Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.37s
Petition — Block v. Rutherford
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
Methods B and D are so unsatisfactory and expensive that no further comment con- _ cerning them is indicated. … Ga. 1976) (laundry twice a week; clean uniform three times per week).
468 U.S. 576Amicus Curiae Brief — Ferring B.V. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. (No. 06-372)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
They apply the maxim requiring clean hands only where some unconscionable act of one coming for relief has immediate and necessary relation to the equity that he seeks in respect of the matter in litigation … Air Freight System, Inc. v. NLRB, 510 U.S. 317 (1993).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975
in the mine atmosphere to whieh each miner in the active workings is exposed to 2.0 milligrams or less of respirable dust per cubie meter of air, See. 202(b)(2). … * Legislative History/Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act, p. 339.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
Although Congress displaced federal common law through enactment of the Clean Air Act, Congress did not authorize local counties to impose their own claimed solution to a global phenomenon by invocation … Finally, Petitioners are correct that the Clean Air Act independently preempts Respondents’ claims. The Clean Air Act conflicts with state-law efforts to impose liability for out-of-state emissions.
Transcript of Record — United States v. Barlow
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1902
Th: Honorable the ( hie Justice and Judges of the ( ourt of ( Vaims: Pursuant to the provisions of section 2 of the act of March 3, 1883 (22 Stat., 485—the Bowman Act), and as requested by the Comptroller … neer, All stone must be hard, clean, and free from seams and imperfec. tions, and of good bed and build.’
184 U.S. 123Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pacifica Foundation v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
However, ACT I struck down the contraction of the safe harbor period to midnight through 6 a.m. as unjustified by the record. Id. at 1384. … See Broadcasters Comments at 11; Infinity Comments at 2 (citing ACT I, 852 F.2d at 1343); see also 1990 Report, $5 FCC Red at 5299, $310 n. 16, and comments cited therein.
516 U.S. 1043Opposition Brief — Pymm v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991
During that period, OSHA inspected the plant at least four times and issued numerous citations for violations of OSHA standards and regulations in 1981 and 1985. … (See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908, comment b (1970)). We see no reason, therefore, why what the Court declared in Silkwood should not be applied to the preemptive effect of OSHA.
498 U.S. 1085Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 3, 2022
In implementing the Clean Air Act, which had created a permitting program for “stationary sources” of air pollution and delegated that program to the States, the EPA promulgated regulations “allow[ing] … The issue in Chevron was the meaning of the term “stationary source” in the Clean Air Act. 467 U.S. at 840.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
service agency, such as the defendant corporate provider in that case). 13 upheld a regulation of the Environmental Protection Agency, on the ground that it was a_ permissible construction of the Clean … Air Act.
551 U.S. 158Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cary v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 2878 (2009) (No. 08-1398)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
water and air, and endangered species protection. … App. 2), the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.), the Clean Water and Clean Air Acts (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. and 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.), and the National Forest Management Act (16
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hodges v. Abraham
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
Army Corps of Engineers, 701 F.2d 1011 (2d Cir. 1983) (finding violations of NEPA and of APA through actions under Clean Water Act). … This contention was fully aired at the hearing, and the court finds that there is no support for Dr.
537 U.S. 1105Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026
Air Act’s regulatory scheme directing EPA to set such standards (id. at 44–46). … Allowing those claims to proceed does not introduce competing regulations of emissions that are preempted by structural constitutional principles or the Clean Air Act, as petitioners argue. 20 CONCLUSION
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Vey v. Universe
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS Interplanetary Law, International Law, inclusive of Diplomatic Immunity, the entire United States Constitution and its Universal upholding against conflicting acts and lower … VEY'S DEMAND TO RESTORE LAW & ORDER Vey has been fighting to CLEAN-UP the United States (with appropriate prosecutions of these blatant criminals), RESTORE law and order in the U.S., especially that
528 U.S. 1081Statement Opposing Jurisdiction — Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. Louis v. Trainmen
Supreme Court brief · Statement Opposing Jurisdiction · 1943
A long period might elapse, as the event has shown, before the Commis- sion would be prepared toact. … We do not have air brakes and _ ceuplings on these runs all the time” (Tr. 2 “OA, 35).
318 U.S. 1Opposition Brief — Programmers Guild v. Napolitano
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010
violated the APA’s notice-and-comment requirement, 5 U.S.C. 553(b). … Air Courier Conference, 498 U.S. at 530.
559 U.S. 1067Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Long Manufacturing Co. v. Lilliston Implement Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1972
toward the rear, it has already been shown that this is not the first combine to contain a stepped screen; nor 1s tt the first combine where the screen works im connec- tion with a blower in the cleaning … tests since the Patent Act of 1793, namely the test of obviousness.
409 U.S. 874Amicus Curiae Brief — Burlington Northern Inc. v. Herold
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Reflectorized tape has a tendency to peel and, like other reflectorized material, is difficult and expensive to maintain in clean condition under general conditions of use. … The consequences of the decision below, which can only have the effect of discouraging voluntary use of optional 18 At least one railroad is currently in the process of installing (over a three-year period
474 U.S. 888Appendix — Grey v. American Airlines, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1956
It is said that the Captain was in command and that he was the only one authorized by Civil Air Regulations 61.301, 61.310, to act in an emergency. … I can’t answer that question unless—an airplane has different stalling speeds: Clean stall, partial gear extension stall, full flaps stall. Q.
350 U.S. 989Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Structural Fibers, Inc. v. Kulch
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
The CAAA intended that the federal Clean Air Act be administered by the various states. Ohio’s Title V permit program is described in R.C. §3704.036. … Air Act.
522 U.S. 1008Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Trevor Jim Bishop, Petitioner v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 15, 2021
Appellant went back to the car to clean up the vomit in the car. Appellant spent 10 or 15 minutes cleaning. When he finished and went inside, Jimmy was not back. … Walter had testified that the size of the hematoma would suggest either a rapid bleed over a short period or a very small bleed over a longer period.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.