Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.01s
Joint Appendix — Hallstrom v. Tillamook County
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1989
See comments of Senators Muskie and Hart, 116 Cong. Rec. at 33,103-33,104 (1970). … Cir.1974) (construing amendments to the Clean Air Act). | agree. One of the purposes of the 60-day notice requirement is to allow the EPA to enforce the statute.
489 U.S. 1077Prologue — Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United States Department of Energy
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 1993
In Mobil I, TECA sus- tained Mobil’s contention that the 1974 amendment was invalid because DOE had failed to provide a period of notice and comment. … any later period.
507 U.S. 910Appendix — Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1978
Systems — Ventilation, air cleaning, waste treat- ment, safety instrumentation and monitoring systems are analyzed for suitability under normal and ab- normal conditions. … cleaning, waste treatment, safety in.
435 U.S. 519Appendix — Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984
We believe that our previous comments regarding the experimental nature of the service answer SP’s comments. … United Air Lines, Inc. v.
466 U.S. 933Opposition — OIL, CHEMICAL & ATOMIC WORKERS UNION v. DUNLOP (No. 74-1443)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1974
Written comments wereinvited. … The 400 air contaminant standards had originally been issued under the Walsh-Healey Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 35-45.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Escobedo v. Conoco, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000
Comply with the provisions of Exhibit “B,” concerning the regulation of petroleum products pursu- ant to the Clean Air Act, as revised from time to time. H. … F.Comply with the provisions of Exhibit “B,” con- cerning the regulation of petroleum products pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as revised from time to time. — A-63 — G.
531 U.S. 874Transcript of Record — Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. Fontenot
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1936
In the case of tobacco, the base period shall be the postwar, period, August 1919-July 1929.. (2). … (1) The term “State base period” means the period of calendar years 1929 to 1933, inclusive.
297 U.S. 110Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 16, 2024
Dep’t of Agric., 779 F.3d 258, 267 (5th Cir. 2015) (cleaned up) (citations 16a omitted); see also Nat’l Env’t Developmental Ass’n’s Clean Air Project v. EPA, 752 F.3d 999, 1008 (D.C. … Air. Regul. Grp. v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pacifica Foundation v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
However, ACT I struck down the contraction of the safe harbor period to midnight through 6 a.m. as unjustified by the record. Id. at 1384. … See Broadcasters Comments at 11; Infinity Comments at 2 (citing ACT I, 852 F.2d at 1343); see also 1990 Report, $5 FCC Red at 5299, $310 n. 16, and comments cited therein.
516 U.S. 1043Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 2, 2025
Id. at 438 (cleaned up). … Id. at 210 (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 15, 2019
There is an unbearable stench in the air; 3 A statement verifying this fact was made in open court during oral argument. 5 there are no adequate clean up and containment measures; streets are illegally … Many die before they even reach the slaughter period.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
Bleicher, Economic and Technical Feasibility in Clean Air Act Enforcement Against Stationary Sources, 89 Harv. L.. … Bleicher, Economic and Technical Feasibility in Clean Air Act Enforcement Against Stationary Sources, 89 Harv. L.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1999
Air v Conroy, No. 96 Civ. 4404 (S.D.N.Y.) ........0csscccccssseasssseeed Willowbrook, IL v Olech, No. 98-1288 ............00000.. 8 FEDERAL STATUTES employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 … Ariz.); South Bronx Coalition for Clean Air vV Conroy, No. 98 Civ. 4404 (S.D.N-Y.): New York City Environmental Justice Alliance v Guiliani, No. 99 Civ. 3330 (S.D.N.Y.): Cureton v National Collegiate
528 U.S. 1046Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 10, 2020
The Clean Water Act establishes a procedure for states to follow to administer a state program to enforce the Clean Water Act. 33 U.S.C. §1344 (g)(1). … The Clean Water Act is also a supreme law of the land.
Transcript of Record — Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. Fontenot
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1936
In the case of tobacco, the base period shall be the postwar period, August 1919-July 1929. … . | (1) The term “State Sai period” means the period _ of calendar years 1929 to 1933, inclusive.
297 U.S. 110Petitioners Brief — Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1984
The repeal was completely unrelated to the Convention and, as the Senate commented, 22 Par Value Modification Act of 1972, Pub. L. … the Govenor-General) as amended by Carriage by Air Amendment Act, No. 5 of 1964 Carriage by Air Amendment Act, No. 81 of 1979 Stat.
466 U.S. 243Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. Barker
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1956
Inst., Rest. of Conflicts § 595, Comment c; Peterson v. … Lastly take the case where manu- facturers supplied a special cleaning fluid called **pluper- fect liquid“ for cleaning ships.
350 U.S. 988Reply Brief — Schudel v. General Electric Co.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1998
Consider for example the regulation of two of the scores of chemicals at the clean-up. … Sodium hydroxide limits are 2 mg per cubic meter of air. § 1910.1000 Table Z-1.
523 U.S. 1094Joint Appendix Vol II — Clark v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix Vol II · 2006
I'd be breathing the air and it did not seem clean, so I thought aliens were trying to kill me a lot. A. This is in my report or in the interview notes? 199 Q. … I'd be breath- ing the air and it did not seem clean, so I thought the aliens were trying to kill me a lot. Do you see that? A.
548 U.S. 735Transcript of Record — Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1934
Kind Draft Gear B New Shop Air-Repacked rule 66—Air cleaned ayd tested, Defect P cup ; Air new shop—ioose sil Air cleaned and tested Air—Triple changed and _ tested Defect triple 1—11” x … Kind Air cleaned and tested.
291 U.S. 205
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.