Documents

Opposition Brief — Kennedy v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996

KEENEY Acting Assistant Attorney General WILLIAM C. … KEENEY Acting Assistant Attorney General WILLIAM C. BROWN | Attorney FEBRUARY 1996

Respondents Brief — Davis v. Green

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1922

During that period we enjoyed a camp and we kept our extra equipment here for emergencies which would arise from time to time. Q. … The Petitioner Pleaded Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Burden was on It to Prove Act Applied. No Such Proof was Made, Therefore Act Does Not Apply.

Opinion — Hebe Co. v. Shaw

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1919

for purposes to which condensed milk is applied and states of what Hebe is made, it more than half recognizes the plain fact that Hebe is nothing but con- densed milk of a cheaper sort. . _ . - : . aire … It is shown to be wholesome and clean and free from impurities. It seems to us that the case is within the principle stated by this court in Hutchinson Ice Cream Company v. Iowa, 242 U.

Opposition Brief — Schoenborn v. Boeing Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987

Those particles had been introduced into the transmission when it was cleaned and overhauled at the Corpus Christi Army Depot. … Under the West German Air Traffic Law, the U.S.

Petition — Texas Industrial Accident Board v. Industrial Foundation of the South

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977

Like Department of Air Force v. … come with clean hands

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Saria Walker, Petitioner v. Scientific Alloys Corp., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 8, 2023

Federal Trade Commission Act fiR U.S.C. § 41-58) • Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1120) • Fair Packaging and Labeling Act fi.R U.S.C. §§ 1451-1461) . … .* Mercury can vaporize (evaporate) into the air.

Reply Brief — National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2005

Air Act—an issue on which the EPA itself had adopted varying positions over time. … Thus, in Chev- ron itself, the EPA was entitled to deference when it deter- mined that a group of multiple pollution-emitting devices constitutes a single “stationary source” under the Clean Air Act

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Phyllis Davis, Petitioner v. Echo Valley Condominium Association, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 20, 2020

Q Do you consider marijuana smoke to be clean? A No. Q Do you consider cigarette smoke to be clean? … “safe” means “free from danger” and “clean” means “free from pollution.”

Opposition — Board of Supervisors v. Coleman

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976

reading of the history of the Noise Control Act in- dicates that Senator Tunney’s remarks were an apparent attempt to make law via ‘‘legislative history’’ shortly after the substance of his comment … Finally, the petitioners’ comment that they ‘‘are without redress”? in regard to the absence of an SST noise rule is fallacious.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Albers v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001

For the purposes of this subparagraph, “deliv- ery” means the act of conveying or releas- ing persons or property. … Al6 Clean-up/take-down to be completed by 3:30 PM. Approximately 400 participants. PLEASE NOTE THE ATTACHED SPECIAL CONDI- TIONS ARE A PART OF THIS PERMIT.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

§ 1311(a) Clean Water Act § 402(p), 33 U.S.C. § 1342(p) Clean Water Act § 502(7) 33 U.S.C. § 1362(7) Clean Water Act § 502(12), 33 U.S.C. … (See Clean Water Act § 402(p), 33 U.S.C. § 1342(p).)

Amicus Curiae Brief — Green v. Donahoe, 135 S. Ct. 1892 (2015) (No. 14-613)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

In 1989, the EEOC invited comment on whether the time period should be lengthened. 54 Fed. Reg. 45,747, 45,749 (Oct. 31, 1989). … The comment period ended in April 2015.

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Minnesota

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 21, 2023

It held unanimously that the climate claims there sounded in the federal common law and that Congress displaced any such claims when it enacted the Clean Air Act. See id. at 424. … Air Act.

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Aiuppa v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1971

He - ( further testified that he cleaned somewhere between 900 and 1400 doves. … An- drew Williams téstified that during approximately a twoe week period he cleaned between nine and fourteen hundred mourning or turtle doves and placed them in plastic bags for various hunters, including

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jeffrey Andrews, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 20, 2025

Andrews”), alleging violations of sections 301 and 308 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). See 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311, 1319. In particular, the Government asserts that Mr. … Andrews is entitled to compensation has no bearing on the claims in this case that he violated the Clean Water Act.” Ruling on Motions to Dismiss at 8 (Doc. No. 200).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al., Petitioners v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2024

III, § 321(a)(3)(B), 137 Stat. 10, 38 (Builder Act). … Joint Comments at 9; cf.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mumaw v. Nurad, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

§ 9607(b) sets forth the following defenses to Section 107 liability: where the release or threatened release of a hazardous substance was caused by: 1) an act of God; 2) an act of war; 3) an act … Dec. 5, 1985) (comments of Representative Eckhart, primary sponsor of 1986 amendments) (emphasis added) quoted by United States v. Western Processing Co., 734 F. Supp. at 939.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Joslyn Manufacturing Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

submit an approved clean-up plan for the site. … clean-up plan for the site.

Appendix Vol2 — Tennessee v. Dja Vu of Nashville, Inc. (No. 05-1194)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix Vol2 · 2005

Some of those items were: Repair hand sink; clean walls and all air condition- ing vents; clean storage areas; provide hand towels. … SCHAFFNER: ... report, which includes a need for repairing hand sink for the ease of cleaning; thoroughly cleaning the walls in booths and air condition- ing vents in the hall; providing a minimum of

Respondents Brief — AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Nov 30, 2020

Equity commentators universally recognized this principle. … Ctr., 568 U.S. 145, 156 (2013) (cleaned up).