Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.65s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Food and Drug Administration, Petitioner v. Wages and White Lion Investments, L.L.C., dba Triton Distribution, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 15, 2024

    FDA, 399 F. Supp.3d 479, 487 (D. … Rev. 56:4 1175, 1179 (Fall 1989). 23 McGahn at 24:14 - 24:22. 22 countenanced its ad hoc review process. FDA implicitly argues for a continued adherence of Chenery II without directly saying so.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Total Quality Logistics, LLC, Petitioner v. Robert Cox, as Personal Representative and Special Administrator of the Estate of Greta Cox

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 5, 2025

    . § 1.87 ..................................................................... 9 49 C.F.R. part 40 ................................................................ 11 49 C.F.R. parts 300–399 .......... … The Federal Motor 10 Carrier Safety Regulations (“FMCSR”) span over 700 pages in the Code of Federal Regulations. 49 C.F.R. parts 300–399.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Stevie Gomez Contreras, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 15, 2025

    Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) .................................................................... 36 Zherka v. … Contreras, No. 24-50370 (5th Cir. July 17, 2025) (per curiam), is reproduced at Pet. App. 1a–2a.

  • Petition for Rehearing — Christopher Hadsell, Petitioner v. Catherine Isham

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Apr 24, 2026

    PETITION FOR REHEARING Sd Service on States’ and Territories’ Attorneys General o Christopher Hadsell Petitioner In Propria Persona 9000 Crow Canyon Rd., S-399, Danville, CA 94506 e (925) 482-6502 … Case No,: 25-00881 April 24, 2026 Petition for Rehearing 5 e.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Phipps v. Wilson

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

    The Estate on January 24, 1992, filed a motion to dismiss the will contest on the ground it was untimely. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 402, 86 S.Ct. 518, 15 L.Ed.2d 447, 450 (1966). The Indiana statutes which pro- vided for intestate inheritance gave Mrs.

    510 U.S. 1072
  • Opposition Brief — Coastal Petroleum Co. v. Chiles

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998

    Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 (1981) ........ 14 Neel v. … [Note: these consolidated cases are in the record below at Plaintiff's Ex. 1, R 4616-24.]. to be a specific reservation in favor of the State in the leases.

    524 U.S. 953
  • Petition — Brown v. Louisiana

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

    Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968) State v. … Florida 399 U.S. 78 (1970) foreshadowed the holding in Burch, thus obviating any good faith reliance on the State's part.

    444 U.S. 990
  • Petition — Verit Industries v. Ohashi

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976

    At the time he acquired his stock, Verit common stock was trading at $14 per share, but when he sold it, the price had fallen @24- to $1.50 per share. … Bell, 464 F.2d 399 (9th Cir. 1972).

    429 U.S. 1004
  • Brief for Respondent in Opposition — McCrary v. Aladdin Radio Industries, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent in Opposition · 1959

    Vir- ginia, 6 Wheat. 264, 399; “It is a maxim, not to be = disregarded, that general expressions, in every opinion, are to be taken in connection. with the case . in. … court, not on the theory of unfair labor practice, but: on the theory that, recognition. of a non- complying a . - ae 8 24 Stat. 379 (1887) as amended: 49 U. S. C. section 1, et seq.

    361 U.S. 865
  • Amicus Brief — Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

    W. 24 9 (1977) 14 Fisher v. Consolidated Freight Wrap, Inc., 12 Ore. App. 417, 507 P. ad 53 (1978) . . . . 13 Gasparick v. H. C. Price Construction Co., 399 Mich. 483, 490, 247 N. … Price Construction Co., 399 Mich. 433, 490, 247 N. W. 2d 824 (1976).

    451 U.S. 504
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari no — Elder v. Brannan

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari no · 1951

    Lexington Mill & Elevator Co., , 232 US. 399, - 409 . United States v: Morrow, US. 531, 534-535 _ OS States v. … S. 399, 409 ; Dewey v. United States, ods, U.S. 510, 520, 521; Houghton v. Payne, supra: Under the positive language of § 12; viewed in its signifi.

    341 U.S. 277
  • Brief on Behalf Amicus Curiae — United States v. Pink

    Supreme Court brief · Brief on Behalf Amicus Curiae · 1942

    Soviet government (R. 24). The answer denied such allegations \(R. 37). … for insufficiency the Court of Appeals said that (p. 399) “every fact set forth in the complaint ‘must be deemed to be true”.

    315 U.S. 203
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ari Misha Liggett, Petitioner v. Colorado

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 14, 2023

    App. 2020), affirmed by an equally divided court, 399 Wis.2d 324, 964 N.W.2d 342 (Mem), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 1442, 212 L. Ed. 2d 538 (2022) ........... 17 State v. … Harris, 401 U.S. at 225-26; Hass, 420 U.S. at 722-24.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Whirlpool Financial Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 4, 2022

    Pelzer, 312 U.S. 399 (1941) ........................................... 19 v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—continued Page United States v. … See Pet. at 24. That is, until the Sixth Circuit majority held as much (despite no party, including the Government, arguing for that holding).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Melvin Trotter, Petitioner v. Florida, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 19, 2026

    Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 410 (1986) ............................................................. 5 Glossip v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 410 (1986). [SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 5 REASONS FOR GRANTING THIS PETITION I.

  • Record and brief — Missouri v. McNeely

    Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2013

    Robinson, IE sei scnsths iniiccidcishenspneeasncceseoesss 24, 25 Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1970)..................06.. 17 Virginia v. … Bohling, 173 Wis.2d 24 529, 494 N.W.2d 399 (1993) (cert. den., 510 U.S. 836).

    569 U.S. 141
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Zongli Chang, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 8, 2020

    Ely, 468 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2006) United States v. Carpenter, 317 F.3d 618 (6th Cir. 2003) United States v. Castello, 611 F.3d 399 (2d Cir. 2006) United States v. … is also within the statutory fine of $250,000". 468 F.3d 399, 403 (6th Cir. 2006).

  • Opposition Brief — Rodeo Music Corp. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1970

    nN Hazel Bishop, Inc. v: Bastard Inc:;-314°F. - hace 2d 399, 402-403. … July 5, 1946,.c. 541, ‘Title VI. § 39, 60 Stat.’440; June 25, "1948, t- 646, §§ T,-32(a), “62 Stat.. 870. 991; May 24, 1949, c.. 139, § 127, 63 Sfat. 107. : < » 15 US.C, § 1127. ) § 1127.

    400 U.S. 828
  • Opposition Brief — Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

    F.C.C., 399 F.2d 65 (Sth Cir. 1968) .......ccscesseeseeseesseereseeseeseeeeensenaeees 26,27 Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954) «.-...-s+++0+ 16 Buckley v. … United States, 288 F.2d 584, 587 (4th Cir. 1956), (Cable service is ‘‘a mere adjunct of the television receiving sets with which it was connected ...’’). 24 tem, Inc. v.

    486 U.S. 1032
  • Opposition Brief — Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

    F.C.C., 399 F.2d 65 (Sth Cir. 1968) ...........sscccsssecsreessresseseesssseeeneees 26,27 Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954)... 16 Buckley v. … United States, 238 F.2d 584, 587 (4th Cir. 1956), (Cable -service is ‘‘a mere adjunct of the television receiving sets with which it was connected ...”’). 24 tem, Inc. v.

    486 U.S. 1032

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.