Documents

Reply Brief — RMS of Georgia, LLC, dba Choice Refrigerants, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 2, 2026

Circuit instead plucked that requirement from Title VI of the Clean Air Act—an entirely different statutory scheme—and grafted it onto the AIM Act, in a transparent attempt to avoid the glaring nondelegation … , not [] an 9 amendment to the Clean Air Act.”

Petition — Spannaus v. Goldschmidt

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

Borden Co., ee Cee A oe, ee ee oes Federal Statutes: cat RRR a ee ice won ere ora _ tt NI ERNE te ears a une EE AIRE Seagiian ce SPER TI tot a SRR ROR CE I MEI ick eg Aken ne nae UN MN sa Ed a EP … . §§ 470-470t (1976), and of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-642 (1976).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Company, Petitioner v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2018

Further, many EWAC members’ facilities on public or private lands require federal approvals such as Clean Water Act (“CWA”) section 404 permits and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) licenses … (EPA wrongly interpreted the word “appropriate” in the Clean Air Act provision as allowing it to ignore costs of pollution controls).

Opposition Brief — McGovern v. Town of Wilton

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992

Traitz identified Burns as “one of my guys’ nephews” and said that Burns needed a “clean bill to get into the army.” … THE COURT [petitioner]: It just seems a shame if he wants to go into the Air Force— MR. NAGEL: I have heen suggesting the Navy, Your Honor. THE COURT: Let me see counsel in the back.

Opposition Brief — Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Murphy

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1966

. | STATEMENT , -Under the Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C. 1301 et seq.), air carriers are prohibited’ from engaging in * “any air transportation unless there is if force ¢ a cer- __-tifieate’-of … rule-making and invited comment from the air car- riers as to revision of the régulations (27 FR. 11322) ; latex, comments were solicited from’ the. carriers on. | specific proposals for the revision

Opposition Brief — Mira Slovak Aerobatics, Inc. v. California State Board of Equalization

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993

Deficiency in sales and use taxes for the period July 1, 1984 to June 30, 1987 of $36,598.32. b. … Defendant failed to act upon Plaintiff’s claim for ~efund within six months, therefore Plaintiff is entitled to .onsider the claim as having been denied. B5 15.

Opposition Brief — Manigault v. King (No. 09-417)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2009

When an armed suspect charges, the entire scenario will transpire in an incredibly short period of time, as here, and the techniques used to counter the attack must be clean and decisive. … Only Officer King testified that Jelani made a comment, which was either “go ahead and kill me,” or “you're going to have to kill me.”

Appendix — Dowell v. Beech Acceptance Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1971

-(U.C.C. , Comment to §9-307.)1 | eo is The trial court adverted to the fact that even a "clean" report on a particular 55 The judgment pore ‘therefore -be affirmed as far as ‘the principal issue … “(See Uniform Commercial Code Comment 2, Com. Code, §9307.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tearney v. Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989

FA Act and FAA orders mandate that APA public notice and comment procedures be followed ...22 II. “Public interest” unconstitutional basis for license penalties ......... 26 A. … FA Act and FAA directives mandate that airsafety rules be promulgated through APA public notice and comment procedures.

Joint Appendix — United States v. SA Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1984

Comment. … Comment.

Transcript of Record — Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Hawn

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1953

Foreman, Roberts Cleaning Supply Company. Q. What do they do? A: Clean ships. Q. How long have you been a ama A. Close to four years. … No, air. . What is right? a | 4s .

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

cleaning up messes, changing diapers, and other ser- vices. … However, activities involving heavy cleaning such as cleaning refrigerators, ovens, trash or garbage removal and cleaning the rest of a ‘trashy’ house would be general household work or nonexempt work

Appendix — Rostker v. Goldberg

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981

Additional comments are in Ap- pendix E. … Comments and recommendations: a.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Foothills Christian Ministries, et al., Petitioners v. Kim Johnson, in Her Official Capacity as Director of the California Department of Social Services, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 5, 2026

CompassCare, 125 F.4th at 54 (cleaned up). 18a Appendix A the Act may be controversial,” the mere “existence and contents of the Act” is “not itself controversial.” Id. at 65 (cleaned up). … See Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 2004). 3.

Reply Brief — Citizens for the Appropriate Placement of Telecommunications Facilities v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001

Ruckelshaus, 486 F.2d 375, 387 (D.C.Cir. 1973): “We add, finally, a word of clarification: we establish a narrow exemption from NEPA, for EPA determinations under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act. … REHABILITATION ACT.

Petitioners Brief — De Bardeleben Coal Co. v. Macomber

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1942

Seaboard Air Line v. Pad- gett, 236 U. S. 668, 673, 35 S. Ct. 481, 59 L. Ed. 777; Chicago, M. & P. Railroad v. Coogan, 271 U. S. 472, 46 S. Ct. 564, 70 L. … (Federal Employ- ers’ Act, 45 U.S. C. A. See. 51-59.)

Opposition Brief — Hammel v. Eau Galle Cheese Factory

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, § 101(8), 42 U.S.C. § 12111(8). … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 900 F. Supp. 493 (S.D.

Jurisdictional Statement — Minnesota, Etc. v. Clifford L. Alexander, Secretary of the Army

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1977

OND... .. .«.-...xcksac une arn Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §1857 (Supp. IV, 1975)... . 18 UGG. 008 ....... . .:.. che eee 2 aS 13 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments 3 C.F.R. ch. … Air Act is virtually identical to §313.

Petition for a writ of mandamus — In Re United States, et al., Petitioners

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a writ of mandamus · Oct 18, 2018

the Clean Water Act. … They are correct that plaintiffs likely could not obtain the relief they seek through citizen suits brought under the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, or other environmental laws.

Supplemental Brief — Mike Moyle, Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives, et al., Applicants v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · Jan 3, 2024

Luminant involved notice of violations sent by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) informing the plaintiff power plant of violations under the Clean Air Act. Id. at 440. … It was the Clean Air Act—not the EPA’s notice of violations to the plaintiff power plant—that set forth the plaintiff’s rights and obligations. Id. at 442.