Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.15s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Safari Aviation, Inc. v. Blakey
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
The emergency rule became effective on October 26, 1994, and the public comment period ended on December 27, 1994. … Air Tour Operators in the State of Hawaii, 59 Fed.Reg. 49138, 49145. In this manner, the FAA left the record open for a comment period that has recently expired.
538 U.S. 946Amicus Brief — Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1976
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE The Texas Farmers Union, of 800 Lake Air Drive, Waco, Texas 76710, respectfully moves under the provi- sions of Rule 42(3) for leave to file a brief amicus … Act of Feb. 21, 1793, 1 Stat. 321. Act of July 4, 1836, ch. 357, § 7, 5 Stat. 117. 13 .
425 U.S. 273Supreme Court brief · Application · Aug 20, 2021
App. 49a (cleaned up). … Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324. ii.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
Pa.). 8 The fire hazard campaign included the period 1990 to 1994 and beyond. See Pet. App. 6a, 46a-47a. . … Western Air- lines, Inc., 623 F.2d 1255 (8th Cir. 1980), the Eighth Cir- cuit has squarely held that false disparagement of a com- petitor’s product supports a Sherman Act § 1 or § 2 claim.
546 U.S. 1031Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 22, 2024
Dep’t of Agric., 779 F.3d 258, 267 (5th Cir. 2015) (cleaned up) (citations omitted); see also Nat’l Env’t Development Ass’n’s Clean Air Project v. EPA, 752 F.3d 999, 1008 (D.C. … Air. Regul. Grp. v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brush v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1937
ae ee ae —s wore etre hee oe perenne ASS SS eR ESRD TIS SE FEO EE SET PELL ee ee ee eet ee ee Sues s : a os BB rnin saan aire itn sae Paw = Supreme Court of the United States No. - October Term … Steadily developing over a period of 100 years, the municipal water supply‘system now represents an outlay of $480,000,000 (R. 23), and is the result of special statu- tory powers of eminent domain
300 U.S. 352Petition for Writ of Certiorari — In Re Joyce Beggs, et vir, Petitioners
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 4, 2024
Clean floor or roofjoist system in confined space 15. … Air mover (per 24 hour period) - No monitoring 2,643.50 SF 1,322.75 SF 022.75 SF 15.00 E/ Grand Total 517,628.31 MikkaOQuinn 8/16/2023 2307-265550WTR 54b NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM PROPERTY
Reply Brief — David R. Morabito, et ux., Petitioners v. New York, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 31, 2020
Pursuant to Respondents’ own studies, they proposed extensive rules and regulations to preserve the needed conversation practices of soil, water, and air quality. … The Revised dSGEIS stated that HVHF would also be a clean green energy source.
Opposition Brief — Ohio v. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1970
L. 87-88, 75 Stat. 204; The Water Quality Act of 1965, Oct. 2, 1965, Pub. L. 89-234, 79 Stat. 903, The Clean Water Restoration Act of 1966, Nov. 3, 1966, Pub. … Why can’t the court be preoccupied with the rights of the majority and involve itself in clean water and clean airt” APPENDIX II AFFIDAVIT ROBERT E.
400 U.S. 963Opposition — M. G. R. S., Inc. v. California State Board of Equalization
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
Catalina in the course of repairing, cleaning, altering or improving. (Stipulation, §9.) … Catalina in the course of repairing, cleaning, altering, and improving the same, and charges made for labor and services rendered in respect to such repairing, cleaning, altering, or improving, in the
449 U.S. 874Amicus Brief — American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Elec. Power Service Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1983
The full avoided cost role is the product of extensive and well-reasoned staff discussion papers, a formal environmental impact review, voluminous public comments garnered in two com- ment periods … air and clean water held in com- mon by all people.
461 U.S. 402Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 9, 2018
The public comment period was later extended to 75 days, and more than 296,000 comments were received. … FERC, 545 F.3d 1207, 1216-17 (9th Cir. 2008), but the plaintiff power company in that case challenged a requirement imposed on it under the Clean Water Act.
Reply Brief — Edison Electric Institute v. Piedmont Environmental Council (No. 09-343)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2009
Council, BET Oe Ae ceed Bee 2 Clean Air Implementation Project v. EPA, 150 F.3d 1200 (D.C. Cir. 1998)...........:0..csccecceseees 11 Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Cons. … See, e.g., Clean Air Implementation Project v. EPA, 150 F.3d 1200, 1204 (D.C.
Supplemental Brief — Triangle Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1992
Ex- amples would be gradual adverse effect of smoke, fumes, air or stream pollution, contamination of water supply or vegetation. … Ex- amples would be gradual adverse effect of smoke, fumes, air or stream pollution, contamination of water supply or vegetation.
506 U.S. 824Appendix — Pfister v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1980
C78-1567A DELTA Air LINES., et al. ORDER This suit by a former employee of Delta Air Lines, Inc. … DELTA AIR LINES, ET AL.
446 U.S. 963Amicus Curiae Brief — Rimini Street, Inc., Petitioner v. Oracle USA, Inc., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2019
But machines break and need maintenance, so we take our cars to the mechanic or call the AC repairperson when the air conditioner dies on a sweltering August day. … Likewise, the Fifth Circuit found no patent infringement under the right-to-repair doctrine regarding a company that cleaned, resurfaced, and reassembled patented tubes that had become unusable due to
Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Allegany, New York v. United States (Nos. 91-558, 91-543, 91-563)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
of 1954, 42 U.S.C. §2011 et seq. l Clean Air Act, as amended by the Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §1857 et seq. 13 Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seg. 8, 11, 14 Low-Level Radioactive … us The 1985 Amendments’ requirement that States own and possess radi- oactive waste is also far more intrusive on State dignity and power than the EPA's Clean Air Act regulations reviewed by three Courts
Reply Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2000
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Congress intended to grant citizens standing to sue under the Clean Water Act to the full extent permitted by the Constitution. … CONGRESS INTENDED THAT CITIZENS HAVE STANDING TO SUE UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT TO THE FULL EXTENT PERMITTED BY THE CONSTITUTION The text of the Clean Water Act permits suit by “any citizen,” which
528 U.S. 167Reply Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1991
Although respondents and their amici repeatedly invoke the “goals” of the Clean Water Act, neither those goals nor the statute as a whole can support their interpreta- tion of the Act. … Air Act.
499 U.S. 946Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Littriello v. United States (No. 07-851)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778 (1984), which upheld regulations under the Clean Air Act. … In stating the test, the Opinion specifically uses the term “legislative regulations” with respect to authority granted by Congress under the 1970 amendment to the Clean Air Act to the Environmental
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.