Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.55s
Reply Brief — Federal Communications Commission v. Brand X Internet Services
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2005
Air Act—an issue on which the EPA itself had adopted varying positions over time. … Thus, in Chev- ron itself, the EPA was entitled to deference when it deter- mined that a group of multiple pollution-emitting devices constitutes a single “stationary source” under the Clean Air Act
543 U.S. 1185Petition — Agrillo-Ladlad v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982
the proper amount of fuel to air is attained.’’ … L. 287 (1979); Comment, The Impact of Fed- eral Rule of Evidence 104 on the Conconspirator Ex- 2 to the Hearsay Rule, 28 Emory L.
459 U.S. 829Reply Brief — Jody Lombardo, et al., Petitioners v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 30, 2023
The other cases, they say (at 2-3), “each involved force exerted on a prone subject for sustained periods after the subject was completely subdued and was no longer a threat,” whereas Gilbert “resisted … Rickard, 572 U.S. 765, 774 (2014) (cleaned up). Were the Court to do so, it could also address one or more related questions of broader importance. Like: What constitutes deadly force?
Record P718773 — King v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Record P718773 · 1953
What comments, if any, have you to make with Te- spect .to this exhibit? A. … What comments have ‘you to make with respect to: this exhibit? “A.
344 U.S. 254Reply Brief — Anderson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1998
Air Act. … Finally, the government argues the Equal Access to Justice Act "specifically excludes ’cases sounding in tort?
523 U.S. 1072Amicus Curiae Brief — Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
service agency, such as the defendant corporate provider in that case). 13 upheld a regulation of the Environmental Protection Agency, on the ground that it was a_ permissible construction of the Clean … Air Act.
551 U.S. 158Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Oct 18, 2021
But HHS did not acknowledge that to be its policy until a few days before closing the final comment period. … Ct. at 2126 (cleaned up).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arnold v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
Plaintiff checked the air equipment, automatic brake, independent brake, deadman pedal, cab sink shell, windshield wipers, the boiler, governor, headlights and brakes. … There was also evidence that conveyor belts would “eventually” become clogged if not periodically cleaned. Id.
502 U.S. 939Opposition Brief — Jordan v. Valdez
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
Linde Air Prods. … The plaintiff sued defendants for backpay and reinstatement alleging a violation of the Veteran’s Reemployment Rights Act (“VRRA” or “the Act”), 38 U.S.C. § 4301 et seg.
519 U.S. 976Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 20, 2020
Q Do you consider marijuana smoke to be clean? A No. Q Do you consider cigarette smoke to be clean? … “safe” means “free from danger” and “clean” means “free from pollution.”
Petition — Distler v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
The portion exposed to the air volatilizes, emitting a distinctive odor, and in some in- stances, a haze. … The Admin- istrator shall allow a period of not less than sixty days following publication of any such proposed effluent standard (or prohibition) for written comment by in- terested persons on such
454 U.S. 827Transcript of Record — United States v. Barlow
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1902
Th: Honorable the ( hie Justice and Judges of the ( ourt of ( Vaims: Pursuant to the provisions of section 2 of the act of March 3, 1883 (22 Stat., 485—the Bowman Act), and as requested by the Comptroller … neer, All stone must be hard, clean, and free from seams and imperfec. tions, and of good bed and build.’
184 U.S. 123Motion — Sharon Steel Corp. v. City of Fairmont
Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1986
except to say that ia 1979 Sharon permanently ceased opera- tions in the City of Fairmont as the result of a consent decree arising from a complaint filed by the United States for viola- tion of the Clean … Air Act.'
474 U.S. 1098Appendix — Bongiovanni v. San Filippo
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1995
Xiao, you clean this.” He led me to the front of the house. He said, “Clean the door and the windows,” and finally he pointed to, “Clean the porch.” … Filippo assigned me to clean the windows, door and porch. I cleaned his windows and door. When I was cleaning the porch the ladder whose rung I was standing on slid down.
513 U.S. 1082Petition — Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. McBride
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
Delta Air Lines 15 over a period of years and has no doubt already subjected Delta to considerable expense. … shall be extended to one hundred and twenty days during the first year after the effective day of such State or local law), unless a shorter period is requested, to act under such State or local law
434 U.S. 916Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Roach v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
The sentence is imposed Ce pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. … Elizabeth Roach embezzled more than $240,000 from her employer over a three-year period.
543 U.S. 1180Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 18, 2021
Why are all Respondents hiding this US Resource when Viruses travel in Water Supply as much as the air during a National Coronavirus Pandemic? … Who are these crazy US Judges and courtrooms who hide clean water, jobs and more for Politicians and Terrorist? This is US TREASON by Judges!
Amicus Curiae Brief — Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
In Boraas, “quality of life" was said to take into account family values, youth values, the blessing of quiet seclusion and clean air. … In 1976 the City of Seattle amended its zoning code following a long period of study and discussion of the problems of adult movie theatres in its residential areas.
475 U.S. 41Respondents Brief — Atlantic Richfield Company, Petitioner v. Gregory A. Christian, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Oct 15, 2019
[15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.], the Safe Drinking Water Act [42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.], the Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.], the Clean Water Act [33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.], the Marine Protection, Research … The notice shall identify the facility concerned and the parties to the proposed settlement. (2) Comment period For a 30-day period beginning on the date of publication of notice under paragraph (1) of
Appendix — Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983
of 1966 as amended (the Safety Act). … According to some estimates, it is equivalent to repealing the Clean Air Act.” /s/ William D. Nordhaus WILLIAM D.
463 U.S. 29
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.