Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

1.60s

  • Motion — Sharon Steel Corp. v. City of Fairmont

    Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1986

    except to say that ia 1979 Sharon permanently ceased opera- tions in the City of Fairmont as the result of a consent decree arising from a complaint filed by the United States for viola- tion of the Clean … Air Act.'

    474 U.S. 1098
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Combined Management, Inc. v. Atchinson

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

    Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. at 108-110. III. … (A) Oral examination including prophylaxis (cleaning of the teeth), limited to once in a period of 6 months. 107a (B) Bite-wing x-rays, limited to once in a period of 6 months.

    513 U.S. 943
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Winston-Salem Industries for the Blind, Petitioner v. PDS Consultants, Inc., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 10, 2019

    and electrical equipment and supplies; clothing, textiles, and individual equipment; food products and packaging; medical and dental supplies and equipment; office supplies, equipment, and furnishings; cleaning … In contrast, during the same period, only 27% of the general working-age population was not in the labor force.

  • Transcript of Record — Wood v. Gas Service Co. (No. 501)

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1957

    Returned - slhues ms aa Court’s Comments After. Verdicts - as Notice ‘of: Appeal to the oe States Court of Appeals for. … After. the war, I have been act-- .

  • Record and brief — Summers v. Earth Island Institute

    Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2009

    EPA, 966 F.2d 1292, 1304 (9th Cir, 1992) (vacating a wa Clean Water Act rule); Asarco v. EPA, 616 F.2d 1153, 1162 (9th Cir. 1980) (vacating a Clean Air Act rule). … Act, 106 Stat. 1419 (1992), 4 I elie 2 Clean Air Act § 307(b), 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)............... 30 Endangered Species Act § 11(g), 16 U.S.C.

    555 U.S. 488
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Nagel Rice, LLP, et al., Petitioners v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 29, 2019

    Hughes Air W., Inc., 557 F.2d 759, 769 (9th Cir. 1977). … (Ryder), benefited the class by “provid[ing] the Court with comments in relation to the proposed settlement.”

  • Opposition Brief — Town of Rye v. Skinner

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

    The documents were the subject of intensive public scrutiny and evaluation, including a public hearing and extended comment period. … A public hearing was conducted on the Draft EA/EIS and an extensive public comment period was afforded to all who wished to participate.

    498 U.S. 1024
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Boynton v. Western Wyoming Community College (No. 05-1554)

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

    She was criticized for not cleaning "mouse droppings" from Ms. Huebner's uncleared desk; while Mr. Bussart had specifically directed her not to clean desks that have not been cleared. … She also complained that he also watched her while she was performing cleaning tasks a couple of times, but did not allege he had made any sexually suggestive comments or touched her. 14a President

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — American Hospital Association, et al., Petitioners v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 10, 2021

    The Clean Air Act directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate emissions of hazardous air pollutants from power plants if EPA finds regulation “appropriate and necessary.” 42 U.S.C. § … For example, one of three “[r]equired elements” of annual rulemaking (where EPA had to determine a given year’s “renewable fuel obligation” under the Clean Air Act’s Renewable Fuel Standard program) was

  • Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Vokes v. City of Chicago

    Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1964

    sccesevnercuces 2 Municipal Code of Chicago, chapters 28, 28.1, 195A, 195A-1 (1939, as amended) .......... > s % Miscellaneous : Se CE cb oh ona eee nceee eens uraGn os 6 Fe EE hank caakauny os clean … the municipality, but the ordinance was inapplicable to ‘‘operators ov drivers of automobiles who are actual and bona fide residents of the city * * * and who have resided therein for a continuous period

    377 U.S. 124
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — McNab v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

    A common example illustrates the point: Consider, the crime ot “knowingly filing a false monitoring report” under the Clean Water Act. … Weitzenhoff, 35 F.3d 1275 (9th Cir. 1994) (felony violation of Clean Water Act—no knowledge of regulations necessary).’

    540 U.S. 1177
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Employers Insurance v. Browner

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

    , (2) sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, (3) sections 1445 and 1431 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, (4) sections 113, 114, and 303 of the Clean Air Act, and (5) section … App. 73 (ii) A reasonable opportunity to comment and provide information regarding the plan.

    516 U.S. 1042
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Roberto Corral, Petitioner v. Arrow Electronics, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 19, 2025

    Specifically, he states that he requested to Steven Vogel, Manager of HR, and D’ Alessandro that he get: • • • Clean air Reduce the number of work alerts he received at night which disrupted his sleep … He requested (i) clean air; (2) to reduce the number of work alerts he received at night to minimize sleep disruption; and (3) to allow one to two hours to alleviate acid reflux, sinus, and asthma symptoms

  • Opposition Brief — Janik v. AMICA Mutual Insurance

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

    After taking air samples, Upah warned Janik that the house was unsafe causing Janik to become frightened for the health of his family (T. Vol. Ic, 60). … Plaintiffs did not bring any motions to compel against Amica during the entire eighteen-month discovery period (Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “B” to Amica’s Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from

    534 U.S. 817
  • Joint Appendix — Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC

    Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1997

    As a result of these efforts, 1188 public television stations experienced relatively few drops or shifts in the 1990 to 1992 period. EXPERIENCE SINCE THE 1992 CABLE ACT 33. … Local tion Act of 1989” at 79-81: tion Act « CR VOL. IH, EXH. 14, CR 610.

    520 U.S. 180
  • Brief for the United States — Maryland Ex Rel. Levin v. United States (No. 345)

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1964

    See Restatement, Judgments, § 93(h), comment d. … , during such period.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — David R. Watkins, et al., Petitioners v. Brian F. Spector, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 27, 2021

    App.45a (cleaned up). … Id. at 251 (cleaned up).

  • Appendix — Porter v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1999

    SAE EN birt SE ME RR ces SD The Air Board must act on an offiwer's petition for correction. … The comments on the contested LOE are similar to the comments on the contested OER closing 2 January 1984 which the Board found to be in error.

    528 U.S. 809
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 17, 2022

    It held unanimously that the climate claims there sounded in the federal common law and that Congress displaced any such claims when it enacted the Clean Air Act. See id. at 424. … Second, and only then, did the Court hold Congress displaced through the Clean Air Act remedies that might be granted under federal common law. See AEP, 564 U.S. at 425.

  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — United Aircraft Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1964

    The collective agreement had no union -seeurity provision (J.A. 96; 102). 2 International Union, United Automobile, Aire raft, and Agri- cultural Liplement Worker-, APL-C1O. … The Union also isssed three other leaflets, a prepared by Chamberlain, juring this period.

    376 U.S. 951

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.