Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
brief for appellee — Zablocki v. Redhail
Supreme Court brief · brief for appellee · 1978
Welker, 24 Wis. 2d 570, 129 N. W. 2d 134 PP rrrrrrrrrire rie e 41 Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (10% 24 Wooley v. Maynard, U.S. , 45 U.S. L. W. 4379 (dec'd. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970). In San Antonio Ind. School District v.
434 U.S. 374Supreme Court brief · Response to application from respondent Luxshare, Ltd. · Oct 21, 2021
See New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. at 418; Hannah, 363 U.S. at 422 & See United States v. … See Article 12 (1) (d) Rome I Regulation. 9 24.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 29, 2025
Aug. 24, 2023). … Barnhart, 141 F.3d at 1312–13 (quoting Darden, 503 U.S. at 323–24).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bell v. Tug Shrike
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1964
’ as used in See 24. … G28, 70 S.Ct. 627.04 L.Ed. 14 I. 24 SOY, cert. den. 33* Gelita v United States. 83 Fsupp. 1003; Cavanaugh v United States; D.C., 94 F.Supp. 776.
379 U.S. 844Amicus Curiae Brief — U.S. Army Corp of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 615 (2015) (No. 15-290)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Tax 399 (N.J. Tax Ct. 1992)........... 25 Deerfield Plantation Phase II B Prop. Owners Ass'n v. S.C. Dep't of Health & Envtl. … Feinstein Family P’ship, No. 96-232-CIV-FTM-24(D), 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28 penalty provisions.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 24, 2022
Viscotti, 537 U.S. 19, 24 (2002) (per curiam)). … Nowack, 462 Mich. 392, 399-400, 614 N.W.2d 78 (2000); People v.
Respondents Brief — Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1998
JA 24. Counsel also advised the district court that this Court had recently granted certiorari in Lindh v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. at 423-24 (Powell, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment).
523 U.S. 637Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Patterson v. Matanuska Maid, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 108 S.Ct. 1677, 100 L5BG.30 410 41986)... .. 2. se © 3 Linn v. … Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 403 & n. 2 (1988). See generally 2 Vv j w 1556-59 (Charles J.
513 U.S. 1127Petition — Association of Massachusetts Consumers, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
Securities and Ea- change Commission, 346 F.2d 399 (1st Cir. 1965) 4 New England Electric System v. … Decided July 24, 1975.
423 U.S. 1052Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 25, 2021
(See transcript pages 369-372; 376-381; 385-389; and 394-399 attached as part of Ex. A). … (See transcript pages 369-372; 376-381; 385-389; and 394-399 attached as part of Ex. A).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Boyanowski v. Capital Area Intermediate Unit
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000
Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 153 (1973); Meyer, 262 — U.S. at 399-400. … Supp, 399. 399, 411 (E.D. Pa. 1994) (citing Williamson v. Consol, Rail Corp, 926 F.2d 1344, 1353 (3d Cir 1991), aff'd, 60 F.3d 814 (3d cir. 1995).
531 U.S. 1011Petitioners Brief — Ferguson v. Charleston
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2001
Chasnoff Tr. 12:9-24 (JA 281-82); Horger 45:13-24 (JA 673). … Condon Tr. 23:4-24:4 (JA 357-58).
532 U.S. 67Reply Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 27, 2024
Grey, No. 24-cv-1611 (S.D. Cal.). The Board pretends this isn’t happening. … Nor did it matter in Sherbert that the unemployment benefits claimant was “willing[ ] to accept employment” elsewhere. 374 U.S. at 399 n.2.
Opposition — Rado v. Connecticut
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
The Court (Blumenfeld,J.) granted relief on Octo- ber 24, 1978. … Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970), than to Douglas. See also Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74 (1970).
447 U.S. 920Reply Brief — Raul Villarreal and Fidel Villarreal, Petitioners v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 2, 2018
Farias, 469 F.3d 393, 399-400 (5th Cir. 2006) (same). To the extent that they did, they failed to recognize the limitation noted in Watts, see, e.g., United States v. … Settles, 530 F.3d 920, 923-24 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (Kavanaugh, J.); see also United States v. Bell, 808 F.3d 926, 928 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (Kavanaugh, J., concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc).
Petitioners Reply Brief — Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New York
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1968
Board of Education of Philadelphia, 357 U.S. 399,,400, the Court upheld a school’ teacher’s dismissal for ‘‘incompetency’’ where the’ ‘‘incompetency’’. was evi- | denced by the teacher’s refusal ‘‘to … Collins, 349 F.2d 863 (24 Cir, 1965), cert.. denied, 383 US. 960, is not.to the contrary.
392 U.S. 280Supplemental Appendix — Beaudry Motor Co. v. Abko Properties, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 1986
( Supreme Court, U.S, Ww, FILED No. 85-2085 JUL 24 96g JOSEPH F. SPANIOL, JR, CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term, 1986 Beaudry Motor Company, Petitioner, v. … Campagna, 399 N.E.2d 1144, 1145 (NY Ct.App. 1979).
479 U.S. 825Opinion — United States v. Poland
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1920
United States, 240 U.S. 399, distinguished. Mr. Justice VAN Devanter delivered the opinion of the court. This is a suit to cancel a fiatent issued to William B. … The first steps consisted of limited extensions of the laws relating to mining claims, ¢. 53, 23 Stat. 24, § 8, and town sites, c. 561, UNITED STATES v. POLAND. 223 221.
251 U.S. 221Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Pampanga Sugar Mills v. Trinidad
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1929
* n 4 5 — 4 Ay Wesgan © ifs Cole Dap eT & <e * 4 wd 1 e gt oe f ig yi „ : A a ae’ 4 * une 339 4 an I pi dt VEE en 5 we 4 i 5 0 1 24 re! 5 ae gh * 1 * ** * SUBJECT-INDEX. … S. 389, 399; relied upon by the Philippine Supreme Court both in its opinion in this case (K 55-57, 61), and also in us former decision, Central Azucarera de Bas vo Trinidad, supra, 40 Phil.
279 U.S. 211Appendix b — Leal v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix b · 2002
(citing ; iti 452 U.S. 394, 399 n. 3,101 S. Ct. 2424 .. 2428 n 3, 69 L. Ed. 2d 103 (1981); Weissinger v. United States.423 F. 2d 795, 798 n. 4 (Sth Cir. 1970) (en banc); Lambert v. … JANIS GRAHAM JACK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24.
537 U.S. 822
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.