Documents

Opposition Brief — Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973

The Perry patent covered ‘*nelletized nutshells . . . with the hardness of black walnut shells” ‘‘for use in air blasts for cleaning metal’? … -15, 41-42), without regard to end use or cleaning method.’ 3.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — PrimeSource Building Products, Inc., Petitioner v. United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 21, 2023

(cleaned up). … Air Lines, Inc. v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jackson v. Morgan

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

App. 8a (dismissing the jury’s “comments” as “gratuitous”). … Cobb, 905 F.2d 784, 789 (4° Cir. 1990) (noting that "the unnecessary infliction of continued pain throughout a prolonged time period clearly supports an inference that the guards were acting to punish

Opposition Brief — Volkema v. Michigan

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998

. - -vii- Statutes Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et SG.......cccccessesseseeeeenes 7 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344... cccccccccscsceeseeeneeees 13 Executive Reorganization Order 1995-18, … In addition to these cases, and of particular relevance to the underlying case, are a series of takings cases based on actions taken by the federal government under the Clean Water Act ("CWA"), 33 U.S.C

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board v. Department of Transportation

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000

Garza, Circuit Judge, held that: (1) order was not a substantive rule subject to notice and comment period under Administrative Procedure Act (APA); (2) DOT was not required to grant preclusive effect … It grounds that charge on, among other things, our original decision to give parties two weeks to file comments. As Fort Worth well knows, we later doubled the comment period by Order 98-9-5.

Petition — Spannaus v. Goldschmidt

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

Borden Co., ee Cee A oe, ee ee oes Federal Statutes: cat RRR a ee ice won ere ora _ tt NI ERNE te ears a une EE AIRE Seagiian ce SPER TI tot a SRR ROR CE I MEI ick eg Aken ne nae UN MN sa Ed a EP … . §§ 470-470t (1976), and of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-642 (1976).

Appendix — Land Air Delivery, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1989

Land Air, erroneously stating that the inquiry involved inatters relating to 2 pending case before the Board,' de- clined to comment on the inquiry. On June 22, the union went back on strike. … Air is an employer engaged in commerce within the mean- ing of Section 2(2), (6) and (7) of the Act.

Appendix — Rostker v. Goldberg

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981

Additional comments are in Ap- pendix E. … Comments and recommendations: a.

Respondents Brief — South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2003

The question is whether the operation of this point source constitutes the “addition” of a pollutant within the meaning of “discharge” in the Clean Water Act. … A Legislative History of the Water Pollution Control Act 1. See Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as the Clean Water Act, 86 Stat. 816, as amended, 33 U.S.C.

Appendix — United Air Lines, Inc. v. Mahin

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1973

In other words, 295 aircraft during this period were actually— MR. CAMPBELL: We object to counsel commenting on the exhibit, Your Honor. . THE COURT: Objection will be sustained. … T. and Use Tax Acts? A. Tam Q: For what period has Shell Oil been audited under these acts? A. Our last audit ended as of December 31, 1965. Q.

Supplemental Brief — Mike Moyle, Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives, et al., Petitioners v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · Jan 3, 2024

Luminant involved notice of violations sent by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) informing the plaintiff power plant of violations under the Clean Air Act. Id. at 440. … It was the Clean Air Act—not the EPA’s notice of violations to the plaintiff power plant—that set forth the plaintiff’s rights and obligations. Id. at 442.

Transcript of Record — Silver King Coalition Mines Co. v. Conkling Mining Co.

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1921

Then we would clean out the chutes, clean the eecond class chute out and let it in and clean the chute on top, and send it on top. … air Hanauer.

Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 16, 2019

Print 1973) ........................................................... 17 ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIAL: Nat’l Ass’n of Clean Water Agencies et al., Comment Letter on Clean Water Act Coverage of “Discharges … See Nat’l Ass’n of Clean Water Agencies et al., Comment Letter on Clean Water Act Coverage of “Discharges of Pollutants” via a Direct Hydrologic Connection to 20 Surface Water at 10 & Attachment A (May

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Smith v. Brookshire Brothers, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

The composite vapor pressure of hand- wipe cleaning solvents used in a cleaning operation subject to this subpart shall be determined as follows: (1) For single- component hand- wipe cleaning … Pt. 430, |A reference file of involved inthe |App.A material safety chemical analy- data sheets sis of water and (MSDSs) should be wastewater made available to under Clean all personnel Water Act

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Edgerton Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. General Casualty Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

Act 410. … App. 1991) (citing Comment, Liability of Landowner for Pollution of Percolating Waters, 39 MARQ. L.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Estate of Colon ex rel. Martinez v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997

, and his comments about Kelly’s attire were not work related. … Secretary of the Air Force, 944 F.2d 1477 (9th Cir. 1991), is misplaced.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Callahan v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1971

ite in here, act. to proteng, the security of the entire community. … Callahan had committed himself to the doing of an act in f urtherance of the enterprise.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jonathan Dean Davis, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 27, 2023

Davis had been working in the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (“HVAC”) industry since he was 18 years old. … App. 13 Id. at 708–09 (cleaned up). As Evans shows, because $3.2 million exceeds $366,000 in clean money, Davis’s conviction stands.

Petitioners Brief — City and County of San Francisco, California, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jul 19, 2024

The Clean Water Act ........................................ 7 A. … The Clean Water Act A. Congress passed the CWA because the Nation needed an effective approach to controlling water pollution. Congress enacted the Clean Water Act, Pub.

Respondents Brief — Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1992

In addition, it is permitted to manage PCB’s (poly- chlorinated biphenyls) and CERCLA waste, which en- compasses even a wider range of chemicals under “the Clean Water Act or Air Act.” Id. … a ee eet : : : 4 41 liability the owner or operator of a facility, the gen- erators of the hazardous waste, all other potentially liable persons where clean-up is made necessary due to acts of