Documents

Reply Brief — Apache Corp. v. Moore

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996

A clean, visual and drift inspection involves cleaning the threads with a solvent, visually inspecting the threads to ensure that they have not been damaged di ~ 1g transit, and placing a cylinder through … More- over, the record reflects that, when the well blew out, the wellhead shot straight up into the air. Tr. 2373.

Appendix — Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1980

(b) Miscellaneous comments. … Since this amendment is a rule granting an ex- emption, the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) does not require a 30-day period before the amend- ment becomes effective.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bridgeport Port Authority Authority v. Bridgeport & Port Jefferson Steamboat (No. 09-528)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009

The Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act The Port Authority contends that the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, which added new subsection (b) to the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act … Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”) The Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn. Gen.

Appendix — National Football League v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982

Commission granted liberal time period for initial comments, twice extended time to submit comments and reply comments, accepted and considered a late-filed study and several other untimely filed comments … SHARE is reported separately for each of five time periods, and separately for off-the-air and cable viewers.

Appendix — Salvador v. Lake George Park Commission

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2011

It would review the comments and make a determination. Q. I think I missed a step. … (8) A boat cleaning area that is designed, operated and maintained in such a manner to prevent contamination of the waters of the park shall be provided, or boat cleaning shall be prohibited.

Amicus Brief — Kings County v. Santa Rosa Band of Indians

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1977

In addition, both federal law, Clean Air Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. $§ 1857 et seq., and state law, Cal. … Health and Safety Code $$ 24198 et seq., require the development of air pollu- tion control plans applicable only to specific geographical areas because of air pollution problems specifically related

Opposition Brief — Eastern Pilots Merger Committee v. Continental Airlines, Inc

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002

Unable to reach agreement, the union “filed a griev- ance with the Eastern Air Lines Pilots System Board of Adjustment, the arbitral panel responsible under the RLA [sic: Railway Labor Act] for adjudicating … FLOWE: The pilots’ position has been that the merger, if you will, that was necessary to trigger these rights occurred over a period of time, from. the time that Texas Air acquired Eastern in 1986 and

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carl A. Robertson, Petitioner v. Interactive College of Technology, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 9, 2018

Once Robertson said he "believed that he was decisively underpaid," Petitioner's comments made a valid claim under the "Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act ("LLFPA"), which expands the statutory limitations periods … - (14) with Plaintiff's *annual reviews as written over a three-year period from 2009-2011 Plaintiff sincerely believed that due to the December 2011 comments to his annual review. and what he considered

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Roland Electrical Co. v. Walling

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1946

the period of January 1, 1942, to October 31, 1942, showéd . … cleaned..

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — De Stubner v. United Carbon Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1948

) (3) Petitioner is granted Claim 12 for removing water with conditioned air. (App. Vol. IV, page 1463.) Said air is conditioned by heating it under pressure. … The air is heated. (Id., line 108.) Teegerstrom dries the pellets with heated air under pres- sure. (Opinion, page 744.

Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

VI, el. 22222 3, 23 STATUTES : Federal Power Act, § 27, 16 U.S.C. 8811 passim Flood Control Act, §1, 33 U.S.C. § 701-1 (1952 eT 4 Clean Water Act § 101 (g), 88 U.S.C. § 12851 (c)) 4 § 301(b)(1 … (Army Corps of Engineers may deny Clean Water Act Section 404 permit to FERC licensee), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 816 (1987) ; Uncompahgre Valley Water Users Ass'n v. FERC, 785 F.2d 269 (10th Cir.)

Appendix — McCarthy v. Toussaint (Nos. 86-1587, 86-1588)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1987

of time. 125. \_- Three months of this four-month reduction, Or a reduction based on this ration for any lesser period, shall be based upon forebearance from any act for which the prisoner could … cell, furnished with at least a bed, cot or bunk and a clean, untorn mattress, a clean, untorn blanket, a clean, untorn pillow, a 279.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kenneth Hawkins, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 27, 2022

Ct. 361, 370 (2018)) (cleaned up). 23 Id. (citing Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 831-32 (1985)). 24 Heckler, 470 U.S. at 832-33. 25 Id. at 833. 26 2018 Appropriations Act, 132 Stat. at 1009-10. … (quoting Chaney, 470 U.S. at 832) (cleaned up)).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Murphy v. IRS, 128 S. Ct. 2050 (2008) (No. 07-802)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008

The Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. §2622 (1994); The Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. §300j-9(1) (1994); The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7622 (1994); The Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C … The Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2622 (1994); The Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300j-9(I) (1994); The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7622 (1994); The Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Education, et al., Petitioners v. Myra Brown, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2023

Moreover, the Secretary has “claim[ed] to discover” in the HEROES Act an “unheralded power” to issue a mass cancellation of student loan debt. Util. Air, 573 U.S. at 324. … Air, 573 U.S. at 324). He cannot.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Goodman v. Georgia

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

Goodman has “suffered ‘long periods of deprivation of basic amenities,’ such as ‘showers, baths, adequate venti- lation or heating, recreation, work, medical and MH/MR care, laundry service, cleaning … /MR care, laundry service, cleaning service, and phone service.”

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Douglas County v. Babbitt

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

See, e.g., Pacific Legal Foundation, 657 F.2d at 834 n. 4 (actions under the Clean Air Act are categorically exempt from NEPA); Jones v. … Ruckelshaus, 467 F.2d 349, 359 (3rd Cir. 1972) (Clean | Air Act procedure should be used instead of NEPA), cert. denied, 409 l! U.S. 1125, 93 S.Ct. 937, 35 L.Ed.2d 256 (1973).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Smith v. AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC (No. 08-211)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008

authority under the Coastal Zone Management Act, the Clean Air Act, and the Clean Water Act. … . 1451 et seq.); (2) the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.); or (3) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.).

Petition — King v. Public Service Employees Local Union 572

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

Gemini provides cleaning services for the kitchen at Fort Monroe, Virginia, a federal enclave. … Air Terminal Services, 85 F.Supp. 545, 548 (E.D. Va. 1949); Air Terminal Services, Inc. v. Rentzet et. al., 81 F.Supp. 611 (E.D. Va. 1949); Note, Federal Assimilative Crimes Act, 70 Harv. L.

Petition — Transocean Contractors, Inc. v. Reed

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984

He occasionally did some cleaning of the boat. … In affirming the judgment of the Court of Appeals, this Court made the following comments concerning the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act: This Act, as we have seen, was to provide