Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.43s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Lamont Coleman, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 18, 2025
United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965) ..................................................7 Southern Union Co. v. … United States, 380 U.S. 24, 31 (1965); see also Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970); Batson v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 21, 2025
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) .............. 6, 9, 12 Eli Lilly & Co. v. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 405 (2012); see Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc., 496 U.S. 661, 676 (1990).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Damar D. Ruffin, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 30, 2025
United States, No. 24-5438. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409-410, 106 S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 30, 2026
United States, 567 U.S. 387, 399-400 (2012) (quoting Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52, 67 (1941)). … Arizona, 567 U.S. at 399-400 (quoting Hines, 312 U.S. at 67).
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
Mississippi State Building Commission, 399 So. 2d eee ee 17, 19 Coastal Sales Marketing, Inc. v. Hunt, ab caw axes se 8 oe 10 Crews v. Pertrosky, 509 F. … Mississippi State Building Commission, 399 So. 2d 1352 (Miss. 1981); see also Mississippi State Department of Public Welfare v.
502 U.S. 817Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Combined Insurance Co. of America v. Ainsworth
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
Instruction No. 24, App. 188a; see Nev. Rev. Stat. § 42.010 (1988). App. 200a. … Flanigan Warehouse Co., 79 Nev. 241, 248, 382 P.2d 399, 403 (1963) (dictum); accord Browning-Ferris, 109 S.
493 U.S. 958Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hughes v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998
Green, 399 U.S. at 161; Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. at 89. See also Ecker v. … Greene, 399 U.S. 149, 157-58 (1970).
523 U.S. 1006Amicus Brief — United States v. Nobles
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1969). … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 85, (1970).
422 U.S. 225Respondents Brief — Johnny Johnson, Petitioner v. David Vandergriff, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Aug 1, 2023
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). 2 Panetti v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 426 (1986) (Powell, J, concurring). In Panetti v.
motion to dismiss — Corbitt v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · motion to dismiss · 1978
.:..ececcccsvssesesanessseres 24, 26 State v. Williams, 39 N.J. 471, 189 A.2d 193 (1963), oort, Gam, BIG Wis. GED CED ccccsaccnassascssvisnsncehensicnits 24 TABLE OF VONTENTS Vv PAGE Thomas v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 83 (1970).
439 U.S. 212Opposition Brief — Bell v. Thompson
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010
See Docket 00-5516, 5/24/00 Application for a COA. 3. … appeals recognized, “[t)he evidence Thompson submitted was undoubtedly a Thus, evenif Van Tran is an appropriate application of ford, the Tennessee Supreme Court failed to apply it correctly here 24
562 U.S. 831Brief for the United States — United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1974
= oe 24 It was not legally barred by Washington law from entering Spokane. … Phillipsburg National Bank, 399 U.S. 350, 371.
418 U.S. 602Appellees Brief — League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 2005
Ex. 141 (Gaddie expert report) at 3, 19, 24. 33 was reasonable); Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropoli- tan Housing Dev. … Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (19664)............ 14, 21, 22, 24 Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore v.
546 U.S. 1074Appendix — DuBois v. City of College Park
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983
Mundt, 403 U.S. 182, 91 S.Ct. 1904, 29 L.Ed.2d 399 (1971); Hadley v. Junior College District, 397 U.S. 50 90 S.Ct. 791, 25 L.Ed.2d 45 (1970); Avery v. … Mundt, 403 U.S. 182, 91 S.Ct. 1904, 29 L.Ed.2d 399 (1971); Hadley v.
459 U.S. 1146Amicus Curiae Brief — DeFunis v. Odegaard
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
(St. 423-24.) … Titus, 431 F. 24 1254 (3d Cir., 1970); Carter v.
416 U.S. 312Supplemental Brief — Rummler v. California
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1975
App.3d TTT ccsicctsesitmciiieniteneiscctiiataataaimaapaiitaiatiiaa iaiaaitaaitaililatl 24 Seusteen v. … By inference it also rejected the doctrine of Williams v Florida (1970) 399 U.S. 78 wherein this Court with the exception of Mr.
423 U.S. 804Petition — Alarshi v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Wixon, 326 US 135 (1945) 200... 24, 26 Bruten v. US., 391 US 123 (1968) —.......................... 16,18 California v. Green, 399 US 149 (1970) —..0..... 18, 19 Chambers v. … — 19 the declarant. (399 U.S. at 161, 162; emphasis sup- plied; ft.nt. omtd.)?7 Next came Dutton. In Dutton v.
439 U.S. 912Amicus Curiae Brief — Grutter v. Bollinger
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Jackson Bd. of Educ., 476 U.S. 267, ee 24, 26 Vick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886) ...cscc-.. 15,17 OTHER AUTHORITIES James E. … Rev. 379, 385-399 (1979); Nathan Glazer, Diversity Dilemma, The New Republic, June22, 1998, at http://www.tnr.com/ archive/0698/062298/glazer062298. html.
539 U.S. 306Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Coston Supply Co. v. Pabellon
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1951
t t *. 4e FILED OCT 24 1951] Supreme Court uf the Anite States ee OCTOBER TERM, 1951 CHARLES ELMURc crores oe 399 ALEJANDRO sides: Damien: basis Plaintiff- Respondent, against Grace Live Inc., … Local Law is in Conflict With the Opinion Below 24 D.
342 U.S. 893Brief for Respondent — Supt. of Insurance v. Bankers Life & Cas. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1971
Roto American Corporation, : 339 F.2d 24 (2d Cir. 1964) ... ara ceeroepeeetase aes nesrereres “19 Schoenbaum v. … ‘denied, 399 U.S. 909 (1970); Mutual Shares Cérporation v. Genesco, Inc., 384 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1967).
404 U.S. 6
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.