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2024
III, § 321(a)(3)(B), 137 Stat. 10, 38 (Builder Act). … Joint Comments at 9; cf.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 8, 2020
(1950), the Clean Air Act (1970), the Clean Water Act (1972), and CERCLA (1980). … within 90 days of any regulation promulgated, but not specifying that relief should extend to nonparties); Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b) (providing complex provisions for review of covered rules, but
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 26, 2018
The Court held the Environmental Protection Agency therefore had no obligation to consult regarding its delegation of permitting authority under the Clean Water Act to the State of Arizona, where the provision … of the Clean Water Act governing delegation did not allow for additional potential criteria arising from ESA consultation.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2023
This was also the time period in which OSHA began to take action against other state plans. … (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hughes v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 940 (2018) (No. 17-155)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Army Corps of Engineers over the “waters of the United States,” a term of art used in the Clean Water Act. … Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121 (1985), in the case of Clean Water Act juris- diction.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
In Boraas, “quality of life" was said to take into account family values, youth values, the blessing of quiet seclusion and clean air. … In 1976 the City of Seattle amended its zoning code following a long period of study and discussion of the problems of adult movie theatres in its residential areas.
475 U.S. 41Amicus Curiae Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 21, 2023
It held unanimously that the climate claims there sounded in the federal common law and that Congress displaced any such claims when it enacted the Clean Air Act. See id. at 424. … Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Professional Pilots Federation v. Federal Aviation Administration
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
ALPA Comments, R. 356); (2) emphasis on the recommendations of the 1981 NIH Report as a basis for rejecting the recommendations of the 1993 Hilton Report (APA Comments, R. 298: ALPA Comments, R. 353 … In the same period, the FAA has seen fit to do nothing with the Age 60 Rule. | 9 performance checks.
523 U.S. 1117Amicus Curiae Brief — Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Commentators have made the same distinction, e.g., Wendy J. … Cole Porter’s song “Night and Day” was licensed for use in advertisements for Audi and for Air France.
510 U.S. 569
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.