Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.16s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Aguilar v. Felton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Supp. 399 ($.D. Ghio), aft’d. ee 409 U.S. 808 (1972)..... Coc ecerrccesececces 8 Wolman v. … Board of Education, 330 U.S. at 21-24 (Jackson, J., dissenting).
473 U.S. 402Brief for Appellant — Schlesinger v. Ballard
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellant · 1975
Shevin, No. 73-78, decided April 24, 1974 * 7, 8 Lichter v. United States, 334 US. 742. 9 Miskunas v. Union Carbide Corp., 399 F. 2d 847, certiorari denied, 393 U.S. oo 1066 9 Moritz v. … Shevin, No. 73-78, decided April 24, 1974.
419 U.S. 498Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Steven A. Taliani, Petitioner v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 16, 2022
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 106 S. Ct. 2595 (1986). … (Appendix D, pg. 8, It was here 24).
Reply Brief Petitioner — Stewart v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief Petitioner · 1942
Thompson (1861),48 Cal. 11....... ae: | - United States, Causey v. (1916), 240 U.S. 399.........- 12 . United’ States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co. … United Staley (1917). 245 US. 24, upon which the Government also relies (Govt.
316 U.S. 354Amicus Curiae Brief — James K. Kahler, Petitioner v. Kansas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 3, 2019
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ................ 14 Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930 (2007) ........... 14 Constitution and Statutes: U.S. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 407-11 (1986); see also Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862, 869-76 (D.C.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden, Petitioner v. Patrick Dwayne Murphy
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 9, 2018
United States, 24 Ind. Cl. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 421 (1994).
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 14, 2019
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 399, ET AL., Respondents. … The plaintiffs-appellants and crossappellees below were respondents International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 399, AFL-CIO; International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO, Construction
Reply Brief for the United States — United States v. Northern Pacific R. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief for the United States · 1940
. ° . a Se 399; Utah Power & Light Co.‘v. United States, I 243 vw S. 389; and United States v. San Francisco, — * 310 U. … United: States, 240 U: 8, 399. . One who defrauds the public does so at his peril. | 2. The company states (N.
311 U.S. 317Amicus Curiae Brief — Gibson v. Head
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
See Giarratano, 492 U.S. at 24 (Stevens, J., dissenting). … Giarratano, 492 U.S. at 24 (Stevens, J., dissenting).
528 U.S. 946Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Bittner v. Nebraska
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1972
See Appendix ‘‘B-1’’ infra p. 24. … W. 2d 399, cert. den., 371 U. S. 967, 83 S. Ct. 549, 9 L.
409 U.S. 875Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Edward George McGregor, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 25, 2019
Brown, 399 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc) ........................................................................14 Hinton v. … His mother and brother testified that he was home that night (18 R.R. 122-24; 19 R.R. 10-14).
Opposition Brief — Francisco Javier Palillero, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jul 28, 2021
Id. at 24. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 84-86 13 (1970), and to comply with rape-shield rules, Michigan v. Lucas, 500 U.S. 145, 149 (1991). b.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Woojin Cho, Petitioner v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 20, 2024
California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967). … California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alfred Bourgeois, Petitioner v. T. J. Watson, Warden, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 3, 2020
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 406–08 (1986). … Blackstone, Commentaries *24–25). 3 The common law also prohibited the execution of pregnant women. See, e.g., 4 W.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 27, 2026
Sony Music Entertainment, No. 24-171, 607 U.S. __, slip op. (Mar. 25, 2026) ......... 4, 15 Dawson Chem. Co. v. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 405, 406 (2012) (emphasis added).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2025
Nos. 24-109, 24-110 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF LOUISIANA, Appellant, v. PHILLIP CALLAIS, et al., Appellees. PRESS ROBINSON, et al., Appellants, v. … Appellees (Br. 38) and Louisiana (Br. 18-24) contend that the same is true of Section 2. They are wrong; Section 2 contravenes neither commandment.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 30, 2025
Akins, 524 U.S. at 24. … Id. at 24−25.
Jurisdictional Statement — Hodgson v. Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1971
Sinai Hosp. 111 (1954) 0. 24 Hall, Abortion in American Hospitals, 57 Am. J. Pub. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966) (1860 stat- ute). 3° NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415, 488 (1963). * Griswold v.
402 U.S. 968Reply Brief — Lodi Truck Service, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1986
displaced states’ power over safety of operation employees of inter- Pe ee a 8 6 6 cbs ace kasd cee ce be ceeensann Cases cited by appellee are not directly related or applicable to the issue herein S28 24 … 1973 Cah abcd kd awk Gx 42 © 8 Motor Carrier Act of 1935 (49 Stat. 543) (MCA)...... 2 Seamen’s Act (38 Stat. 1164, 1169, 1170-1184) ........ 2 Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, section 350-399
479 U.S. 801Reply Brief Petitioner — National Labor Relations Board v. Bradford Dyeing Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief Petitioner · 1940
IV, Title 24, See. 151 et seq.): Section 9 ® . … Natiorval Bituniinous Coal Commission, 99° (2d) 399, 406 (App. D. C.). . omental J 4 \, offered hy the Cc.
310 U.S. 318
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.