Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.72s
Vol IV — Nye & Nissen v. United States (No. 228)
Supreme Court brief · Vol IV · 1948
Sou liave the , Witness identify the period of his sna dno and s he is not employed during the period of that. © dates. i yee . Mr.. Faulkner: | December Sth. … Was it kept’ clean and. Wiis it kept at ever te mper: ature dur ane the Whole time? A.. Yes, it wis ke ‘pt clean and at even temper a=.
Opposition Brief — LAJIM, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. General Electric Company
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jul 22, 2019
clean ups of other contaminated sites in Illinois.’” … Romero-Barcelo, a Clean Water Act case, the Court explained that the “essence of equity jurisdiction has been the power of the Chancellor to do equity and to mould each decree to the necessities of the
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Boeing Co. v. Islamic Republic of Iran
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985
Nor is it a case where the appellant acted promptly to cure its default after discovering that the appeal period had expired. … attention is drawn A-75 to the very fundamental points set forth herebelow:- l1- The [Iranian Air Force is busy preparing its comments on the Memorandum filed on 20 January i984 by Boeing et al
470 U.S. 1053Petition — Berlitz Schools of Languages of America, Inc. v. Bartelt
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans, supra, 431 U.S. at 558. Following United Air Lines, the Court analyzed in Del- aware State College v. … The back pay recovery period in many cases will be longer under the Equal Pay Act than under Title VII.
464 U.S. 915Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Donna A. Black, Petitioner v. Jerome Lindsay
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 9, 2018
evidence that we had that could have been very useful and the last attorneys that went to trial with us excluded ninety nine point nine percent of our evidence that was submitted during our discovery period … year and a month now, suffers from all types of side effects of being lead poisoned, our thirteen year old has to suffer being diagnosed with Asthma from breathing and inhaling Black mold and unhealthy air
Reply Brief — PacifiCorp, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 18, 2025
. § 7607 ................................... 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 21 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. … See Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. No.95-95, § 305(c), 91 Stat. 685, 776 (1977).
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Gahagan Construction Corp. v. Armao
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1948
to a statute which I have not commented on and I don’t want 11 to go into it.’’ … In this case the District Court judge refused to consider or comment upon the Longshoremen’s Act or any phase thereof (R. pp. 186, 187).
333 U.S. 876Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Castorina v. Lykes Bros. Steamship
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985
Some- times the loose asbestos to be cleaned out of the hold would be several inches deep. … Plaintiff assisted cleaning up the IBA that spilled in the hold.
474 U.S. 846Appendix — Bantom v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1964
Of the 96 plaintiffs involved in the suit, 2 were chiefs of police, 8 were captains or acting captains, and 15 were lieutenants or acting lieutenants. … At the roll call each policeman was required to be in full uniform which had to be clean and neatly pressed ; to have his equipment clean and shined; and to be neat in appearance.
379 U.S. 890Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 15, 2022
No. 21-627 In The Supreme Court of the United States AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. d/b/a AIRLINES FOR AMERICA, Petitioner, v. … Bonta, 996 F.3d 644, 656 (9th Cir. 2021) (cleaned up)).
Appendix — Milwaukee v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981
” $ 505(h). 20 Clean Water Act of 1977, P.L. 95-217, 91 Stat. 1566 (to be codified 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq.). … The 1972 Amendments An analysis of the 1972 amendments of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act clearly shows that Congress in no way in- I Similarly, the Supreme Court, in construing the Clean Air
451 U.S. 304Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Nov 30, 2023
And “in a three-month period in 2021, YouTube removed 1.16 billion comments.” Pet. App. 173a; J. A. 133a. … App. 175a (cleaned up).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jorge Madero-Gil, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 30, 2020
Nov. 12, 2019). ice ceecssssseeseessseeseeesrecenessseeseenaeeneeeeesseenseeaes 3-4 Utility Air Regulatory Group v. … Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IRIRA) of 1996, § 309(c)(2), Pub. L.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City of Los Angeles v. Aaron
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1975
Further, the Congress adopted the Airport and Air- way Development Act of 1970, 49 U.S. … The Batten rule has been criticized by most commentators.’
419 U.S. 1122Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 16, 2022
William Hines, History of the 1972 Clean Water Act: The Story Behind How the 1972 Act Became the Capstone on a Decade of Extraordinary Environmental Reform, 4 Geo. Wash. J. Energy & Envtl. … Amici’s ability to protect these waters depends on a correct and broad understanding of the Clean Water Act.
Reply Brief — Jaramillo v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2000
Circuit’s construction of the Clean Air Act, another law of nationwide application that vests exclusive appellate jurisdiction initially in that Circuit. See American Trucking Assns v.
530 U.S. 1274Appendix — O'Bannon v. Town Court Nursing Center
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1980
A thirty (30) day period ending May 4, 1974, was granted to correct existing deficiencies. An offer to provide consultation was included in the ~letter but was not acted upon by Mr. Thomas. … Then the pa- tients should be asked to comment.
447 U.S. 773Opposition Brief — Manigault v. King (No. 09-417)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2009
When an armed suspect charges, the entire scenario will transpire in an incredibly short period of time, as here, and the techniques used to counter the attack must be clean and decisive. … Only Officer King testified that Jelani made a comment, which was either “go ahead and kill me,” or “you're going to have to kill me.”
Transcript of Record — Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1931
In case it is desired to act upon — Po oil. … _ during a reaction period: of 30 minutes.
283 U.S. 163Emergency Application — TikTok Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Dec 16, 2024
(cleaned up). … users outside the United States, where the Act’s prohibitions do not apply, we would need a period of lead time to work closely with our service providers.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.