Documents

Opposition — S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

VI, Sec. 19 of the Constitution of the Common- Se oe UD view a we eae) 22, 30 Statutes Clean Water Act, Section 311, 33 U.S.C. 1321(F)(5). 26, 28 OCS Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. 1813(b)(3).............05. … Restatement (2nd) of Torts, Sec. 929 (1)(a) Comment B (1979). DeSpirito v.

Opposition Brief, — Kellogg v. Energy Safety Services, Inc. (No. 08-1013)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief, · 2009

Vi at 982) Safety technicians/supervisors, including Kellogg, on occasion, pulled a trailer with a compressed air tank; compressed air tanks are considered a hazardous material by DOT. … The Americans with Disabilities Act as Amended by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 became effective on January 1, 2009.

Opposition — Ward v. Maryland

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

House Report 958 discussing the Federal Aviation Act makes it quite clear that the Act does not preempt state criminal jurisdic- tion over the air space. 1961 U.S. … Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc., 411 U.S. 624, 93 S. Ct. 1854 (1973) found only that the Noise Control Act Amendment to Federa] Aviation Act preempted local control and regulation of airplane noise.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

The trigger mechanism used in Arizona's Citizens Clean Elections Act, Ariz. Rev. … The Citizens Clean Elections Act encourages the development and discussion of new ideas by inviting new voices to engage in the political dialogue in Arizona.

Appendix — Hard v. Civil Aeronautics Board (No. 734)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1957

The impact of the Board’s order, stayed during this court’s review, precludes peti- tioner from serving as an airline captain during the suspension period established by the Board, though he may act … Accordingly, we find a six month suspension shoul: be imposed upon respondent, . sg From its factual premises, that administrative logic is und: -standable and, again we comment on the absence of >

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Luis Fernando Ramirez, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 3, 2020

May 18, 2020) (No. 19-6588) ............................... 4 Utility Air Regulatory Group v. … Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996 § 309(c)(2), Pub.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Saipan ex rel. Guerrero v. United States Department of the Interior

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1975

The initial appointments of appointed members shall be made as follows: two for a period of one year; two for a period of two years; and two for a period of three years. … intentionally or negligently causes or permits any pollutant to be deposited where it is discharged into the water, air or land of the Trust Terri- tory shall, upon order of the Board, clean up such

Transcript of Record — Healy v. Ratta

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1934

for said licenses ; | QO that said plaintiff does not ther efore come into vour honor - . abk’ court with clean hands.: ane 13. … Ratta was sure that the volume of sales from January 1, 1931 to June. 1, 1931 was more than the velume of sales for the same period in 1932.

Reply Brief — Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Roberson

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1991

patently contrary to the Act’s purpose and legislative history. … The Seventh Circuit, in upholding his claim against Old Ben, focussed on the fact that Mitchell was de facto an employee of the coal comp&ny during the period he cleaned railroad cars, finding that

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

liable for the costs of these clean-ups.”). 3 CERCLA provides the President (acting primarily through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), see Exec. … Pt. 300; see also CERCLA § 101(23), (24) and (31), 42 U.S.C. 9601(23), (24) and (31); Clean Water Act of 1977 (CWA) § 311(c) and (d), 33 U.S.C. 1321(c) and (d).

Appendix — Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition v. Browner

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1994

Air Act. … At low loads, higher excess air rates are used to improve fuel air mixing.

Petitioners Brief — Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries, 139 S. Ct. 986 (2019) (No. 17-1104)

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2019

(like air coms rs) that played no role in the steams-quapuision eysteme. Pet. App. 61a; JA 518-19. … Without this requirement, any affirma- tive act serving as a but-for cause of a later injury would subject the actor to liability.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — New York District Council No. 9, International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972

Meanwhile, Strip Clean -had filed charges with the National Labor Rel ations Board on August 15, 1969, that the Unio had violated Sectioris S(b) (4) (i) and (ii) B of the National Labor Relations Act … 10, 1969. z During that period Respondent.

Reply Brief — Richard Estle Carson, III, Petitioner v. Kathryn Hyland, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 28, 2023

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 563 (1986) ......................... 9 Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 563 (1986)). 19 10 10 when class representatives’ special payments greatly exceed what each would receive as ordinary class members, this

Amicus Curiae Briefc — McLoed v. Threlkeld

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Briefc · 1942

Each car is in charge of a cook whose duty it is to cook and serve meals and to keep the car clean. … The petitioner worked as cook at various points in Texas along the line of the road during the period in question.

Petition for Writ and Appendix — Butler v. Federal Aviation Administration

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ and Appendix · 2005

On September 10, 2002, the FAA published a summary of the petition in the Federal Register seeking public comment for a period of 2 weeks. … In the U.S. air transport industry, only six pilots (ages 28, 36, 44, 47, 50 and 52) had fatal heart attacks in the eight-year period immediately preceding enactment of the Federal Aviation Act and

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Texas, et al., Petitioners v. Jerry Black, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 22, 2024

Dep’t of Agric., 779 F.3d 258, 267 (5th Cir. 2015) (cleaned up) (citations omitted); see also Nat’l Env’t Development Ass’n’s Clean Air Project v. EPA, 752 F.3d 999, 1008 (D.C. … Air. Regul. Grp. v.

Petitioners Brief — Permian Basin Area Rate Cases

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1968

_ for past periods for. individual respondents. … . woheen ts of transportation by | ~ aircraft; and (5) The need of ent air carrier for revenue suffi- - cient to enable such air carrier, under honest, economi- cal, and efficient management, to ee

Amicus Curiae Brief — Simpson Paper (Vermont) Co. v. Department of Environmental Conservation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

§ 803(a) (3)... 8 ERI BE I hook cictepencinveenetenseqeoincceccceceses 5 Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251-2623 (1988) IB ince snnancnses rnsnsvernosansentose- 3 NI RII 5. sncnceecercensecsenverecesoeseses … Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — O'COnnOr v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

RECUSAL OF MILITARY JUDGE On the first day of tral, the appellant pled guilty to committing sodomy and numerous indecent acts on_ his stepdaughter over a three-year period. … In addition, while trial defense counsel 15a did not object, he did address these comments in his sentencing argument stressing that while awaiting trial (the period of time covered by the EPR) appellant