Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Christopher J. Rahaim, Petitioner v. Ken Burke, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, Florida, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 2, 2025

State: 24-12630-G 4 2. Rahaim v. State: 24-14175-J 3. Rahaim v. State: 25-10142-F TABLE OF CONTENTS pages. JURISDICTION / ° CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED... … Stat. $ 119.01 and Article 1$ 24 Florida Constitution. 70.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Barbara, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2026

Hall, 4 Cal. 399 (1854)................................................ 18 Quock Ting v. United States, 140 U. S. 417 (1891) .................................... 21, 22 Tape v. … Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) ................. 7, 8, 9, 11, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27 Yick Wo v.

Opposition Brief — Blake v. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994

of Worcester, 412 Mass. 20, 24 (1992); Layne v. Superinten- dent, Mass. Correctional Inst., Cedar Junction, 406 Mass. 156, 158 (1989); Pheasant Ridge Assoc. Ltd. Partnership v. … Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc., 399 Mass. 93, 104 (1987) (O’Connor, J., dissenting); Delaney v. Chief of Police of Wareham, 27 Mass. App.

Opposition Brief — Lanham Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004

The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on August 24, 2004. The jurisdiction of this court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1). . STATEMENT 1. … Kia Motors America, Inc., 357 F.3d 392, 398-399 (3d Cir. 2004). The next step is typically to examine the defendant’s petition for removal. Mehlenbacher, 216 F.3d at 296.

Reply Brief — Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Chittum

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996

with evidence of Chit- tum’s likely future pay increases, R. 292A-292E, as well as his inability to increase the retirement pension annuity he would re- ceive after his disability annuity expired, R. 399 … Respondent’s tortured history of the Culver case, Opp. 23-24, does nothing to reduce the relevance of this issue under the LHWCA.

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Hostetter v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1941

Herbert Hostetter, (Unre- ported opinion of the Orphans’ Court)..... 19 In re Estate of Miller, 184 Cal. 674.............. 11 In re Estate of Rath, 10 Cal. (2d) 399.......... 11 In re Heilbron Bros … A. 413........ 24 Lentz v. Commissioner, 21 B. T. A. 1336, 1342.. 24 Quinn v. Union Nat. Bk., 32 Fed. (2d) 762...... 13 United States v. Kombst, 286 U.S. 424......... 11 Washburn v.

Opinion — Nadal v. May

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1914

The validating act of February 24, 1903, was not ef- fectual. … Eq. 394, 399; Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Texas, 170 U. 8. 243, 261. See also Gunn v. Barry, 15 Wall. 610, 622; Ar- nett v. Reade, 220 U.S. 311, 320.

Opinion — Munsey v. Webb

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1913

A. 399. To the same effect are: Reeves vy. Wallace, 10 Wall. 176; Morrison vy. Davis, 20 Pa. St. 293; Cuff v. N. & M. Y. R. Co., 35 N. J. L. 18; Smith v. Kanawha County (West Va.), 8 L. R. … (Va.), 24 8. E. Rep. 467; Fowlks v. Southern Ry. Co. (Va.), 32 8. E. Rep. 464; Winfree v. Jones (Va.), 51 S. E. Rep. 153; S. C., 1 L. R. A. (N. S.), 201.

Reply Brief — Carlos Javier Pedroza-Rocha, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 22, 2020

BIO 21–24. This misinterprets Mendoza-Lopez. … Contrary to the government’s assertion, BIO 24–25, he meets the remaining § 1326(d) requirements.

Brief for the Respondent in Oppositionmm — Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Cabot Carbon Co.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Oppositionmm · 1954

Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., 4 F. 24 399, appeal dismissed 269 U.S. 527. 24 Columbian Fuel Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 271 P.2d 773 . oat 17 Consumers Gas Co. v. … Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 390... 24 State ex rel. Roth v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P., Petitioner v. Powder Springs Logistics, LLC, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 11, 2026

(D.I. 397 at 24; D.I. 399, ex. … (D.I. 397 at 24 (citing D.I. 399, ex. B at ¶¶ 105-07)) But all that Dr.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Acosta v. Texas (No. 05-1574)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508 (2003) Justifies A Reexamination Of The Anti ee ee ie 13 CAME i ss eek os bP eK cas Hamre ee 24 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES FEDERAL CASES Bowers … Each state is obligated to follow the Constitution. 24 It should also be remembered that the statute extends beyond commercial transactions.

Brief for the United States — United States v. Ragen

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1942

OE a 24 at all follow that even where some services may have been rendered, the distributions may not be dividends in their entirety. … Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 296, 399.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bharanidharan Padmanabhan, Petitioner v. Drug Enforcement Administration

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 25, 2019

Robert Chatfield-Taylor, 399 Mass. 1 (1987) 19,23 Flyers Rights Educ. Fund v. FAA, 864 F.3d 738 (DC Cir. 2017). 2 Gonzales v. … Robert Chatfield-Taylor, 399 Mass. 1 (1987).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brian L. Melson, Petitioner v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 7, 2022

Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 412 114 S.Ct. 958, 127 L.Ed.2d 252 (1994)____ Mattz v. Arnett 412 U.S. 481, 504, n. 22, 93 S.Ct. 2245, 37 L.Ed.2d (1973) Nebraska v. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 412 114 S.Ct. 958, 127 L.Ed.2d 252 (1994). Likewise, Congress might speak of a reservation as being “’discontinued, ” “abolished,” or “vacated.”Mattz v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lawrence T. Newman, Petitioner v. Robert W. York

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 9, 2021

Johnson et al, 24 How., 203; Boswell's Lessee v. Otis et al., 9 How., 350; Oakley v. Aspinwall, 4 Comst., 514. … process has been interpreted by this Court as preventing the states from denying litigants use of established adjudicatory procedures, when such an action would be “the equivalent of denying them an 24

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Schwartz v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970

The Penal Code Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, § 302, 18 P. … The Penal Code, Act of June 24, 1939, P.

Petitioners Brief — Collins v. Youngblood

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1990

Graham, 450 U.S. 24 (1981). . .9,10,13,14,20 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970).......... 23 Constitutions, Statutes and Rules eR be eee YS ree 2,8 ee Coes oa eee oko 2 Tex. Code Crim. … Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981).

Petitioners Brief — Collins v. Youngblood

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1990

Graham, 450 U.S. 24 (1981). . .9,10,13,14,20 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). ......... 23 Constitutions, Statutes and Rules IJ te penes 2.8 ß, ˙ ek ee ˙ oe bt 2 Tex. Code Crim. Proc. … Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981).

Amicus Brief — Colorado v. Quintero

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1983

City of Houston, 689 F. 2d 1220 (5th Cir. 1982). 24. … Interview with James Larkin, Assistant District Attorney of Harris County, Texas, in Houston, Nov. 24, 1980.