Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Anselmi v. Attorney General of the United States (No. 225)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1953

traffic period or make plans to merge or sell any of their routes to other air carriers. … For §2(d) of the Act looks to the sound development of an air transportation system through competition.

Transcript of Record — Healy v. Ratta

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1934

for said licenses ; | QO that said plaintiff does not ther efore come into vour honor - . abk’ court with clean hands.: ane 13. … Ratta was sure that the volume of sales from January 1, 1931 to June. 1, 1931 was more than the velume of sales for the same period in 1932.

Amicus Brief — Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984

No. 870, 86th Cong., lst Sess. 12 (1959). 24 (5) Congress empowered states to impose regulations more stringent than NRC regulations with respect to air emissions of radioactivity in the Clean … Air Act Amendments of 1977. 42 U.S.C

Respondents Brief — Johnson v. United States (No. 07-9)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2007

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 438 U.S. 711 (1987) Rapanos v. United States, 126 S. Ct. 2208 (2006) ... passzm Solid Waste Agency of N. Cook County v. … (Clean Water Act or CWA). The district court held that petitioners’ unpermitted dis- charges into wetlands violated the CWA, see Pet. App.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Virgilio v. City of New York

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

See Air Stabilization Act §&§ 401-09. … —For acts of terrorism committed on or to an air carrier during the 180-day period following the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation may cer- tify that the air carrier was

Amicus Curiae Briefc — McLoed v. Threlkeld

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Briefc · 1942

Each car is in charge of a cook whose duty it is to cook and serve meals and to keep the car clean. … The petitioner worked as cook at various points in Texas along the line of the road during the period in question.

Reply Brief — Arthur Lee Burton, Petitioner v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 7, 2024

Georgia-Pacific settles EPA Clean Air Act claims at Crossett, Ark., facility, will correct alleged violations and pay civil penalties. U.S. … Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/archive/epa/newsreleases/georgia-pacific-settles-epa-clean-air-act-claims-crossett-ark-facility-willcorrect.html 32 Crunden, E.

Transcript of Record — Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. Fontenot

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1936

“State base period” means the period _ of calendar years 1929 to 1933, inclusive. … period.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Campbell v. California

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

or acts sought to be restrained " Fed R. … Unless otherwise specified, time periods begin from the effective date of this Order and "days" means calendar days.

Opposition Brief — 3M Company, et al., Petitioners v. George Amador

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 11, 2022

A1214) (“We conclude that [forced-air warming] does contaminate ultra-clean air ventilation.”). … Product Liability Advisory Council Comment to Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules at 14, 16, 32, 47–48 (Feb. 3, 2022), https://perma.cc/B7PB6WVW; see also, e.g., Washington Legal Foundation Comment to

Record and brief — Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. NLRB

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1987

up whatever there (p. 72) was to be cleaned up. … We cleaned up, first, when we went in. Q. You cleaned up for a while? A. Right. ote 157 Q.

Transcript of Record — Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. Fontenot

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1936

In the case _ of tobacco, the base period shall be the postwar period, August 1919-July 1929. … _(k) “1934” means ‘the period from January 1, 1934 to December 31, 1934. | _,({) The term “State base period” means the period calendar years 1929 to 1933, inclusive.

Appendix B — Cornelio v. National Labor Relations Board (No. 08-134)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix B · 2008

Inter alia, the contract for the relevant period provided: 1. DUTIES. … Later that day, during a cleaning period, employees met with Hermens and Captain Smith in the library.

Opposition — Del-AWARE Unlimited, Inc. v. Baldwin

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984

] Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321 IS saith Gicctascecestearsicchimcbinds 5 National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470 RR SIRI IRE AIRE SS ORR a SN 8 § 110(f), 16 U.S.C. 470h-2(f) _. … The court dismissed petitioners’ claims under the National Historic Preservation Act, and Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the Clean Water Act, and the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation

Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis — William J. Trengove, Jr., Petitioner v. Department of Justice

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis · Feb 11, 2025

Laundry and dry-cleaning $. Medical and dental expenses $. —* £HL as/A $. o s i^A 57 7) & A~A*?'7 T)t^ety'7< A? … MPT:75.000000 T600179 1/8" Maid o' Mist Air Vent Replace Existing In order for a radiator to properly heat up it must first remove the cooler air that is in the radiator.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chapman v. Luna

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985

It does not have any reasonable basis, nor is it designed to further the objectives of cleaning up the air. … Control Act * * * | The provision of any such ordinance shall be consistent with the substantive provisions of the Air Quality Control Act * * *.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., Petitioner v. EVA Airways Corporation

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 17, 2023

Marward Shipping Co., 521 F.3d 122, 128 (2d Cir. 2008) (cleaned up). … the cause of action arose from that act; (3) the act caused injury to a person or property within the state; (4) the defendant A9 expected or should reasonably have expected the act to have consequences

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

whatsoever without any Clean Water Act permit. … Storm Water Management Plan, supra n.6, at Table 3.2-1. 16 be removed from Clean Water Act jurisdiction." Comments by EPA Region II (May 2003), at 26.

Amicus Brief — Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

The numerous regulations (e.g., Clean Air Act and Water Pollution Control Act) provide ample federal control over how surface mining is conducted while stil] protect- ing the environment. … However, the states have no choice but to adopt the federal standards as their own or else hand over total control of surface coal mining to the federal government.4 While the Clean Air Act and the

Petitioners Brief — New York v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1992

EPA vy Brown. 431 US 99 (1977) (per curiam) (reviewing regulations promulgated by ihe EPA under the Clean Air Act imposing affirmative obligations upon several States to adopt a vehicle inspection and … Air Act, 42 USC §§ 7401 [a][3], 7407[a]; Clean Water Act. 33 USC § 1251[b]}), or have made receipt of federal funds contin- gent upon voluntary compliance (e.¢., 23 USC § 154 [regula- tion of travel