Documents

Appendix Vol I — Dvorak v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Appendix Vol I · 2001

USSG § 1B1.3 comment. (n.1). Mr. … A fire which will bur in air will bum explosively in pure oxygen.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

Amici have a vital and endur- ing interest in ensuring that federal administrative agen- cies do not exceed the authority constitutionally dele- gated to them by Congress. 3 STATEMENT The Clean Air … Act (“CAA”) requires the Environ- mental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to promulgate and periodically revise national ambient air quality standards for certain pollutants.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City of Costa Mesa, California, Petitioner v. SoCal Recovery, LLC, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 21, 2023

United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 483 (1999), superseded by statute on other grounds, ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-325, 122 Stat. 3553. … United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 483 (1999), superseded by statute on other grounds, ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tony B. Jobe, Esquire, Petitioner v. National Transportation Safety Board

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 24, 2021

Ct. 2356, 2366 (2019) (cleaned up); see also FBI v. … Cir. 1997) (cleaned up); see also Ryan v. Dep’t of Just., 617 F.2d 781, 789 (D.C.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carlos Amezcua, Petitioner v. Joe A. Lizarraga, Warden, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 22, 2021

’), to assure the acts were committed within the applicable limitation period … ), to assure the acts were committed within the applicable limitation period.”

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Horita v. Kauai Island Utility Cooperative

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010

Plaintiff does not allege that Baldwin ever made any racist or sexist comments. … Defendant argues that Plaintiff complains of no acts of discrimination that fall within the 300-day period.

Opposition Brief — Grand Canyon Trust v. Federal Aviation Administration

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999

The Act further required the FAA, within 90 days, and after notice and comment, to “issue a final plan for the management of air traffic in the air space above the Grand Canyon.” § 3(b)(2), 101 Stat … The FAA received more than 14,000 comments. Jd. at 69,305. 3. On December 31, 1996, the FAA issued the Final Rule.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ricky Davis, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 9, 2019

In Dipentino, the Court considered a constructive amendment challenge to a conviction for violations of the Clean Air Act. Id. at 1093–94. … Air Act.

Petition — Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Depense Council, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

-csssssssseseesseseees 6, 8, 10, 11, 15, 17 Atomic Energy Act of 1954 § 189, 42 U.S.C. § 2239 (1970) 8, 9, 10, 11 Clean Air Act § 307(b) (1), 42 U.S.C, § 1857h-5(b) (1) (1970), | as amended (Supp. … At that point, the majority ordered “procedural devices” on remand in excess of the notice and comment requirements of the Atomic Energy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Aktiebolaget Flymo v. Cody

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972

Phe Board.of Patent Prterferences, in its initial opinion, briefly outlined the Examiner’. find- ings but did not comment on them ‘one way-or the other. … Thus, they form an obstacle to the cleanness ; ; 2 trally of the cover portion 3 there is provided an opening 4, which js surrounded by an axial flange § forming an air inet chamber.

Application — Benjamin Robert Cole, Applicant v. Jim Farris, Warden

Supreme Court brief · Application · Oct 14, 2022

Cole was non-responsive to this comment as well. After yet another period of prolonged silence, while Mr. … Prior to this position at Keesler US Air Force Base, I was employed as a Clinical Psychologist with the US Air Force Europe (USAFE) at Royal Air Force (RAF) Lakenheath, in the United Kingdom from June

Application — Benjamin Robert Cole, Petitioner v. Jim Farris, Warden

Supreme Court brief · Application · Oct 14, 2022

Cole was non-responsive to this comment as well. After yet another period of prolonged silence, while Mr. … Prior to this position at Keesler US Air Force Base, I was employed as a Clinical Psychologist with the US Air Force Europe (USAFE) at Royal Air Force (RAF) Lakenheath, in the United Kingdom from June

Appendix — World Airways, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1968

issued pursuant to said Acts during the period such person controlled or participated in the-con- trol of said air carrier.. … issued pursuant to said Acts during the period such person controlled or participated in - the control of said air carrier.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Thomas v. Outboard Marine Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986

SGSie .. . c. cee. 1G § 221(b), 42 U.S.C. 9631(b) ........... 10 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. ..... 3 Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976, 16 U.S.C. 1801 ef seg. 2.0... cane … Suit was filed in March 1978, seeking mandatory injunctive relief under the Retuse Act, 33 U.S.C. 407, and the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 ef seq., and seeking civil penalties under the Clean Water

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Goad v. Goad

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1984

Further authority to support the procedure selected is found in the Restatement (Second) of Judgements, section 80, Reporter’s Note, Comment a. beginning on page 247: Comment a. … See generally, Comment, The Value of the Distinction Between Direct and Collateral Attacks on Judgement, 66 Yale L.J. 526 (1957). Id. at 249.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Clark v. Southern Oregon Citizens Against Toxic Sprays, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1984

Gribble, 621 F.2d I oR 10 II Statutes and Regulations Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. .............-. … Even EPA’s establishment of health-based restrictions on emissions from motor vehicles or additives to fuel, pursuant to the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., would not be con- trolling on other

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Republican Senatorial Committee, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Election Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 28, 2025

Bellotti, 435 U.S. at 802 (Burger, C.J., concurring) (cleaned up). … Sorrell, 548 U.S. 230, 264 (2006) (Kennedy, J., concurring) (cleaned up).

Opposition Brief — Colon v. Feliciano

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990

Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711, 97 L.Ed. 2d 585 (1987) .. 14 Rosenfeld v. United States, Cee Os. Gee PEP Eee CAE. … Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 at 716, 97 L.Ed.2d 585 at 592 (1987) (emphasized); cited in Jenkins, 105 L.Ed.2d 229 at 239.

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Minnesota

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 21, 2023

Industrial Technology Act). … Water Act meant that “no federal common-law remedy was available”); Illinois v.

Opposition Brief — City of Santa Clarita, California v. Los Angeles County, California (No. 05-1462)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2006

Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1219, 104 S.Ct. 2668, 81 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984) (Involving dispute as to consent decree in multi-party litigation under the Clean Water Act). 26 legal determination.” … Gorsuch, supra, 718 F.2d 1117, 1125-26 (involving dispute as to consent decree in multi-party litigation under the Clean Water Act). @ 7.